India’s climate leadership is an example to the world

India has assumed a pivotal role in its efforts to tackle climate change, as a leading voice on sustainability. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 August 2024
Follow

India’s climate leadership is an example to the world

  • Country’s per-capita carbon footprint is lowest among G20 nations

NEW DELHI: India is the world’s largest country in terms of population, comprising about 17 percent of the global total. It is also the fifth-largest economy in the world and on its way to becoming the third-largest by 2030.

Yet its contribution to cumulative carbon dioxide emissions since the industrial revolution is a mere 3.4 percent of the global total. And at 2 tonnes, its per-capita emissions are less than half the global average of 4.7 tonnes.

India’s per-capita carbon footprint is also the lowest among G20 countries, and the International Finance Corporation has acknowledged that the nation is the only G20 member that is in line with the international target of limiting warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius compared with preindustrial levels.

Additionally, the IFC has highlighted the fact that India’s gross domestic product grew by a compound annual growth rate of about 7 percent between 2005 and 2019, while emissions increased at a CAGR of about 4 percent. This would appear to underscore India’s relative success in decoupling economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions, thereby reducing the “emission intensity” of its GDP and becoming a possible model for the world in general and the Global South in particular.

Leading India’s determination to be part of the global solution to climate change, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced in November 2021, during the UN Climate Change Conference, COP26, in Glasgow, Scotland, a five-point climate-action plan for India, called Panchamrit. It included the key commitment of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070, and four goals to help achieve this, which were later incorporated into India’s nationally determined contributions to the international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

These goals are: 500 gigawatts of non-fossil fuel power generation by 2030; 50 percent of India’s power requirements met by renewable energy by 2030; reduction of total projected carbon emissions by 1 billion tonnes by 2030; and a reduction of the economy’s carbon intensity by 45 percent by 2030 compared with 2005.

Many of these goals upped the already significant targets India had set for itself following COP21 in Paris in 2015. This increased ambition was possible because India had achieved its nationally determined contributions well ahead of time.

In fact, with regard to the use of non-fossil fuel resources for energy, India achieved its goal of 40 percent of cumulative electrical power installation capacity provided by non-fossil-fuel-based energy sources in 2021, nine years ahead of the target of 2030. Furthermore, between 2017 and 2023, India added about 100 gigawatts of installed electrical capacity, of which about 80 percent was attributed to non-fossil-fuel-based resources. Now, the share of non-fossil-fuel-based resources in installed electricity capacity has reached 45.4 percent.

India also met its key initial target of a 33 percent reduction in the emissions intensity of GDP by 2030, compared with the 2005 level, in 2019, 11 years early.

Aside from the four goals of its Panchamrit pathway, India has also undertaken to create a carbon sink that can handle an additional 2.5-3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, through the provision of additional forest and tree cover by 2030. So far, the country has created carbon sinks with a capacity of about 1.97 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, putting it on track to achieve this nationally determined contribution.

Through its ambitious policies, successful renewable-energy growth trajectory and achievement of international commitments, India has strongly demonstrated climate leadership at a global level.

With climate change seen by many as the defining challenge of our time, India has assumed a pivotal role in the efforts to tackle the issue, both in terms of its actions and as the leading voice of the Global South on sustainability.

• Manjeev S. Puri is the former ambassador of India to the EU and lead negotiator at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.


The shootings in Minneapolis are upending the politics of immigration in Congress

Updated 27 January 2026
Follow

The shootings in Minneapolis are upending the politics of immigration in Congress

  • Many GOP lawmakers continue to embrace the Trump administration’s deportation strategy

WASHINGTON: The shooting deaths of two American citizens during the Trump administration’s deportation operations in Minneapolis have upended the politics of immigration in Congress, plunging the country toward another government shutdown.
Democrats have awakened to what they see as a moral moment for the country, refusing funds for the Department of Homeland Security’s military-style immigration enforcement operations unless there are new restraints. Two former presidents, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, have broken from retirement to speak out.
At the same time, Republicans who have championed President Donald Trump’s tough approach to immigration are signaling second thoughts. A growing number of Republicans want a full investigation into the shooting death of Alex Pretti and congressional hearings about US Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations.
“Americans are horrified & don’t want their tax dollars funding this brutality,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., wrote on social media. “Not another dime to this lawless operation.”
The result is a rapidly changing political environment as the nation considers the reach of the Trump administration’s well-funded immigration enforcement machinery and Congress spirals toward a partial federal shutdown if no resolution is reached by midnight Friday.
“The tragic death of Alex Pretti has refocused attention on the Homeland Security bill, and I recognize and share the concerns,” said Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the GOP chair of the Appropriations Committee, in brief remarks Monday.
Still, she urged colleagues to stick to the funding deal and avoid a “detrimental shutdown.”
Searching for a way out of a crisis
As Congress seeks to defuse a crisis, the next steps are uncertain.
The White House has indicated its own shifting strategy, sending Trump’s border czar Tom Homan to Minneapolis to take over for hard-charging Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, which many Republicans see as a potential turning point to calm operations.
“This is a positive development — one that I hope leads to turning down the temperature and restoring order in Minnesota,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune posted about Homan.
Behind the scenes, the White House is reaching out to congressional leaders, and even individual Democratic senators, in search of a way out of another government shutdown.
At stake is a six-bill government funding package, not just for Homeland Security but for Defense, Health and other departments, making up more than 70 percent of federal operations.
Even though Homeland Security has billions from Trump’s big tax break bill, Democrats are coalescing around changes to ICE operations. “We can still have some legitimate restriction on how these people are conducting themselves,” said Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona
But it appears doubtful the Trump administration would readily agree to Democrats’ demands to rein in immigration operations. Proposals for unmasking federal agents or limiting their reach into schools, hospitals or churches would be difficult to quickly approve in Congress.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that while conversations are underway, Trump wants to see the bipartisan spending package approved to avoid the possibility of a government shutdown.
“We absolutely do not want to see that funding lapse,” Leavitt said.
Politics reflect changing attitudes on Trump’s immigration agenda
The political climate is a turnaround from just a year ago, when Congress easily passed the Laken Riley Act, the first bill Trump signed into law in his second term.
At the time, dozens of Democrats joined the GOP majority in passing the bill named after a Georgia nursing student who was killed by a Venezuelan man who had entered the country illegally.
Many Democrats had worried about the Biden administration’s record of having allowed untold immigrants into the country. The party was increasingly seen as soft on crime following the “defund the police” protests and the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the the hands of law enforcement.
But the Trump administrations tactics changed all that.
Just 38 percent of US adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, down from 49 percent in March, according to an AP-NORC poll conducted in January, shortly after the death of Renee Good, who was shot and killed by a ICE officer in Minnesota.
Last week, almost all House Democrats voted against the Homeland Security bill, as the package was sent the Senate.
Then there was the shooting death of Pretti over the weekend in Minneapolis.
Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York, who was among the seven Democrats who had voted to approve the Homeland Security funds, reversed course Monday in a Facebook post.
“I hear the anger from my constituents, and I take responsibility for that,” Suozzi wrote.
He said he “failed to view the DHS funding vote as a referendum on the illegal and immoral conduct of ICE in Minneapolis.”
Voting ahead as shutdown risk grows
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said Monday the responsibility for averting another shutdown falls to Republicans, who have majority control, to break apart the six-bill package, removing the homeland funds while allowing the others to go forward.
“We can pass them right away,” Schumer said.
But the White House panned that approach and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has blamed Democrats for last year’s shutdown, the longest in history, has been mum. The GOP speaker would need to recall lawmakers to Washington to vote.
Republicans believe they will be able to portray Democrats as radical if the government shuts down over Homeland Security funds, and certain centrist Democrats have warned the party against strong anti-ICE language.
A memo from centrist Democratic group Third Way had earlier warned lawmakers against proposals to “abolish” ICE as “emotionally satisfying, politically lethal.” In a new memo Monday it proposed “Overhauling ICE” with top-to-bottom changes, including removing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem from her job.
GOP faces a divide on deportations
But Republicans also risk being sideways with public opinion over Trump’s immigration and deportation agenda.
Republicans prefer to keep the focus on Trump’s ability to secure the US-Mexico border, with illegal crossings at all-time lows, instead of the military-style deportation agenda. They are particularly sensitive to concerns from gun owners’ groups that Pretti, who was apparently licensed to carry a firearm, is being criticized for having a gun with him before he was killed.
GOP Sen. Rand Paul, the chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Oversight Committee, demanded that acting ICE director Todd Lyons appear for a hearing — joining a similar demand from House Republicans over the weekend.
At the same time, many GOP lawmakers continue to embrace the Trump administration’s deportation strategy.
“I want to be very clear,” said Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., in a post. “I will not support any efforts to strip DHS of its funding.”
And pressure from their own right flank was bearing down on Republicans.
The Heritage Foundation chastised those Republicans who were “jubilant” at the prospect of slowing down ICE operations. “Deport every illegal alien,” it said in a post. “Nothing less.”