Pressure grows in Philippines to stop sending migrant workers to Israel

Philippine nationals arrive at Manila’s international airport on Oct. 18, 2023, after they were repatriated from Israel. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 October 2024
Follow

Pressure grows in Philippines to stop sending migrant workers to Israel

  • About 27,000 Filipinos, mostly caregivers, are living and working in Israel
  • Worker deployment to neighboring Lebanon banned over security situation

MANILA: The Philippine government is facing pressure to stop sending workers to Israel, with labor rights advocates and politicians raising security concerns amid the escalating conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon.

The Philippines does not allow the sending of workers to Lebanon, which is on its alert level 3 that carries a deployment ban. For the past few weeks, it has been also calling on nationals to return home in the wake of Israel’s increasing bombardment of civilian sites.

But no such measures are in place for Israel, which remains on the Philippine government’s alert level 2 despite facing retaliatory attacks amid growing hostilities with most neighboring countries.

“It’s time to review the policy,” said Raymond Palatino, former congressman and current secretary general of BAYAN, the Philippines’ largest alliance of grassroots groups.

“Given the worsening situation today, the government should at least consider suspending the deployment of workers to Israel.”

He told Arab News that while the Philippines was already repatriating its nationals from Israel, it was still allowing new batches of workers to go there and “face the same risks in their destination.”

Marissa Magsino, lawmaker representing overseas Filipino workers in Congress, also pressed for the deployment to be suspended.

“The Philippines should not continue to send its workforce to Israel due to the ongoing conflict and security risks,” she said. “The safety of the workers must come first.”

There are about 27,000 Filipinos in Israel, mostly caregivers, according to data from the Middle East chapter of Migrante, a global alliance of overseas Filipino workers. Some 900 of them have returned to the Philippines since October last year, when Israel began its deadly war on Gaza, which this month expanded to Lebanon as well.

“OFWs (Overseas Filipino Workers) in Israel are not really safe because Israel is at war and is continually fanning the flames of conflict against Iran, Lebanon, Palestine and other countries in the region. In fact, its so-called Iron Dome defense system was already breached,” Migrante told Arab News, referring to the recent Iranian strikes on Tel Aviv, where missiles penetrated the system designed to intercept rockets.

Migrante said its call to stop worker deployment was not only driven by security considerations, but also Israel’s ongoing destruction and indiscriminate killing of civilians in Gaza, over which it is a defendant in a genocide case at the International Court of Justice.

It said the Philippine government should ban sending workers to Israel “as a matter of expressing its discontent with the government of Israel for illegally occupying Palestinian lands and for its war crimes against the people of Palestine.”

Since the deadly onslaught on Gaza began on Oct. 7, Israeli forces have killed more than 42,000 Palestinians and wounded in excess of 97,000 others, according to estimates from the enclave’s Health Ministry.

However, the real toll is feared to be much higher. A study published by the medical journal The Lancet estimated earlier this year that the true number of those killed could be more than 186,000, taking into consideration indirect deaths as a result of starvation, injury and lack of access to medical aid as Israeli forces have destroyed most of Gaza’s infrastructure and continued to block the entry of aid.


Tug of war: how US presidents battle Congress for military powers

Updated 01 March 2026
Follow

Tug of war: how US presidents battle Congress for military powers

  • The last official declaration of war by Congress was as far back as World War II

WASHINGTON, United States: Donald Trump’s unleashing of operation “Epic Fury” against Iran has once more underscored the long and bitter struggle between US presidents and Congress over who has the power to decide on foreign military action.
In his video address announcing “major combat” with the Islamic republic, Trump didn’t once mention any authorization or consultation with the US House of Representatives or Senate.
In doing so he sidelined not only Democrats, who called for an urgent war powers vote, but also his own Republican party as he asserts his dominance over a largely cowed legislature.
A US official said Secretary of State Marco Rubio had called top congressional leaders known as the “Gang of Eight” to give them a heads up on the Iran attack — adding that one was unreachable.
Rubio also “laid out the situation” and consulted with the same leaders on Tuesday in an hour-long briefing, the US official said.
According to the US Constitution, only Congress can declare war.
But at the same time the founding document of the United States first signed in 1787 says that the president is the “commander in chief” of the military, a definition that US leaders have in recent years taken very broadly.
The last official declaration of war by Congress was as far back as World War II.
There was no such proclamation during the unpopular Vietnam War, and it was then that Congress sought to reassert its powers.
In 1973 it adopted the War Powers Resolution, passed over Richard Nixon’s veto, to become the only lasting limit on unilateral presidential military action abroad.
The act allows the president to carry out a limited military intervention to respond to an urgent situation created by an attack against the United States.
In his video address on Saturday, Trump evoked an “imminent” threat to justify strikes against Iran.

- Sixty days -

Yet under this law, the president must still inform Congress within 48 hours.
It also says that if the president deploys US troops for a military action for more than 60 days, the head of state must then obtain the authorization of Congress for continued action.
That falls short of an official declaration of war.
The US Congress notably authorized the use of force in such a way after the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States by Al-Qaeda. Presidents have used it over the past two decades for not only the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan but a series of operations in several countries linked to the “War on Terror.”
Trump is far from the first US president to launch military operations without going through Congress.
Democrat Bill Clinton launched US air strikes against Kosovo in 1999 as part of a NATO campaign, despite the lack of a green light from skeptical lawmakers.
Barack Obama did the same for airstrikes in Libya in 2011.
Trump followed their example in his first term in 2018 when he launched airstrikes in Syria along with Britain and France.
But since his return to power the 79-year-old has sought to push presidential power to its limits, and that includes in the military sphere.
Trump has ordered strikes on alleged drug trafficking boats in Latin America without consulting Congress, and in June 2025 struck Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Perhaps the most controversial act was when he ordered the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro in a lightning military raid on January 3.
Republicans however managed to knock down moves by Democrats for a rare war powers resolution that would have curbed his authority over Venezuela operations.
Trump has meanwhile sought to extend his powers over the home front. Democrats have slammed the Republican for deploying the National Guard in several US cities in what he calls a crackdown on crime and immigration.