South Africa makes urgent appeal to International Court of Justice over Rafah offensive

A woman sits by packed belongings near a tent at a camp before fleeing from Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on February 13, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 February 2024
Follow

South Africa makes urgent appeal to International Court of Justice over Rafah offensive

  • Johannesburg says an Israeli military assault on the city would be in breach of Genocide Convention and the ICJ’s Jan. 26 ruling on the war in Gaza
  • More than half of Gaza’s 2.3m population is now in Rafah; Israeli PM last week said troops were preparing for a ground offensive there

NEW YORK CITY: South Africa on Tuesday made an urgent request for the International Court of Justice to consider whether the decision by Israeli authorities to expand their military operations into Rafah requires the court to use its powers to prevent further imminent breaches of the rights of Palestinians in Gaza.

Rafah, the last refuge for displaced Palestinians in the territory, has come under heavy fire from Israeli air strikes in recent days and at least 74 people reportedly have been killed.

Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had ordered his troops to prepare for a ground offensive in the southern city.

UN human rights chief Volker Turk on Monday warned that any assault there would be “terrifying, given the prospect that an extremely high number of civilians, again mostly children and women, will likely be killed and injured.”

He added: “Israel must comply with the legally binding orders issued by the International Court of Justice, and with the full span of international humanitarian law. Those who defy international law have been put on notice: accountability must follow.

“The world must not allow this to happen. Those with influence must restrain rather than enable. There must be an immediate ceasefire. All remaining hostages must be released.”

More than half of the Gaza Strip’s population of 2.3 million people is now crammed into Rafah, a city near the border with Egypt that was home to only 250,000 people before the war began in October.

Many of the displaced live in makeshift shelters or tents in squalid conditions, with little or no access to safe drinking water or food.

ICJ rules stipulate that “the Court may at any time decide to examine … whether the circumstances of the case require the indication of provisional measures which ought to be taken or complied with by any or all of the parties.”

In its request to the court, submitted on Monday, the South African government said it was gravely concerned that the “unprecedented military” offensive in Rafah has already caused and will result “in further large-scale killing, harm and destruction.”

It added: “This would be in serious and irreparable breach both of the Genocide Convention and of the court’s order of Jan. 26, 2024.”

In its ruling last month, the ICJ ordered six provisional measures be taken, including obligations on Israeli authorities to refrain from actions contrary to the the Genocide Convention, to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to genocide, and to take immediate action to ensure the flow of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza.


Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Trump sues the BBC for defamation over editing of January 6 speech, seeks up to $10 billion in damages

  • A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point
  • The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught

WASHING: President Donald Trump sued the BBC on Monday for defamation over edited clips of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the US Capitol, opening an international front in his fight against media coverage he deems untrue or unfair. Trump accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021 speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell.” It omitted a section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts. The BBC has apologized to Trump, admitted an error of judgment and acknowledged that the edit gave the mistaken impression that he had made a direct call for violent action. But it has said there is no legal basis to sue.
Trump, in his lawsuit filed Monday in Miami federal court, said the BBC despite its apology “has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses.”
The BBC is funded through a mandatory license fee on all TV viewers, which UK lawyers say could make any payout to Trump politically fraught.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement the BBC “has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda.”
A BBC spokesperson told Reuters earlier on Monday that it had “no further contact from President Trump’s lawyers at this point. Our position remains the same.” The broadcaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment after the lawsuit was filed.

CRISIS LED TO RESIGNATIONS
Facing one of the biggest crises in its 103-year history, the BBC has said it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
The dispute over the clip, featured on the BBC’s “Panorama” documentary show shortly before the 2024 presidential election, sparked a public relations crisis for the broadcaster, leading to the resignations of its two most senior officials.
Trump’s lawyers say the BBC caused him overwhelming reputational and financial harm.
The documentary drew scrutiny after the leak of a BBC memo by an external standards adviser that raised concerns about how it was edited, part of a wider investigation of political bias at the publicly funded broadcaster.
The documentary was not broadcast in the United States.
Trump may have sued in the US because defamation claims in Britain must be brought within a year of publication, a window that has closed for the “Panorama” episode.
To overcome the US Constitution’s legal protections for free speech and the press, Trump will need to prove not only that the edit was false and defamatory but also that the BBC knowingly misled viewers or acted recklessly.
The broadcaster could argue that the documentary was substantially true and its editing decisions did not create a false impression, legal experts said. It could also claim the program did not damage Trump’s reputation.
Other media have settled with Trump, including CBS and ABC when Trump sued them following his comeback win in the November 2024 election.
Trump has filed lawsuits against the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and a newspaper in Iowa, all three of which have denied wrongdoing. The attack on the US Capitol in January 2021 was aimed at blocking Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s presidential win over Trump in the 2020 US election.