LAGOS/JOHANNESBURG: Mpox is nothing new to Africa yet there is no vaccine available on the continent, exposing rank inequity in global distribution as tens of richer nations inoculate people facing far less risk.
Experts say that inequality — alongside competing health problems and slow regulation — is putting millions of Africans in jeopardy, after scientists found the virus was now mutating fast, leaping from person to person and stealing over borders.
“The lack in the distribution of mpox vaccines in Africa is due to challenges in supply, funding, and infrastructure, and because the disease is less prevalent compared to other health priorities,” Duduzile Ndwandwe, a scientist at the South African Medical Research Council (SAMARA), said in emailed comments.
Mpox had been circulating in the Democratic Republic of Congo since January last year but only became a grave concern this January when scientists spotted the worrying, new mutation.
Two mpox vaccines made by Denmark’s Bavarian Nordic and Japan’s KM Biologics used to combat a 2022 outbreak have been widely available in at least 70 countries outside Africa — even administered for free in some US and European clinics.
But before Nigeria received 10,000 doses from the United States this week, no mpox vaccine was available — in any country — in Africa, and the variant now circling vulnerable, displaced populations in DRC is even more virulent than previous strains.
’A serious epidemic’
Mpox, formerly known as monkey pox, has been a public health problem in parts of Africa since 1970, but received little global attention until an international outbreak in 2022.
It typically causes flu-like symptoms, pus-filled lesions and can kill. Protection costs about $100 a person.
Jimmy Whitworth, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, described the new variant, clade 1b pox, as “fairly lethal.”
“This appears to be from sexual contact that it’s spreading, and this time it is going from person to person,” Whitworth said. “There’s now a need to raise it to the priority list because this is a serious epidemic.”
Since January 2023, there have been more than 27,000 suspected cases and 1,100 deaths in Congo, according to government figures, mainly among children.
The viral infection has spread from DRC to 12 neighboring countries, leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to designate the outbreak a public health emergency.
Many African nations are struggling to meet the challenge.
Whitworth said the $100 needed to distribute a dose of the vaccine is prohibitive for governments who must quash multiple threats — measles, malaria, cholera — with limited budgets.
“It is a huge expense to vaccinate just DRC. If you asked people in DRC last year what the higher priority was, ‘was it the measles or mpox vaccine?’ They would have said ‘measles vaccine’. And so would anybody else in public health because that was a bigger threat then,” the epidemiologist said.
National regulations are also a problem.
Despite the severity of the mpox crisis and the risk of it spreading across DRC’s borders, local regulators only approved a vaccine in June with no date yet set for distribution.
Why the delay?
In 2022, two mpox vaccines, along with public health campaigns against risky behavior, effectively controlled an outbreak that had hit 100 countries globally.
But African countries have so far remained underserved, with efforts only now ramping up to bolster their protection.
Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) said it had been granted 9.34 million euros ($10.43 million) in emergency funding from the Africa Union for its mpox response and it said it would need 10 million doses of vaccines.
Bavarian Nordic said it can make 10 million doses of its vaccine by end-2025 and offered 2 million doses this year.
The WHO gave its partner agencies, including global vaccine organization Gavi and UNICEF, the go-ahead to buy mpox vaccines pre-approval to speed their delivery to Africa.
DRC had expected to receive its first vaccines in the week of Aug. 26 after the United States and Japan both promised deliveries, but has since said it would take longer.
European Union countries have also pledged donations to help Africa fight the current outbreak.
Whitworth said regulators in Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda and Kenya, all countries where cases have been detected, should approve vaccines urgently without waiting for a full outbreak.
“The vaccine isn’t even licensed in those countries,” said Whitworth. “Those countries … need to speed up the process.”
Weak health system
Even pre-mpox, Congo’s health system was at breaking point — weighed down by epidemics of measles and Ebola and years of conflict — and campaigners say short-term fixes won’t work.
Katharina Schroeder from Save the Children said long-term investment in social welfare and health care infrastructure were vital to prevent future outbreaks, with many remote health centers lacking basic testing kits or trained staff.
“The health centers outside the city need to be equipped to triage patients … because often they’re looking for things like gloves and masks,” Schroeder said.
Save the Children has been training staff on the disease, but even when diagnoses are successfully sped through, few sick patients can then afford to isolate for the mandated four weeks.
“They understand this is mpox, they understand this is dangerous for their family. But they still don’t go into isolation because they live day by day. They don’t have enough to eat,” Schroeder said.
There is an mpox jab. Why is it taking so long to reach Africa?
Short Url
https://arab.news/wyfar
There is an mpox jab. Why is it taking so long to reach Africa?
- Nigeria is the only African country with doses
- New variant fairly lethal, experts say
US lifts some Venezuela sanctions to ease oil sales
- Broad US license eases some sanctions on Venezuelan oil
- Does not ease measures on production of Venezuelan crude
WASHINGTON: The administration of President Donald Trump lifted some sanctions on Venezuela’s oil industry on Thursday to make it easier for US companies to sell its crude oil, and said more restrictions on the country would be lifted soon.
The move by the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control authorizes US companies to buy, sell, transport, store and refine Venezuelan crude oil, but does not lift existing US sanctions on production.
A White House official said the measure “would help flow existing product” from Venezuela and that there will soon be more announcements on the easing of sanctions.
Trump has said the United States intends to control Venezuela’s oil sales and revenues indefinitely since US forces seized the country’s leader Nicolas Maduro in a raid on the capital Caracas on January 3.
He has said he also wants US oil companies to eventually invest $100 billion dollars to restore the OPEC-member nation’s production to its historic peaks following years of underinvestment and mismanagement.
In the meantime, Washington and Caracas have already agreed an initial deal to sell 50 million barrels of Venezuelan crude oil, with European trading houses Vitol and Trafigura marketing the supply.
Treasury’s new authorization, known as a general license, opens up Venezuela oil trade to additional companies, provided they are from the United States.
It allows transactions involving the government of Venezuela and state oil company PDVSA related to “the lifting, exportation, reexportation, sale, resale, supply, storage, marketing, purchase, delivery, or transportation of Venezuelan-origin oil, including the refining of such oil, by an established US entity.”
It specifically excludes firms and individuals from rivals like China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Russia.
During President Donald Trump’s first administration, Treasury designated Venezuela’s entire energy industry as subject to US sanctions in 2019 after Maduro’s first re-election, which Washington did not recognize.
The new license does not authorize any payment terms that are not commercially reasonable, involve debt swaps or payments in gold, or are denominated in digital currency.
America first
Oil producers Chevron, Repsol and ENI, refiner Reliance Industries, and some US oil service providers had sought licenses in recent weeks to expand output or exports from the OPEC member.
Expanding production in the country would require additional US authorizations.
Jeremy Paner, a lawyer at Hughes Hubbard & Reed and a former OFAC sanctions investigator, said the authorization is broad in the sense that it opens up many operations including refining, transportation and “lifting” of Venezuelan oil.
But he said the scope is narrow in that it only applies to US companies.
Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, said the authorization could provide clarity for US companies while maintaining the previous standard of case-by-case review for non-US entities.
“In short, it appears to offer ‘America First, Others Ask’ sanctions relief.”
The large number of individual requests to the US government had delayed progress on plans to expand exports and get investment moving quickly into Venezuela, two sources said this week.
The new OFAC license, meanwhile, came as lawmakers in Venezuela on Thursday approved a sweetened reform of the country’s main oil law that is expected to grant autonomy to private producers in joint ventures or under new contracts to operate their projects and commercialize the output.
It also formalizes an oil production-sharing model first introduced by Maduro and negotiated with little-known energy firms in recent years.
Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin American Energy Program at Rice University’s Baker Institute in Houston, said he wondered if the exclusion of Russian and Chinese entities would make it hard for PDVSA to operate or market oil from those ventures. Ventures with those countries produce about 22 percent of the oil, he said.
“If they cannot export the oil coming from these ventures, that’s a big problem.”
The move by the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control authorizes US companies to buy, sell, transport, store and refine Venezuelan crude oil, but does not lift existing US sanctions on production.
A White House official said the measure “would help flow existing product” from Venezuela and that there will soon be more announcements on the easing of sanctions.
Trump has said the United States intends to control Venezuela’s oil sales and revenues indefinitely since US forces seized the country’s leader Nicolas Maduro in a raid on the capital Caracas on January 3.
He has said he also wants US oil companies to eventually invest $100 billion dollars to restore the OPEC-member nation’s production to its historic peaks following years of underinvestment and mismanagement.
In the meantime, Washington and Caracas have already agreed an initial deal to sell 50 million barrels of Venezuelan crude oil, with European trading houses Vitol and Trafigura marketing the supply.
Treasury’s new authorization, known as a general license, opens up Venezuela oil trade to additional companies, provided they are from the United States.
It allows transactions involving the government of Venezuela and state oil company PDVSA related to “the lifting, exportation, reexportation, sale, resale, supply, storage, marketing, purchase, delivery, or transportation of Venezuelan-origin oil, including the refining of such oil, by an established US entity.”
It specifically excludes firms and individuals from rivals like China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Russia.
During President Donald Trump’s first administration, Treasury designated Venezuela’s entire energy industry as subject to US sanctions in 2019 after Maduro’s first re-election, which Washington did not recognize.
The new license does not authorize any payment terms that are not commercially reasonable, involve debt swaps or payments in gold, or are denominated in digital currency.
America first
Oil producers Chevron, Repsol and ENI, refiner Reliance Industries, and some US oil service providers had sought licenses in recent weeks to expand output or exports from the OPEC member.
Expanding production in the country would require additional US authorizations.
Jeremy Paner, a lawyer at Hughes Hubbard & Reed and a former OFAC sanctions investigator, said the authorization is broad in the sense that it opens up many operations including refining, transportation and “lifting” of Venezuelan oil.
But he said the scope is narrow in that it only applies to US companies.
Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, said the authorization could provide clarity for US companies while maintaining the previous standard of case-by-case review for non-US entities.
“In short, it appears to offer ‘America First, Others Ask’ sanctions relief.”
The large number of individual requests to the US government had delayed progress on plans to expand exports and get investment moving quickly into Venezuela, two sources said this week.
The new OFAC license, meanwhile, came as lawmakers in Venezuela on Thursday approved a sweetened reform of the country’s main oil law that is expected to grant autonomy to private producers in joint ventures or under new contracts to operate their projects and commercialize the output.
It also formalizes an oil production-sharing model first introduced by Maduro and negotiated with little-known energy firms in recent years.
Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin American Energy Program at Rice University’s Baker Institute in Houston, said he wondered if the exclusion of Russian and Chinese entities would make it hard for PDVSA to operate or market oil from those ventures. Ventures with those countries produce about 22 percent of the oil, he said.
“If they cannot export the oil coming from these ventures, that’s a big problem.”
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.










