Polls close in Turkiye with Erdogan facing toughest political test

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan greets his supporters after he casts his ballot at a polling station in Istanbul, Turkey, May 14, 2023. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 14 May 2023
Follow

Polls close in Turkiye with Erdogan facing toughest political test

  • Opposition promises return to parliamentary democracy rather than ‘one-man rule’ under presidential system

ANKARA: Turkish voters went to the polls on Sunday to elect their president and a new parliament for a five-year term against a domestic backdrop marked by the devastation of the February earthquakes and the country’s economic crisis.

Polls have increasingly shown opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu, the main challenger  to Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s 20-year reign, in the lead, with both presidential rivals hoping to get more than 50 percent of the vote in order to avoid a runoff vote.

More than 64 million people are eligible to vote in the high-stakes elections, and a historically high turnout is expected.

Voters from all walks of life have been mobilized over recent months, and long queues could be seen at polling stations in large cities, such as Ankara, Istanbul and Izmir.

The image of a voter still wearing her oxygen mask after coming from a hospital intensive care unit, and another who was brought to the polling station by ambulance, highlighted the high turnout rate.

A large voter turnout was also observed in Turkiye’s Kurdish-majority province of Diyarbakir, with Kurds likely to be the kingmakers, changing the balance in favor of Kilicdaroglu, who enjoys widespread support among Kurdish voters.

Meanwhile, tens of thousands of people have volunteered to monitor the voting and counting process.

According to Ziya Meral, senior associate fellow at the UK-based Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies, “it is one of strongest safety nets for limiting misappropriation.”

Meral told Arab News the large number of volunteers “shows the democratic resilience of the country, and how deeply people value elections and their role in democracy."

Up to half a million Turks will monitor the ballot boxes.

Several irregularities have been spotted by the election monitors and legal procedures launched.

More than 1.8 million Turks voted from abroad.

Kilicdaroglu addressed the public after casting his vote and said: “We missed being together, we missed democracy. Inshallah, the springs will come to this country,” a reference to his main campaign slogan, “I promise, the springs will come.”

Erdogan told reporters: “Inshallah, it will be a calm day for the good of Turkish democracy.”

Polls opened at 8 a.m. and closed at 5 p.m. local time, with the results due to be announced later on Sunday night.

The election is likely to have a major impact on the country’s future no matter who wins the presidency and the parliamentary majority.

The opposition promises a return to the parliamentary democracy rather than one-man rule of the presidential system.

For this to happen, however, it will need a parliamentary majority to be able to change the constitution.

It has been the most challenging race for Turkiye’s recent history after the 20-year reign of Erdogan.

In a symbolic move a day before the elections, Erdogan attended prayers at Hagia Sophia in Istanbul and recited verses from the Qur’an calling for unity among Muslims.

Kilicdaroglu, meanwhile, paid homage to the country’s founder with a visit to Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’s mausoleum in Ankara.

The opposition candidate recently accused Russia of spreading deep fake content in his rival’s favor, while Erdogan recently claimed US President Joe Biden was trying to oust him from power.

Experts say that if Erdogan is defeated, Turkiye will first have to deal with its economic problems and governance deficit in the public sector, while foreign policy will mostly remain unchanged in the short term.


How Gaza’s shattered fishing industry deepened the enclave’s food security crisis

Updated 19 February 2026
Follow

How Gaza’s shattered fishing industry deepened the enclave’s food security crisis

  • Once a pillar of local food security, Gaza’s fishing sector has been reduced to a fraction of its prewar capacity
  • UN agencies warn the destruction of boats and ports has deepened aid dependence and worsened protein shortages

DUBAI: Gaza’s fishing industry — once a critical source of food, income and affordable protein — has been largely destroyed as a result of Israel’s war with Hamas, worsening the Palestinian enclave’s food security crisis.

According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, fishing activity in Gaza now stands at less than 10 percent of prewar levels following the widespread destruction of boats, ports and equipment, combined with prolonged maritime closures enforced under Israel’s naval blockade.

UN and human rights organizations estimate that up to 72 percent of Gaza’s fishing fleet has been damaged or destroyed, alongside near-total devastation of related infrastructure, including landing sites, storage facilities and repair workshops.

Israel's naval blockade has Gaza's fishing industry to decline to about a tenth of pre-war levels. (Reuters photo)

The remaining vessels are small, damaged skiffs capable of operating only meters from shore.

Ramzy Baroud, a journalist, author and editor of The Palestine Chronicle, said the destruction of Gaza’s fishing sector must be understood as part of a deliberate policy aimed at preventing Palestinians from developing independent food-producing systems.

Baroud says Israel had pursued a strategy since 1967 to foster Palestinian dependency — first on the Israeli economy, and later on humanitarian aid entering Gaza through Israeli-controlled crossings — leaving the population permanently vulnerable to economic collapse.

“This vulnerability is functional for Israel, as it allows the Israeli government and military to leverage their control over Palestinian lives through political pressure in pursuit of concessions,” he told Arab News.

Palestinians were prevented from developing local industry through restrictions on imports and exports, while much of Gaza’s arable land was seized or turned into military targets, he said.

“Likewise, the fishing sector was deliberately crippled through direct attacks on fishermen, including arrests, live fire, confiscation of equipment, and the sinking or destruction of boats,” he added.

FAO has documented widespread destruction across Gaza’s coastal fishing areas.

“In Gaza’s fishing areas now lie broken boats, torn nets, and ruined infrastructure, standing in stark contrast to the once-vibrant industry that supported thousands of fishers for generations,” Beth Bechdol, FAO deputy director-general, said in a statement.

Before the war, more than 4,000 registered fishermen worked along Gaza’s 40-kilometer coastline, supporting tens of thousands of family members and contributing to local food security in an enclave heavily dependent on imports.

Today, the majority have been stripped of their livelihoods, as access to the sea has become sporadic, dangerous, or entirely prohibited.

For decades, fishing off Gaza was restricted to shifting maritime zones — typically between three and 12 nautical miles offshore — often tightened or closed entirely during periods of escalation.

Since October 2023, when the Israel-Hamas conflict began, humanitarian organizations say there have been extended periods of total maritime closure, effectively banning fishing and depriving Gaza’s population of one of its few remaining sources of local food production.

Baroud said the assault on Gaza’s fishing sector was not a by-product of war, but part of a deliberate strategy that intensified during the conflict.

“For Gaza, the sea represents freedom,” he said. “All of Gaza’s other borders are controlled by Israel, either directly or indirectly.”

Israel had consistently worked to deny Palestinians access to the sea, he said. And despite commitments under the Oslo Accords to allow fishing up to 20 nautical miles offshore, those provisions were never honored.

“The assault on Gaza’s fishing sector is therefore not incidental,” Baroud said. “It is about severing Palestinians from one of the few spaces not entirely enclosed by walls, checkpoints, and military control.”

Israel has generally rejected or not accepted accusations that it is unlawfully targeting Gaza’s fishermen, framing incidents at sea as enforcement of security zones or as under investigation rather than deliberate attacks on civilians.​

In past lethal incidents at sea highlighted by Human Rights Watch, the Israel Defense Forces have typically said boats “deviated from the designated fishing zone” and that forces fired after warnings were ignored.

According to FAO, rebuilding Gaza’s fishing sector will be impossible without a fundamental change in access and security conditions.

“For Gazans, the sea was not just a source of food, but a source of livelihood and identity,” Bechdol said.

“FAO can assist to help rebuild Gaza’s fishing industry. But for this to happen, peace must first be established and fishers must be allowed to operate their boats and cast their nets without fear of harm.”

Ciro Fiorillo, head of the FAO office for the West Bank and Gaza, said the agency is primed to offer assistance once the security situation improves.

“FAO is ready to restart projects, replenish damaged boats and equipment, and inject emergency funds as soon as these key fishing inputs for production are allowed to enter the Strip, a sustained ceasefire is in place, and access to the sea is restored,” Fiorillo said in a statement.

Since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on southern Israel triggered the Israeli military assault on Gaza, much of the enclave has been flattened, tens of thousands killed, and some 90 percent of the population displaced.

Even since the ceasefire came into effect with the exchange of hostages and prisoners in October last year, pockets of violence have continued and humanitarian needs remain dire. The collapse of fishing has only compounded an already catastrophic food crisis.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has repeatedly warned that the destruction of food-producing systems — including agriculture, fisheries and markets — has pushed Gaza toward famine, with households facing extreme shortages of protein and calories.

With farmland destroyed, livestock killed and imports severely restricted, fish was once among the few foods that could still be sourced locally.

Its near disappearance has driven prices beyond reach for most families and increased dependence on limited humanitarian aid.

“This is about denying Palestinians access to life itself — to survival,” said Baroud.

The destruction of fishing forces Palestinians into deeper dependence on humanitarian aid that Israel itself controls, effectively weaponizing food rather than allowing Palestinians to sustain themselves independently, he said.

Human rights groups documenting maritime enforcement report that fishermen attempting to operate — even close to the shore — face gunfire, pursuit, detention and arrest, contributing to a climate in which fishing has become a life-threatening activity rather than a livelihood.

According to rights monitors, the destruction of larger vessels has eliminated the possibility of reaching deeper waters, forcing the few remaining fishermen to operate in unsafe, shallow zones with damaged equipment, limited fuel and no protection.

Baroud said international law clearly obligates an occupying power to protect civilian livelihoods and ensure access to food and means of survival.

“The systematic targeting of fishermen — who are civilians engaged in subsistence activity — cannot be justified as a military necessity, especially when it results in starvation and famine,” Baroud said.

He said the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits collective punishment, the destruction of civilian infrastructure and the targeting of livelihoods.

The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights has described the restriction of Gaza’s fishing sector as part of a broader assault on civilian survival systems, warning that the denial of access to the sea has direct implications for nutrition, employment and aid dependency.

Baroud said the recovery of Gaza’s fishing sector could not occur in isolation from the broader economy.

“Only a measure of real freedom for Palestinians — freedom of movement, access to land and sea, and the ability to import, export and produce independently — can allow Gaza’s industries and economy to recover,” he said.

Without ending the system of control governing Palestinian life, Baroud said, any discussion of reconstruction or recovery would remain hollow.

As famine warnings intensify, the fishing sector’s collapse stands as a stark example of how Gaza’s food system has fractured.

What was once a daily livelihood is now reduced to occasional, high-risk attempts to secure food.

With no functioning fleet and no safe access to waters, Gaza’s fishermen are operating at the edge of survival.