Invest in resilience, not aid: WEF panel advocates for empowering fragile states 

Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud stressed the importance of capacity-building within state institutions as a critical step in restoring public trust. (Screen shot)
Short Url
Updated 21 January 2025
Follow

Invest in resilience, not aid: WEF panel advocates for empowering fragile states 

  • President Mohamud emphasized fragile states like Somalia have untapped potential and not seeking handouts but investments
  • Badr Jafar, CEO of Crescent Enterprises, highlighted the private sector’s role in building resilience in fragile states and called for a shift from charity to sustainable investment 

DUBAI: Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and UAE business leader Badr Jafar issued a strong call to action at the World Economic Forum on Tuesday, urging global leaders to adopt innovative strategies to address the challenges facing fragile states. 

Their roadmap emphasized shifting from dependency on aid to building economic resilience and sustainable development through investment and collaboration. 

“Fragile states like Somalia are brimming with untapped potential,” President Mohamud said. 

“We are not asking for handouts. We are asking for investments in our people, in our ideas, and in the future of nations that are too often written off.” 

Mohamud stressed the importance of capacity-building within state institutions as a critical step in restoring public trust. 

“Stability comes from within. It begins with functional institutions that citizens can rely on,” he said, referencing Somalia’s ongoing journey of recovery after decades of conflict. 

Badr Jafar, CEO of Crescent Enterprises, echoed Mohamud’s sentiments and emphasized the private sector’s role in fostering resilience. 

“The private sector must be seen as an equal partner in building resilience,” Jafar said. 

He outlined four key challenges for fragile states and the private sector’s role in overcoming them: 

  • A shift is needed from charity to sustainable investment, essential for empowering local economies and fostering long-term growth. 
  • Small and medium-sized enterprises are often overlooked in humanitarian efforts, despite their potential to create jobs and stimulate economic growth in fragile regions. 
  • A lack of clear and structured platforms prevents businesses from engaging meaningfully in recovery efforts, beyond simply offering donations. 
  • Breaking the “dependency traps” created by long-term aids reliance, with innovative financing models such as blended finance essential for stimulating growth. 

“Fragility is not just a government issue; it’s a societal issue. And businesses are part of that society,” he added, urging deeper collaboration between governments and private enterprises to drive sustainable change. 

While the panel was dominated by the two men’s impassioned appeals, World Bank Managing Director of Operations Anna Bjerde and Citigroup’s Ernesto Torres Cantu provided measured perspectives. 

Bjerde stressed the need for better coordination among international donors to enhance the impact of aid, while Torres Cantu highlighted the risks faced by private investors in fragile economies. 

The discussion concluded with consensus on the importance of a multi-faceted approach to tackling fragility. 

Local leadership, innovative financing mechanisms and strong public-private partnerships emerged as critical pillars for transforming fragile states into thriving economies. 


Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

ALULA: Global trade is not retreating into deglobalization despite geopolitical shocks, but is instead undergoing a structural reshuffling led by US-China tensions, according to Harvard University economist Pol Antras. 

Presenting research at the AlUla Emerging Market Economies Conference, Antras said there is no evidence that countries are systematically turning inward. Instead, trade flows are being redirected across markets, creating winners and losers depending on export structure and exposure to Chinese competition. 

This comes as debate intensifies over whether supply-chain disruptions, industrial policy and rising trade barriers signal the end of globalization after decades of expansion. 

Speaking to Arab News on the sidelines of the event, Antras said: “I think the right way to view it is more a reorganization, where things are moving from some countries to others rather than a general trend where countries are becoming more inward looking, in a sense of producers selling more of their stuff domestically than internationally, or consumers buying more domestic products than foreign products.”  

He said a change of that scale has not yet happened, which is important to recognize when navigating the reshuffling — a shift his research shows is driven by Chinese producers redirecting sales away from the US toward other economies. 

He added that countries are affected differently, but highlighted that the Kingdom’s position is relatively positive, stating: “In the case of Saudi Arabia, for instance, its export structure, what it exports, is very different than what China exports, so in that sense it’s better positioned so suffer less negative consequences of recent events.” 

He went on to say that economies likely to be more negatively impacted than the Kingdom would be those with more producers in sectors exposed to Chinese competition. He added that while many countries may feel inclined to follow the United States’ footsteps by implementing their own tariffs, he would advise against such a move.  

Instead, he pointed to supporting producers facing the shock as a better way to protect and prepare economies, describing it as a key step toward building resilience — a view Professor Antras underscored as fundamental. 

Elaborating on the Kingdom’s position amid rising tensions and structural reorganization, he said Saudi Arabia holds a relative advantage in its economic framework. 

“Saudi Arabia should not be too worried about facing increased competitive pressures in selling its exports to other markets, by its nature. On the other hand, there is a benefit of the current situation, which is when Chinese producers find it hard to sell in US market, they naturally pivot to other markets.” 

He said that pivot could benefit importing economies, including Saudi Arabia, by lowering Chinese export prices. The shift could increase the Kingdom’s import volumes from China while easing cost pressures for domestic producers.