Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says

A Ukrainian military instructor of the Azov Brigade walks through a trench during a military training exercise in the eastern Donetsk region, on February 3, 2025, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 February 2025
Follow

Russian drone attacks injure mother, two children in central Ukraine, official says

  • Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in their attacks in the war, that Russia started with its full-scale invasion on Ukraine nearly three years ago.

A Russian overnight drone attack on the city of Dolynska in central Ukraine injured a mother and her two children and forced the evacuation of people from 38 flats after their apartment building was damaged, a regional official said on Tuesday.
“A difficult night for the Kirovohrad region,” Andriy Raikovych, governor of the Kirovohrad region said in a post on the Telegram messaging app. “An enemy drone hit a high-rise building in Dolynska.”
The mother and one of the children were hospitalized, Raikovych added.
He posted photos of flames bursting out of windows of a high-story apartment building.
Reuters could not independently verify the report. There was no immediate comment from Russia.
Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in their attacks in the war, that Russia started with its full-scale invasion on Ukraine nearly three years ago. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian.
The attack took place as top Russian and US officials are meeting in the Saudi Arabia for talks — without the participation of Kyiv or its European allies — on how to end the war in Ukraine.


Activist Peter Tatchell arrested over ‘globalize the intifada’ placard

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Activist Peter Tatchell arrested over ‘globalize the intifada’ placard

  • Arrest in London during Saturday protest an ‘attack on free speech,’ his foundation says
  • Intifada ‘does not mean violence and is not antisemitic,’ veteran campaigner claims

LONDON: Prominent activist Peter Tatchell was arrested at a pro-Palestine march in central London, The Independent reported.

According to his foundation, the 74-year-old was arrested for holding a placard that said: “Globalize the intifada: Nonviolent resistance. End Israel’s occupation of Gaza & West Bank.”

The Peter Tatchell Foundation said in a statement that the activist labeled his Saturday arrest as an “attack on free speech.”

It added: “The police claimed the word intifada is unlawful. The word intifada is not a crime in law. The police are engaged in overreach by making it an arrestable offense.

“This is part of a dangerous trend to increasingly restrict and criminalize peaceful protests.”

Tatchell described the word “intifada,” an Arab term, as meaning “uprising, rebellion or resistance against Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

“It does not mean violence and is not antisemitic. It is against the Israeli regime and its war crimes, not against Jewish people.”

According to his foundation, Tatchell was transported to Sutton police station to be detained following his arrest.

In December last year, London’s Metropolitan Police said that pro-Palestine protesters chanting “globalize the intifada” would face arrest, attributing the new rules to a “changing context” in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack in Australia.

“Officers policing the Palestine Coalition protest have arrested a 74-year-old man on suspicion of a public order offense. He was seen carrying a sign including the words ‘globalize the intifada’,” the Metropolitan Police said on X.

According to a witness, Tatchell had been marching near police officers with the placard for about a mile when the group came across a counterprotest.

He was then stopped and “manhandled by 10 officers,” said Jacky Summerfield, who accompanied Tatchell at the protest.

“I was shoved back behind a cordon of officers and unable to speak to him after that,” she said.

“I couldn’t get any closer to hear anything more than that; it was for Section 5 (of the Public Order Act).

“There had been no issue until that. He was walking near the police officers. Nobody had said or done anything.”