UN states urged to support call for International Court of Justice opinion on Israeli occupation

The UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of Palestinian People met on Wednesday to discuss a UN request for the International Court of Justice to issue an advisory legal opinion on the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. (Twitter/@UNISPAL)
Short Url
Updated 04 May 2023
Follow

UN states urged to support call for International Court of Justice opinion on Israeli occupation

  • The chair of the UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of Palestinian People said members had a ‘moral duty’ to back the petition
  • Palestinians want the court’s views on the occupation, annexation of Palestinian territories, demolitions of homes, and the denial of their right to self-determination

NEW YORK CITY: The UN Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of Palestinian People met on Wednesday to discuss a UN request for the International Court of Justice to issue an advisory legal opinion on the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. The request was prompted by a letter from the Palestinian government to the General Assembly.

Riyad Mansour, Palestine’s ambassador to the UN, said the Palestinian government wants the court’s opinion on the “prolonged military occupation,” the annexation of Palestinian territories, the demolition of Palestinian homes, and the denial of the right of Palestinians to self-determination, all of which are considered illegal under international law.

The petition to the court also addresses the issue of separate and discriminatory policies, laws and road systems for Jewish Israelis and Palestinian Arabs, he added.

Representatives of Indonesia, Lebanon, Egypt, South Africa and Namibia expressed strong support for Palestinian rights and said their countries will make submissions to the court in support of the Palestinian position.

The committee, which is chaired by Ambassador Cheikh Niang, Senegal’s permanent representative to the UN, also discussed recognition of the Nakba, or “Catastrophe,” the word Palestinians use to refer to their forced expulsion from their land in 1948 when the state of Israel was founded.

A number of speakers reaffirmed the support of their countries for the Palestinian people and their right to a free and independent state. Ahmad Faisal Mohammed, the permanent representative of Malaysia to the UN, was elected vice chair of the committee during the meeting.

“Malaysia has the honor to accept the post of the vice chair of this committee in recognition of Malaysia’s long standing support and contribution to the Palestinian cause,” he said.

Palestinians have long suffered “hardship” and “agony” in the pursuit of their inalienable right to have their own independent state, the achievement of which is long overdue, he added, and affirmed his country’s support for a “two-state” solution that includes the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

Israel occupied the Palestinian West Bank, Gaza and other Arab territories during the 1967 war. In 1994, the Palestine Liberation Organization and Israeli authorities signed the Oslo Agreement, which called for a two-state solution to the conflict between Arabs and Israelis.

Almost 30 years later, Israel has instead become more entrenched in its occupation of the West Bank by building more Jewish settlements, considered illegal under international law, which makes a two-state solution much harder to achieve.

Mansour said during the committee meeting that the recently formed Israeli government, considered the most extreme and right-wing in the history of the state, includes a “convicted terrorist,” a reference to National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who was convicted by an Israeli court in 2008 of supporting terrorism and racism.

Israel continues to mount relentless attacks on the Palestinian civilian population in the occupied territories, Mansour said, as was especially evident during Ramadan, when Israeli forces “desecrated” Muslim and Christian holy sites.

He also highlighted the case of Palestinian prisoner Khader Adnan, who died in an Israeli jail on Tuesday after an 87-day hunger strike in protest against his administrative detention without charge. Palestinians have accused Israeli prison authorities of murder for allowing his condition to deteriorate to such a degree that he died in his cell.

Mansour said the Palestinian mission at the UN has sent an extensive letter to the UN Secretariat detailing Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people, including the death of Adnan.

Niang, the chair of the committee, said it was important “for all of us to make submissions to the” International Court of Justice. It is “our moral duty for us to do that; if we don’t do it, who else will,” he added.

He said that the request to the court is an important legal strategy through which Palestinians might achieve a measure of success in challenging the Israeli occupation.

“This is a very important milestone for the Palestinian cause and we should not miss it. We are counting on all of us to do it,” he said.

The deadline for states to make submissions to the court on the issue is July 25.


Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

  • Gen. Hassan Kabroun tells Arab News claims that army hid weapons in aid convoy are “completely false”

RIYADH: Sudan’s defense minister has firmly denied reports attributed to Sudanese intelligence alleging that a convoy targeted in North Kordofan was secretly transporting weapons under the cover of humanitarian aid.

Gen. Hassan Kabroun described the claims as “false” and an attempt to distract from what he called a militia crime.

The controversy erupted after news reports emerged that a document attributed to Sudan’s General Intelligence Service claimed the convoy struck in Al-Rahad on Friday was not a purely humanitarian mission, but was instead carrying “high-quality weapons and ammunition” destined for Sudanese Armed Forces units operating in the state.

The report further alleged that the convoy had been outwardly classified as humanitarian in order to secure safe passage through conflict zones, and that the Rapid Support Forces had destroyed it after gathering intelligence on its route and cargo.

Kabroun categorically rejected the narrative.

“First of all, we would like to stress the fact that this news is false,” he told Arab News. “Even the headline that talks about the security of the regions, such as Al-Dabbah, is not a headline the army would use.”

He described the document as fabricated and politically motivated, saying it was designed to “cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

The minister affirmed that the area targeted by drones is under full control of the Sudanese Armed Forces and does not require any covert military transport.

“Second, we confirm that the region that was targeted by drones is controlled by the army and very safe,” Kabroun said. “It does not require transporting any military equipment using aid convoys as decoys because it is a safe area controlled by the army, which has significant capabilities to transport humanitarian aid.”

According to the minister, the Sudanese military has both the logistical capacity and secure routes necessary to move equipment openly when needed.

“The army is professional and does not need to deliver anything to Kadugli or Dalang on board aid convoys,” he said. “The road between Dalang and Kadugli is open. The Sudanese forces used that road to enter and take control of the region. The road is open and whenever military trucks need to deliver anything, they can do so without resorting to any form of camouflage.”

Kabroun further rejected any suggestion that the military uses humanitarian operations as cover.

“Aid is transported by dedicated relief vehicles to the areas in need of this assistance,” he said. “Aid is not transported by the army. The army and security apparatus do not interfere with relief efforts at all, and do not even accompany the convoys.”

He stressed that the Sudanese Armed Forces maintains a clear institutional separation between military operations and humanitarian work, particularly amid the country’s crisis.

“These are false claims,” he said. “This fake news wanted to cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

Sudan has been gripped by conflict since April 2023, when fighting broke out between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, plunging the country into what the United Nations has described as one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters.

The latest dispute over the convoy comes amid intensified fighting in South Kordofan, a strategically sensitive region linking central Sudan with the contested areas of Darfur and Blue Nile.

The false report suggested that intelligence monitoring had enabled the RSF to strike what it described as a military convoy disguised as humanitarian aid. But Kabroun dismissed that version outright.

“The intelligence agency is well aware of its duties,” he said. “The Sudanese Army has enough weapons and equipment to use in the areas of operations. These claims are completely false.”

He argued that the narrative being circulated seeks to shift blame for attacks on civilian infrastructure and humanitarian movements.

“This shows that they are trying to cover up the atrocities,” he added, referring to the militia.

Kabroun maintained that the army has regained momentum on multiple fronts and remains fully capable of sustaining its operations without resorting to deception.

“The region is secure, the roads are open, and the army does not need camouflage,” he said. “We are operating professionally and transparently.”

“These claims are completely false,” Kabroun said. “The Sudanese Army does not use humanitarian convoys for military purposes.”