ECHR ruling for Cyprus asylum-seekers a ‘perfect win’ for human rights, say lawyers

Migrants aboard a Cyprus marine police patrol boat are brought to a harbor after being rescued from their own vessel off the Mediterranean island nation’s southeastern coast of Protaras, Cyprus. (AP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 11 October 2024
Follow

ECHR ruling for Cyprus asylum-seekers a ‘perfect win’ for human rights, say lawyers

  • The ECHR on Tuesday condemned Nicosia for returning two Syrian refugees to Lebanon who had arrived on a small boat

LONDON: Human rights lawyers on Friday were celebrating a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights for Cyprus to pay damages to two Syrian refugees who were blocked from applying for asylum as a major victory.

The ECHR on Tuesday condemned Nicosia for returning two Syrian refugees to Lebanon who had arrived on a small boat, without examining their asylum claim, and said the country had committed four violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Cyprus failed to conduct “any assessment of the risk of lack of access to an effective asylum process in Lebanon or the living conditions of asylum-seekers there,” it also said, adding that the Cypriot government had not assessed the risk of “refoulement,” which is the forcible return of refugees to a country such as Syria where they might be subjected to persecution.

Lawyer Nicoletta Charalambidou, who represented the refugees, said the judgment set a precedent against Cyprus’ migration policies, The Guardian newspaper reported on Friday.

“For four years the migration policies of Cyprus have relied on human rights violations, and illegal pushbacks at land and sea,” she said.

“This ruling has exposed these illegal practices and it has set a precedent. It is a perfect win for human rights,” she added.

Charalambidou stated that more legal actions are likely to follow, as asylum-seekers seek justice for violations of their rights under EU and international law.

“There are many more that I will be filing here in Nicosia before the administrative court of international protection and of course this week’s judgment (in Strasbourg) will encourage others,” she said.

“At first we saw pushbacks in the sea, now we’re seeing pushbacks in the buffer zone but Cyprus has obligations. It has to provide access to asylum requests wherever they come from and it has to provide dignified reception conditions. It is duty bound to do that under EU and international law.”

The ruling came amid reports by the UN’s refugee agency and the Border Violence Monitoring Network highlighting Cyprus’ use of new surveillance technologies and forcible expulsions, particularly in the buffer zone.

Around 65 asylum-seekers, including minors and cancer patients, remain stranded in the UN-patrolled zone between Cyprus’ divided regions.

“The state is now providing food but what is required is a sustainable long-term solution,” said Emilia Strovolidou, the UN agency’s spokesperson. “We’re in talks with the government. There are people who’ve been in limbo for months now and psychologically they’re in a very difficult situation.”

However, Nicholas Ioannides, Cyprus’ deputy minister in charge of migration, said in August his country was not bound under EU law to examine asylum requests even if lodged by claimants in a transit zone.

“Cyprus has taken a decision that it will not accept flows through the green line, particularly as we’ve managed to have zero arrivals via sea,” he said.


UK proposal to revisit Israel arms license suspension ‘appalling’: Civil society groups

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

UK proposal to revisit Israel arms license suspension ‘appalling’: Civil society groups

  • ‘A continuation of the status quo is insufficient, but a revocation of its current policies is altogether unconscionable’
  • ‘It also risks demonstrating the UK’s weak commitment to upholding international law’

LONDON: The UK government’s overtures toward unblocking arms licenses to Israel have been condemned by five major civil society groups.

Amid outrage over the war on Gaza, the government suspended about 30 of 350 arms licenses to Israel in September 2024.

Components for the F-35 jet used by the Israeli Air Force were exempt from the partial suspension, despite the aircraft being used extensively to target civilian areas of Gaza.

In July 2024, three 2,000-pound bombs were dropped by F-35s on an area in Khan Younis that Israel had declared a “safe zone,” killing 90 Palestinians.

Peter Kyle, the government’s business and trade secretary, has now committed to revisiting UK-Israel trade relations and the partial pause on arms export licenses. Kyle told the London-based Jewish Chronicle that the two issues are “intrinsically linked.”

In response, the Campaign Against Arms Trade, Global Justice Now, the Global Legal Action Network, the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians and War on Want condemned the proposal as “appalling.”

On top of previous moves ostensibly aimed at curtailing Israeli aggression in Gaza, the UK government also suspended talks on a new trade deal last May but failed to suspend the existing trade agreement.

The five leading civil society organizations said in a joint statement: “Peter Kyle said that he wants to see movement towards a ‘sustainable peace’ in order for these measures to be considered. This position is completely divorced from reality.

“Israel’s continued killing of Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank demonstrates a total disregard for peace, and a continuation of the genocide of the Palestinian people.

“Furthermore, Israel has concentrated the population of Gaza into an area beyond the Yellow Line, constituting only 42 percent of the Gaza Strip, and continues to expand this area.”

The five organizations also highlighted Israel’s demolition of Palestinian homes in its “zone of control” in Gaza, in an attempt to “ensure that life continues to be unlivable” in the war-torn enclave.

There has been “little or no improvement” in the factors cited by the UK government for the initial arms export suspensions, the statement said.

“In fact, it is not even the case that there has been no substantive change. Rather, Israel has actively introduced new disruptions to aid distribution in Gaza, including its revocation of the licenses of 37 international non-governmental organisations working on aid provision in Gaza and the West Bank,” it added.

The UK government must continue to suspend the 30 licenses, but also the remaining 320, and cancel the existing free trade agreement with Israel, the five groups said.

“A continuation of the status quo is insufficient, but a revocation of its current policies is altogether unconscionable,” they added.

“It not only fails to hold Israel to account for its genocide of the Palestinian people, but it also risks demonstrating the UK’s weak commitment to upholding international law, already revealed through its continued supply of arms and business-as-usual approach to arms and economic trade with Israel, which has been damaged significantly in recent years by the UK’s continued support of Israel, despite its continued crimes against the Palestinian people.”