French court hands down heavy sentences in teacher beheading trial

Louise Tort (C), French lawyer for defendant Brahim Chnina, speaks to the press at the Paris Special Assize Court after the verdict (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 21 December 2024
Follow

French court hands down heavy sentences in teacher beheading trial

PARIS: A French court on Friday handed heavy sentences to several men convicted of having played a role in the jihadist beheading of schoolteacher Samuel Paty in 2020 — a murder that horrified France.
Paty, 47, was murdered in October 2020 by an 18-year-old Islamist radical of Chechen origin after showing cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in class.
His killer, Abdoullakh Anzorov, died in a shootout with police.
Two friends of Anzorov, Naim Boudaoud, 22, and Azim Epsirkhanov, 23, were on Friday convicted of complicity in the killing and jailed for 16 years.
Prosecutors had accused them of having given Anzorov logistical support, including to buy weapons.
Epsirkhanov admitted he had received 800 euros ($840) from his fellow Chechen Anzorov to find him a real gun but had not succeeded.
Prosecutors said Boudaoud had accompanied Anzorov to buy two replica guns and steel pellets on the day of the attack.
Two other defendants who took part in the hate campaign against Paty before his murder were convicted of terrorist criminal association.
Brahim Chnina, the 52-year-old Moroccan father of a schoolgirl who falsely claimed that Paty had asked Muslim students to leave his classroom before showing the caricatures, was jailed for 13 years.
His daughter, then aged 13, was not actually in the classroom at the time and earlier in the trial apologized to her former teacher’s family.
Abdelhakim Sefrioui, a 65-year-old Franco-Moroccan Islamist activist, was jailed for 15 years.
Chnina had posted messages and videos attacking Paty online. Sefrioui, founder of a now-banned pro-Hamas group, had denounced Paty as a “thug” in another video.
He and Chnina spread the teenager’s lies on social networks with the aim, said prosecutors, to provoke “a feeling of hatred” to prepare the way for “several crimes.”
Chnina spoke to Anzorov nine times by telephone in a four-day period after he published videos criticizing Paty, the investigation showed. But Sefrioui had told investigators he was only seeking “administrative sanctions.”
“Nobody is saying that they wanted Samuel Paty to die,” prosecutor Nicholas Braconnay had told the court.
“But by lighting thousands of fuses online, they knew that one of them would lead to jihadist violence against the blasphemous teacher.”
The other four defendants, part of a network of jihadist sympathizers around Anzorov spreading inflammatory content online, were also convicted, receiving either jail or suspended sentences.

Paty, who has become a free-speech icon, had used the cartoons, first published in Charlie Hebdo magazine, as part of an ethics class to discuss freedom of expression laws in France.
Blasphemy is legal in a nation that prides itself on its secular values, and there is a long history of cartoons mocking religious figures.
In November, seven men and one woman went on trial, charged with contributing to the climate of hatred that led to the beheading of the history and geography teacher in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, west of Paris.
The case was heard by a court panel of professional judges in a trial that lasted seven weeks.
Before the court’s ruling came on Friday, the family of Paty had accused the prosecution of leniency.
Prosecutors had requested that some of the accused be acquitted, and had disputed the “terrorist intent” of the defendants.
Paty’s sister Mickaelle told BFMTV that the demands by prosecutors were “very weak,” saying she feared that these would be confirmed by the court.
“I think my brother died for nothing,” she said, and teachers were still being targeted by violence and threats, she added.
Paty’s killing took place just weeks after Charlie Hebdo republished the cartoons, which originally appeared in 2015.
After the magazine first published them, Islamist gunmen stormed its offices, killing 12 people.


EU leaders to reassess US ties despite Trump U-turn on Greenland

Updated 22 January 2026
Follow

EU leaders to reassess US ties despite Trump U-turn on Greenland

  • Diplomats stressed that, although Thursday’s emergency EU talks in Brussels would now lose some of their urgency, the longer-term issue of how to handle the relationship with the US remained

BRUSSELS: EU leaders will rethink their ties with the US at an emergency summit on Thursday after Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs and even military action to ​acquire Greenland badly shook confidence in the transatlantic relationship, diplomats said.
Trump abruptly stepped back on Wednesday from his threat of tariffs on eight European nations, ruled out using force to take Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark, and suggested a deal was in sight to end the dispute.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, welcoming Trump’s U-turn on Greenland, urged Europeans not to be too quick to write off the transatlantic partnership.
But EU governments remain wary of another change of mind by a mercurial president who is increasingly seen as a bully that Europe will have to stand up to, and they are focused on coming up with a longer-term plan on how to deal with the ‌United States under this ‌administration and possibly its successors too.
“Trump crossed the Rubicon. He might do ‌it ⁠again. ​There is no ‌going back to what it was. And leaders will discuss it,” one EU diplomat said, adding that the bloc needed to move away from its heavy reliance on the US in many areas.
“We need to try to keep him (Trump) close while working on becoming more independent from the US It is a process, probably a long one,” the diplomat said.
EU RELIANCE ON US
After decades of relying on the United States for defense within the NATO alliance, the EU lacks the needed intelligence, transport, missile defense and production capabilities to defend itself against a possible Russian attack. This gives the US substantial leverage.
The US ⁠is also Europe’s biggest trading partner, making the EU vulnerable to Trump’s policies of imposing tariffs to reduce Washington’s trade deficit in goods, and, as in ‌the case of Greenland, to achieve other goals.
“We need to discuss where ‍the red lines are, how we deal with this bully ‍across the Atlantic, where our strengths are,” a second EU diplomat said.
“Trump says no tariffs today, but does ‍that mean also no tariffs tomorrow, or will he again quickly change his mind? We need to discuss what to do then,” the second diplomat said.
The EU had been considering a package of retaliatory tariffs on 93 billion euros ($108.74 billion) on US imports or anti-coercive measures if Trump had gone ahead with his own tariffs, while knowing such a step would harm Europe’s economy as well ​as the United States.
WHAT’S THE GREENLAND DEAL?
Several diplomats noted there were still few details of the new plan for Greenland, agreed between Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte late on ⁠Wednesday on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
“Nothing much changed. We still need to see details of the Greenland deal. We are a bit fed up with all the bullying. And we need to act on a few things: more resiliency, unity, get our things together on internal market, competitiveness. And no more accepting tariff bullying,” a third diplomat said.
Rutte told Reuters in an interview in Davos on Thursday that under the framework deal he reached with Trump the Western allies would have to step up their presence in the Arctic.
He also said talks would continue between Denmark, Greenland and the US on specific issues.
Diplomats stressed that, although Thursday’s emergency EU talks in Brussels would now lose some of their urgency, the longer-term issue of how to handle the relationship with the US remained.
“The approach of a united front in solidarity with Denmark and Greenland while focusing on de-escalation and finding an off-ramp has worked,” a fourth EU diplomat said.
“At the ‌same time it would be good to reflect on the state of the relationship and how we want to shape this going forward, given the experiences of the past week (and year),” he said.