What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

Modi and Xi met on Wednesday on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan. It was their first formal talk since the 2020 clashes on the disputed border between India and China led to a military buildup on both sides. (Screenshot)
Short Url
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

  • Indian PM, Chinese president meet on sidelines of BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia
  • First formal talk between parties since 2020 deadly clashes on disputed India-China border

NEW DELHI: After years of tensions, signs of a thaw are emerging in Indian-Chinese relations, experts say, following the meeting of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping in Russia.

Modi and Xi met on Wednesday on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan. It was their first formal talk since the 2020 clashes on the disputed border between India and China led to a military buildup on both sides.

 

The 3,440 km-long Himalayan border has been a cause of tensions for decades and the two countries fought a war over it in 1962. The clash in Galwan Valley in 2020 was their worst confrontation since then, with at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers killed.

The military standoff that followed affected bilateral business ties, leading to India banning several Chinese mobile apps, including TikTok, and stopping passenger flights to China.

Rounds of negotiations taking place over the past four years had not yielded any resolution but during Wednesday’s meeting, Modi and Xi agreed to “explore a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question,” the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement.

It was widely seen as a “positive first step” signaling a thaw, Manoj Kewalramani, chairperson of the Indo-Pacific Research Program and a China studies fellow at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, told Arab News.

“Having this sort of abnormality in the relationship does not suit either side in the long run. So, there has been this impetus that we need to find some pathway to arriving at some sort of a new balance in the relationship,” he said.

“From an Indian point of view, of course engaging with China is important … you can’t necessarily have an abnormal high-intensity tense border area with such a neighbor for a long period of time.”

 

For China, too, trying to normalize the relationship was needed, especially in the increasingly hostile external environment.

“Whether it is in the South China Sea, East China Sea; whether it’s the issues with Russia and Ukraine; or whether it’s tensions in the Middle East, there’s an increasingly strained external environment,” Kewalramani said. “It makes sense to have some sort of a tactical understanding with a country like India, at least to begin with, and try to normalize that relationship.”

Mohan Guruswamy, chairman of the Centre for Policy Alternatives in New Delhi, said it was mutual geopolitical and economic interests that had compelled the leaders of the world’s two most populous countries to officially shake hands for the first time in nearly five years.

“India realizes that its place in the new world order — which is emerging — cannot be rated high unless China agrees. For instance, Britain, America, France, (and) Russia all agreed to India’s being in the UN Security Council. Only China disagrees. If China takes out its objections, then there is no objection to India’s membership,” he said.

“There is a realization in India also that we need China. And China has a trade surplus with India which is almost $40-50 billion a year. They would like to keep that, and they would also like to invest in India, because they realize that India is a big market.”

If the normalization proceeds and if there is enough political will for it to continue, it will have an impact on international politics and relations, especially in the Global South.

“There will be some elements of collaboration,” said Prof. Varaprasad Sekhar Dolla from the Center for East Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi.

“It will have an impact on the multipolar world that is unfolding.”


Germany plays down threat of US invading Greenland after talks

Updated 13 January 2026
Follow

Germany plays down threat of US invading Greenland after talks

WASHINGTON: Germany’s top diplomat on Monday played down the risk of a US attack on Greenland, after President Donald Trump’s repeated threats to seize the island from NATO ally Denmark.
Asked after meeting Secretary of State Marco Rubio about a unilateral military move by Trump, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said: “I have no indication that this is being seriously considered.”
“Rather, I believe there is a common interest in addressing the security issues that arise in the Arctic region, and that we should and will do so,” he told reporters.
“NATO is only now in the process of developing more concrete plans on this, and these will then be discussed jointly with our US partners.”
Wadephul’s visit comes ahead of talks this week in Washington between Rubio and the top diplomats of Denmark and Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark.
Trump in recent days has vowed that the United States will take Greenland “one way or the other” and said he can do it “the nice way or the more difficult way.”
Greenland’s government on Monday repeated that it would not accept a US takeover under “any circumstance.”
Greenland and NATO also said Monday that they were working on bolstering defense of the Arctic territory, a key concern cited by Trump.
Trump has repeatedly pointed to growing Arctic activity by Russia and China as a reason why the United States needs to take over Greenland.
But he has also spoken more broadly of his desire to expand the land mass controlled by the United States.