Book Review: ‘Thinking with Type’

Short Url
Updated 18 October 2024
Follow

Book Review: ‘Thinking with Type’

It has been 20 years since Ellen Lupton’s 2004 book, “Thinking with Type: A critical guide for designers, editors & students” was released, but it is still as relevant as ever.

The book opens with: “The organization of letters on a blank page — or screen — is the designer’s most basic challenge. What kind of font to use? How big? How should those letters, words and paragraphs be aligned, spaced, ordered, shaped and otherwise manipulated?”

While teaching at the Maryland Institute College of Art in Baltimore, Lupton wrote the book because she could not find one that encapsulated everything she deemed important for her students.

Lupton, a renowned graphic designer, educator and writer, has been a go-to person for typography and design theory for decades. Her work blends theory with practical insight, making complex design concepts accessible to a wider audience.

The book is divided into three sections — “Letter,” “Text” and “Grid” — which address a different aspect of typography.

In the “Letter” section, Lupton explores the anatomy of individual characters, explaining font styles, classifications and the historical evolution of typefaces.

The “Text” section focuses on how text is structured on a page, discussing important details like spacing, alignment and legibility — all of which are crucial for effective communication.

The “Grid” section explores how type can be organized to create a balanced and visually appealing layout.

The book has become a staple in classrooms and for people simply interested in typography. The pages offer a clear and engaging roadmap for the principles of working with type, in both print and digital mediums.

Lupton’s use of real-world examples — along with exercises for readers — makes the book both practical and visually stimulating.


What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

Photo/Supplied
Updated 19 December 2025
Follow

What We Are Reading Today: ‘Collaborating with the Enemy’

  • This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world

The title of the 2017 book “Collaborating with the Enemy: How to Work with People You Don’t Agree with or Like or Trust,” by Adam Kahane, is sure to catch your curiosity.

Printed by the independent, mission-driven publishing company Berrett-Koehler, the book delivers on delving into the topic.

Kahane, a director of Reos Partners — which describes itself as “an international social enterprise that helps people move forward together on their most important and intractable issues” — argues that traditional collaboration, which relies on harmony, consensus and a clear, shared plan, is often impossible to achieve in complex, polarized situations.

Instead, he proposes something called “stretch collaboration,” a framework for working with people you may not agree with, like, or even trust. 

This skill is certainly necessary to acquire and maintain in our increasingly globalized world.

Some of the practical techniques and strategies mentioned can arguably be applied beyond the workplace: in fractured families or friendships, for example.

“The problem with enemyfying is not that we never have enemies: we often face people and situations that present us with difficulties and dangers,” Kahane writes.

“Moreover, any effort we make to effect change in the world will create discomfort, resistance, and opposition. The real problem with enemyfying is that it distracts and unbalances us. We cannot avoid others whom we find challenging, so we need to focus simply on deciding, given these challenges, what we ourselves will do next.”

The book boasts a foreword by Peter Block, bestselling author of “Community and Stewardship,” who writes: “The book is really an annotation on the title. The title asks me to collaborate with people I don’t agree with. Not so difficult. But then the stakes are raised, and I am asked to collaborate with people I don’t like. This too is manageable, even common in most workplaces.

“The final ask, though, is tougher: collaborate with people I don’t trust; even people I consider enemies. To make these acts doable is the promise of the book.”

And, in a way, it does. But Kahane seems to also use this book to pat himself on the back. In parts it reads like an expanded LinkedIn testimonial to his own resume.