Older generations more likely to fall for AI-generated fake news, Global AI Summit hears

All of the panelists said that educating people is the key to finding the best way forward regarding the role of AI in the media. (AN/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 September 2024
Follow

Older generations more likely to fall for AI-generated fake news, Global AI Summit hears

  • Semafor co-founder Ben Smith says he is ‘much more worried about Gen X and older people’ falling for misinformation than younger generations

RIYADH: Media experts are concerned that older generations are more susceptible to AI-generated deep fakes and misinformation than younger people, the audience at the Global AI Summit in Riyadh heard on Tuesday.

“I am so much more worried about Gen X (those born between 1965 and 1980) and older people,” Semafor co-founder and editor-in-chief Ben Smith said during a panel titled “AI and the Future of Media: Threats and Opportunities.”

He added: “I think that young people, for better and for worse, really have learned to be skeptical, and to immediately be skeptical, of anything they’re presented with — of images, of videos, of claims — and to try to figure out where they’re getting it.”

Smith was joined during the discussion, moderated by Arab News Editor-in-Chief Faisal Abbas, by the vice president and editor-in-chief of CNN Arabic, Caroline Faraj, and Anthony Nakache, the managing director of Google MENA.




Semafor co-founder and editor-in-chief Ben Smith.

They said that AI, as a tool, is too important not to be properly regulated. In particular they highlighted its potential for verification of facts and content creation in the media industry, but said educating people about its uses is crucial.

“We have always been looking at how we can build AI in a very safe and responsible way,” said Nakache, who added that Google is working with governments and agencies to figure out the best way to go about this.

The integration of AI into journalism requires full transparency, the panelists agreed. Faraj said the technology offers a multifunctional tool that can be used for several purposes, including data verification, transcription and translation. But to ensure a report contains the full and balanced truth, a journalist will still always be needed to confirm the facts using their professional judgment.

The panelists also agreed that AI would not take important jobs from humans in the industry, as it is designed to complete repetitive manual tasks, freeing up more of a journalist’s time to interact with people and their environment.

“Are you really going to use AI go to a war zone and to the front line to cover stories? Of course not,” said Faraj.




Vice president and editor-in-chief of CNN Arabic, Caroline Faraj.

Smith, who has written a book on news sites and viral content, warned about the unethical ways in which some media outlets knowingly use AI-generated content because they “get addicted” to the traffic such content can generate.

All of the panelists said that educating people is the key to finding the best way forward regarding the role of AI in the media. Nakache said Google has so far trained 20,000 journalists in the region to better equip them with knowledge of how to use digital tools, and funds organizations in the region making innovative use of technology.

“It is a collective effort and we are taking our responsibility,” he added.




Anthony Nakache, the managing director of Google MENA.

The panelists also highlighted some of the methods that can be used to combat confusion and prevent misinformation related to the use of AI, including the use of digital watermarks and programs that can analyze content and inform users if it was AI-generated.

Asked how traditional media organizations can best teach their audiences how to navigate the flood of deep fakes and misinformation, while still delivering the kind of content they want, Faraj said: “You listen to them. We listen to our audience and we hear exactly what they wanted to do and how we can enable them.

“We enable them and equip them with the knowledge. Sometimes we offer training, sometimes we offer listening; but listening is a must before taking any action.”


Iceland joins Eurovision boycott over Israel’s participation

Updated 10 December 2025
Follow

Iceland joins Eurovision boycott over Israel’s participation

  • Decision follows similar moves by Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland and Slovenia over the Gaza war
  • Iceland’s national broadcaster says it pulled out 'given the public debate' in the country

LONDON: Iceland’s national broadcaster said Wednesday it will boycott next year’s Eurovision Song Contest because of discord over Israel’s participation, joining four other countries in a walkout of the pan-continental music competition.
Broadcasters in Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland and Slovenia told contest organizer the European Broadcasting Union last week that they will not take part in the contest in Vienna in May after organizers declined to expel Israel over its conduct of the war against Hamas in Gaza.
The board of Iceland’s RÚV met Wednesday to make a decision.
At its conclusion the broadcaster said in a statement that “given the public debate in this country ... it is clear that neither joy nor peace will prevail regarding the participation of RÚV in Eurovision. It is therefore the conclusion of RÚV to notify the EBU today that RÚV will not take part in Eurovision next year.”
“The Song Contest and Eurovision have always had the aim of uniting the Icelandic nation but it is now clear that this aim cannot be achieved and it is on these program-related grounds that this decision is taken,” the broadcaster said.
Last week the general assembly of the EBU — a group of public broadcasters from 56 countries that runs Eurovision — met to discuss concerns about Israel’s participation. Members voted to adopt tougher contest voting rules in response to allegations that Israel manipulated the vote in favor of its competitor, but took no action to exclude any broadcaster from the competition.
The pullouts include some big names in the Eurovision world. Spain is one of the “Big Five” large-market countries that contribute the most to the contest. Ireland has won seven times, a record it shares with Sweden.
Iceland, a volcanic North Atlantic island nation with a population of 360,000, has never won but has the highest per capita viewing audience of any country.
The walkouts cast a cloud over the future of what’s meant to be a feel-good cultural party marked by friendly rivalry and disco beats, dealing a blow to fans, broadcasters and the contest’s finances.
The contest, which turns 70 in 2026, strives to put pop before politics, but has repeatedly been embroiled in world events. Russia was expelled in 2022 after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
It has been roiled by the war in Gaza for the past two years, stirring protests outside the venues and forcing organizers to clamp down on political flag-waving.
Opponents of Israel’s participation cite the war in Gaza, where more than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the territory’s Health Ministry, which operates under the Hamas-run government and whose detailed records are viewed as generally reliable by the international community.
Israel’s government has repeatedly defended its campaign as a response to the attack by Hamas-led militants on Oct. 7, 2023. The militants killed around 1,200 people — mostly civilians — in the attack and took 251 hostage.
A number of experts, including those commissioned by a UN body, have said that Israel’s offensive in Gaza amounts to genocide, a claim Israel has vigorously denied.
Wednesday marked the final day for national broadcasters to announce whether they planned to participate. More than two dozen countries have confirmed they will attend the contest in Vienna, and the EBU says a final list of competing nations will be published before Christmas.