Pakistan's National Assembly passes bill to clip chief justice's powers

People walks past the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 4, 2022. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 29 March 2023
Follow

Pakistan's National Assembly passes bill to clip chief justice's powers

  • Bill proposes a three-member committee of senior-most judges take up all suo motu matters
  • ECP says ready to hold polls in Punjab, KP if required funds, security personnel are provided

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's National Assembly passed a bill on Wednesday to clip the powers of the country's top judge, preventing him from taking suo motu notices in an individual capacity on issues of fundamental rights and constitute benches for various cases. 

Seeking amendments to the existing law, the bill was tabled by Pakistan's Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar on Tuesday after two Supreme Court judges, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, wrote in a dissenting note that the office of the chief justice enjoyed "unbridled powers." The judges also said the chief justice's "one-man show" in the judiciary needed to be revisited.  

 

The development also takes place at a time when all eyes are on the Supreme Court of Pakistan, as it hears a petition filed by former prime minister Imran Khan's political party challenging the Election Commission of Pakistan's (ECP) decision to delay polls in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Punjab provinces to October 8. 

The bill, titled 'The Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill, 2023', would become law once it is also passed by the Senate—the upper house of Pakistan's bicameral parliament—and receives the president's formal approval. 

A copy of the bill seen by Arab News says that a three-member committee, comprising the chief justice and two of the most senior judges of the apex court, would constitute a bench that would have the power to hear and dispose off a cause, matter or appeal. The decisions of the committee would be made by majority, it added. 

Regarding the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction, the bill says any matter invoking the use of Article 184 (3) [referring to suo motu notices] would first be placed before the committee. In suo-motu cases, the court would itself take cognizance of the matter and initiate proceedings instead of the parties presenting a case or controversy to its attention.

“If the committee is of the view that a question of public importance with reference to enforcement of any of the fundamental rights... is involved, it shall constitute a bench comprising not less than three judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan which may also include the members of the committee, for adjudication of the matter,” the bill reads.

The bill grants the right to appeal in suo motu cases, with the appeals to be fixed before the court within a period not exceeding 14 days.

Speaking on the floor of the house, Tarar said it was the assembly's right to legislate on issues of public importance, adding that all six bar councils across Pakistan have lauded the bill.

“There is no need for a constitutional amendment [to regulate powers of the office of chief justice],” he pointed out, adding that the Supreme Court has been making its rules as per the constitution and law since 1980.

Meanwhile, the apex court adjourned a hearing on the petition filed by Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party on the delay in polls in KP and Punjab, till tomorrow, Thursday.

ECP's lawyer Sajeel Swati assured the court during the hearing that the ECP was prepared to hold elections if it is provided with the required funds and security personnel to do so. 

Swati informed the court that Pakistan's intelligence agencies provided the commission secret reports of the presence of militant outfits in parts of KP and Punjab, adding that the ECP faces a shortage of 297,000 security personnel to conduct polls peacefully.

He said the finance ministry had also declined to release the required funds during the current financial year that were required to hold the polls.

In response, Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial remarked that Pakistan had been facing "terrorism" for the past 20 years yet elections were still held in the country. 

The chief justice directed the ECP lawyer to appear again on Thursday with "full preparation" and ordered Pakistan's attorney-general to consult the interior and defense ministers on the minimum time the government required for elections.

Khan, who was ousted in a vote of confidence in April last year, has rejected the election commission's decision to delay the polls. The cricketer-turned-politician says the move is a larger plot to delay polls as the incumbent government is afraid of his rising popularity, which he says has helped him win a string of by-elections in the past couple of months.


US freezes visa processing for 75 countries, media reports Pakistan included

Updated 14 January 2026
Follow

US freezes visa processing for 75 countries, media reports Pakistan included

  • State Department announces indefinite pause on immigrant visas starting Jan 21
  • Move underscores Trump’s hard-line immigration push despite close Pakistan-US ties

ISLAMABAD: The United States will pause immigrant visa processing for applicants from 75 countries starting Jan. 21, the State Department said on Wednesday, with Fox News and other media outlets reporting that Pakistan is among the countries affected by the indefinite suspension.

The move comes as the Trump administration presses ahead with a broad immigration crackdown, with Pakistan included among the affected countries despite strong ongoing diplomatic engagement between Islamabad and Washington on economic cooperation, regional diplomacy and security matters.

Fox News, citing an internal State Department memo, said US embassies had been instructed to refuse immigrant visas under existing law while Washington reassesses screening and vetting procedures. The report said the pause would apply indefinitely and covers countries across Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Latin America.

“The State Department will pause immigrant visa processing from 75 countries whose migrants take welfare from the American people at unacceptable rates. The freeze will remain active until the US can ensure that new immigrants will not extract wealth from the American people,” the Department of State said in a post on X.

According to Fox News and Pakistan news outlets like Dawn, the list of affected countries includes Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Nigeria, Russia, Somalia, Brazil and Thailand, among others. 

“The suspension could delay travel, study, and work plans for thousands of Pakistanis who annually seek US visas. Pakistani consulates in the US are expected to provide guidance to affected applicants in the coming days,” Dawn reported.

A State Department spokesman declined comment when Arab News reached out via email to confirm if Pakistan was on the list. 

The Department has not publicly released the full list of countries or clarified which visa categories would be affected, nor has it provided a timeline for when processing could resume.

Trump has made immigration enforcement a central pillar of his agenda since returning to office last year, reviving and expanding the use of the “public charge” provision of US immigration law to restrict entry by migrants deemed likely to rely on public benefits.

During his previous term as president, Trump imposed sweeping travel restrictions on several Muslim-majority countries, a policy widely referred to as a “Muslim ban,” which was challenged in US courts before a revised version was upheld by the Supreme Court. That policy was later rescinded under the President Joe Biden administration.

The latest visa freeze marks a renewed hardening of US immigration policy, raising uncertainty for migrants from affected countries as Washington reassesses its screening and vetting procedures. 

The freeze on visas comes amid an intensifying crackdown on immigration enforcement by the Trump administration. In Minneapolis last week, a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Good, a US citizen, during a federal operation, an incident that has drawn nationwide protests and scrutiny of ICE tactics. Family members and local officials have challenged the federal account of the shooting, even as Department of Homeland Security officials defended the agent’s actions. The case has prompted resignations by federal prosecutors and heightened debate over the conduct of immigration enforcement under the current administration.