All eyes today on Pakistan Supreme Court hearings on military courts

Motorists drive past Pakistan's Supreme Court in Islamabad on April 5, 2022. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 22 June 2023
Follow

All eyes today on Pakistan Supreme Court hearings on military courts

  • Military has said it would try those suspected of attacking army properties last month following arrest of ex-PM Khan
  • Khan says purpose of military courts is to put him in prison and dismantle his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party

ISLAMABAD: A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, will take up today, Thursday, a set of four petitions challenging the trial of civilians in military courts.

Pakistan’s government and army have said they will try in military courts suspects accused of attacking army installations in countrywide protests in the wake of the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khan last month.

Military courts operate under a separate system from the civilian legal system. Trials are closed to outsiders, and no media is allowed. Rights groups have criticized the secretive nature of the process.

Four petitions have been filed against the use of military courts to try civilians by, namely, former Chief Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, prominent lawyer and politician Aitzaz Ahsan, Pakistan Institute of Labour Education and Research Chef Executive Karamat Ali and former PM Khan.

“The former CJP pleaded that Section 2(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Pakistan Army Act were inconsistent with the fundamental rights conferred by the Constitution and therefore void and should be struck down,” Dawn reported on Thursday.

Separately, Prime Minister’s Special Adviser on Accountability Irfan Qadir condemned the petition filed by ex-CJ Khawaja, saying it was unprecedented that a former chief justice was coming as a litigant to the top court where he had served as the top judge.

“Never in the judicial history of Pakistan, any CJP made himself a party especially in a case when there seemed to be a divide in the Supreme Court and when the military installations had been attacked with impunity,” Qadir said while talking to the media.

Qadir cited the example of Article VI of the Code of Conduct for the superior court judges which states: “A judge should endeavour to avoid, as far as possible, being involved, either on his own behalf or on behalf of others, in litigation or in matters which are liable to lead to litigation such as industry, trade or speculative transactions.”

A bruising year-long standoff between Khan, arguably Pakistan’s most popular leader, and the army came to a head when military buildings and property were ransacked last month, allegedly by Khan supporters, following his arrest in a graft case. Khan was later released on bail but hundreds of his followers were arrested in the aftermath and the military said it would punish all those who had damaged military properties or instigated people to do so. 

Many of the top members of Khan’s party have since jumped ship and the government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has threatened to ban his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party.

Meanwhile, authorities have begun the process of trying dozens of people, including members of Khan’s party, suspected of involvement in the protests in military courts, usually reserved for service members or those categorized as enemies of the state. Khan says the purpose of military courts in this case is to put him in prison and dismantle his party.

Pakistan’s Army Act of 1952 established military courts primarily to try members of the military or enemies of the state. Civilians can only be tried there under a federal government order.

Civilians accused of offenses such as waging war against the armed forces or law enforcement agencies, or attacking military installations or inciting mutiny, can be tried at military courts.


Pakistan graft survey echoes IMF warning on weak governance, public dissatisfaction

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan graft survey echoes IMF warning on weak governance, public dissatisfaction

  • Most Pakistanis say they were not compelled to pay bribes, but distrust remains high in anti-corruption efforts
  • PM Shahbaz Sharif calls report a recognition of his government’s efforts to fight corruption, promote transparency

ISLAMABAD: Governance weaknesses flagged by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) appeared to align with findings from Pakistan’s latest corruption perception survey, analysts said on Tuesday, as Transparency International Pakistan (TI-Pakistan) reported widespread public dissatisfaction with the state’s accountability mechanisms.

TI-Pakistan’s National Corruption Perception Survey (NCPS) 2025 found that 58 percent of respondents fully or partly agreed that the IMF program and Pakistan’s removal from the Financial Action Task Force’s grey list had helped stabilize the economy.

“Encouragingly, a majority of Pakistanis (66 percent) nationwide reported that they did not experience a situation where they felt compelled to offer a bribe to access any public service,” said the survey. “Sindh recorded the highest proportion of respondents paying a bribe to access public service (46 percent), followed by Punjab (39 percent), Balochistan (31 percent) and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (20 percent).”

In this context, 77 percent said they were unhappy with the government’s anti-corruption performance.

However, Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif expressed satisfaction over the report in a statement, saying “a large majority of citizens said they did not face corruption during our government’s tenure” which is “recognition of our efforts to fight corruption and promote transparency.”

“It is highly encouraging that most citizens considered the government’s measures for economic recovery to be successful,” he said.

“We worked on a priority basis to establish a system grounded in merit and transparency across all sectors of government, and we are continuing to build on these efforts,” he added.

Economist and former finance ministry adviser Dr. Khaqan Najeeb said the survey highlighted the same structural weaknesses identified by the IMF’s Governance and Corruption Diagnostic, published on Nov. 20 at the international lender’s request, which said Pakistan suffers from “persistent and widespread corruption vulnerabilities” rooted in a state-dominated economy, weak regulatory capacity, and inconsistent enforcement.

“Transparency International Pakistan’s National Corruption Perception Survey does suggest progress in reducing low-level, day-to-day bribery, but it does not contradict the IMF’s governance findings,” he told Arab News. “Instead, it highlights that Pakistan’s real challenge lies in deeper, systemic weaknesses in transparency, oversight and institutional accountability.”

“While public perception has improved, it does not mean the underlying governance issues identified by the IMF have been resolved,” he argued, adding that addressing those will require sustained reforms, stronger institutions and consistent enforcement.

Political analyst Mazhar Abbas said the report was going to be used by the government to bolster its economic narrative.

“Survey reports have usually been tilted in favor of the government, and this report is no different,” he told Arab News. “The government will certainly use it to support its narrative of an improved economy, as the report states that a majority of respondents partially or fully agree that the government has successfully stabilized the economy through the IMF agreement and by exiting the FATF grey list.”

Abbas added it was difficult to either challenge or endorse the findings of the report without knowing who was interviewed and who the respondents were.

“The police have consistently been at the top of Transparency International’s corruption perception reports, whereas there may be other organizations where the frequency and volume of corruption are even higher,” he continued, adding that since the police are a public-dealing organization and consistently top the corruption perception index, it suggested that most respondents are from the general public, who may either lack access to or knowledge of corrupt practices in other organizations.

Islamabad-based social-sector development consultant Muhammad Qasim Jan said the survey should be seen as a barometer of public sentiment rather than an empirical measure of corruption.

“The National Corruption Perception Survey 2025 offers a sobering snapshot of how Pakistanis view corruption and accountability,” he told Arab News. “At the same time, the absence of basic methodological detail means the results should be interpreted with caution, especially when citing national percentages or making population-wide claims.”