Nearly 400 authors call for boycott of Israeli cultural institutions

A man inspects the damage at the site of an Israeli strike that targetted an area in Khan Yunis on the southern Gaza Strip on October 25, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 October 2024
Follow

Nearly 400 authors call for boycott of Israeli cultural institutions

  • Writers including Sally Rooney and Arundhati Roy say those who stay silent over Gaza are ‘complicit in genocide’
  • Author Lee Child warns boycott will hit Israel’s ‘only voices for peace and common sense’

LONDON: A group of almost 400 authors have called for a boycott of Israeli cultural institutions.

The writers, including Sally Rooney and Arundhati Roy, say Israeli publishers, book festivals and literary agencies that have not spoken out against the war in Gaza are “complicit in genocide.”

The unpublished letter, organized by the Palestine Festival of Literature, claims that the “genocide … is the biggest war on children this century.”

It adds: “Culture has played an integral role in normalizing these injustices. Israeli cultural institutions, often working directly with the state, have been crucial in obfuscating, disguising and art-washing the dispossession and oppression of millions of Palestinians for decades.

“We cannot in good conscience engage with Israeli institutions without interrogating their relationship to apartheid and displacement.”

The Fossil Free Books pressure group, which worked to get literary festivals to cut ties with sponsors such as Baillie Gifford over the war earlier this year, is supporting the letter, alongside a number of Booker prize nominees. A full list of signatories is set to be released next week.

“We will not work with Israeli cultural institutions that are complicit or have remained silent observers of the overwhelming oppression of Palestinians,” the letter, seen by The Times, said.

“We will not cooperate with Israeli institutions including publishers, festivals, literary agencies and publications that are complicit in violating Palestinian rights.”

The move to boycott Israeli cultural institutions has also been criticized, including by “Jack Reacher” author Lee Child, who said writers should not “attack the very people whose hearts are still in the right place,” including Israel’s “only voices for peace and common sense.”

Child said: “They are firm allies in the struggle for an equitable outcome, and to demonise them is to shoot the Palestinian cause in the foot. Personally, I support a full two-state solution, and I’m a pragmatic person, so my instinct is to partner with Israelis who think the same way. Building bridges with them is the way to go. Canceling them is nuts.”

Larry Finlay, a former publishing chief at Transworld books, told The Times: “The target of (the signatories’) ire is just wrong because the people who will suffer from this will be Israelis who are on the left and anti-Netanyahu.

“There is no wisdom for this boycott, which is born out of hatred and antisemitism.”


Modi ally proposes social media ban for India’s teens as global debate grows

Updated 54 min 18 sec ago
Follow

Modi ally proposes social media ban for India’s teens as global debate grows

  • India is the world’s second-biggest smartphone market with 750 million devices and a billion Internet users
  • South Asian nation is a key growth market for social media apps and does not set a minimum age for access

NEW DELHI: An ally of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has proposed a bill to ban social media for children, as the world’s biggest market for Meta and YouTube joins a global debate on the impact of social media on young people’s health and safety.
“Not only are our children becoming addicted to social media, but India is also one of the world’s largest producers of data for foreign platforms,” lawmaker L.S.K. Devarayalu said on Friday.
“Based on this data, these companies are creating advanced AI systems, effectively turning Indian users into unpaid data providers, while the ‌strategic and economic ‌benefits are reaped elsewhere,” he said.
Australia last ‌month ⁠became the ‌first country to ban social media for children under 16, blocking access in a move welcomed by many parents and child advocates but criticized by major technology companies and free-speech advocates. France’s National Assembly this week backed legislation to ban children under 15 from social media, while Britain, Denmark and Greece are studying the issue.
Facebook operator Meta, YouTube-parent Alphabet and X did ⁠not respond on Saturday to emails seeking comment on the Indian legislation. Meta has ‌said it backs laws for parental oversight but ‍that “governments considering bans should be careful ‍not to push teens toward less safe, unregulated sites.”
India’s IT ministry ‍did not respond to a request for comment.
India, the world’s second-biggest smartphone market with 750 million devices and a billion Internet users, is a key growth market for social media apps and does not set a minimum age for access.
Devarayalu’s 15-page Social Media (Age Restrictions and Online Safety) Bill, which is not public but was seen by Reuters, says ⁠no one under 16 “shall be permitted to create, maintain, or hold” a social media account and those found to have one should have them disabled.
“We are asking that the entire onus of ensuring users’ age be placed on the social media platforms,” Devarayalu said.
The government’s chief economic adviser attracted attention on Thursday by saying India should draft policies on age-based access limits to tackle “digital addiction.”
Devarayalu’s legislation is a private member’s bill — not proposed to parliament by a federal minister — but such bills often trigger debates in parliament and influence lawmaking.
He is from the ‌Telugu Desam Party, which governs the southern state Andhra Pradesh and is vital to Modi’s coalition government.