Indian students defy ban on Modi documentary despite arrests

People watch the BBC documentary "India: The Modi Question", on a screen installed at the Marine Drive junction under the direction of the district Congress committee, in Kochi on January 24, 2023. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 28 January 2023
Follow

Indian students defy ban on Modi documentary despite arrests

  • Documentary investigates Narendra Modi’s role in the deadly Gujarat riots in 2002
  • Government sees the British broadcaster’s program as ‘manipulation by foreign power’

NEW DELHI: Indian students are defying a ban on a BBC program examining Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s past, despite arrests and attempts by authorities to prevent them from organizing screenings.

The two-part program, “India: The Modi Question,” examines claims about Modi’s role in the 2002 riots in Gujarat that left more than 1,000 dead, most of them Muslims.

Modi was serving as chief minister of the western state when the violence broke out.

The government banned the documentary over the weekend using emergency powers under information technology laws, but students continued to organize screenings across the country.

At least 13 students of Jamia Millia Islamia in New Delhi were detained for 24 hours on Wednesday, after they tried to show the documentary at their campus. 

“We were handed over to the police by the proctor of Jamia Islamia University. On Friday, the Jamia authorities shut down all the facilities for students,” one of the arrested, Azeez Shareef from the Students Federation of India, told Arab News.

“We grew up with a certain idea of India, with secular values and democratic principles, but this government has attacked everything.”

Earlier this week, authorities cut off electricity at Jawaharlal Nehru University when students gathered to screen the documentary.

“We wanted to screen the documentary so that youth can form their own opinion,” said Aishe Ghosh, president of Jawaharlal Nehru Students Union.

“The new generation does not remember what happened in Gujarat in 2002 because they were too young. But when we see today’s reality, it’s important for the young generation to make the link that the same political party that is in power in Delhi was responsible in some form or another in manufacturing a pogrom in the state of Gujarat.”

She added that universities are where students should have “space to debate and discuss and differ.”

As the government ban means the film cannot be streamed or shared on social media — and Twitter and YouTube have complied with a government request to take down links to the documentary — students argue there is no explicit ban on screenings.

“Where is the order to ban the documentary?” said Abhisek Nandan, president of the Student Union of the University of Hyderabad, which has organized a screening and discussion on the first episode of the program.

“The documentary carries the truth about Gujarati riots that journalists and civil society groups have been telling for the last 20 years.”

Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party sees the British broadcaster’s film as manipulation and an assault on India’s judicial system.

“A foreign power undermining the judicial system of India is not the right thing to do. The entire episode of the Gujarat riot has minutely been scrutinized by all, including the judiciary,” BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Mittal told Arab News.

In 2013, a court in Gujarat found Modi not directly responsible for the riots. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling in 2022.

“The documentary is an assault on the judicial system of this country. That’s why it is not permitted,” Mittal said.

“The country is right in not allowing manipulation by a foreign power.”

The film could undermine Modi’s reputation at a time when India is chairing the Group of 20 largest economies and will host the G20 summit this year.

“It’s obvious that PM Modi realized that the documentary had the potential to hurt his reputation at a time when he could least afford it,” political analyst Sanjay Kapoor told Arab News.  

“For him, the G20 platform provided him an opportunity to showcase himself as a world leader, and he didn’t want his image to be sullied as someone who was complicit in the Gujarat genocide.”


AI fuels cyber threats but also offers new defenses, panel tells WEF

Updated 21 January 2026
Follow

AI fuels cyber threats but also offers new defenses, panel tells WEF

  • Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400% rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans
  • Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions

DUBAI: Artificial intelligence is making cyberattacks more sophisticated and widespread, but it is also enhancing digital defenses, experts told the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, as they stressed the need for zero-trust systems and robust AI frameworks to reduce vulnerabilities.

Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400 percent rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans.

Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions.

Michelle Zatlyn, co-founder, president and COO of Cloudflare, pointed to modern solutions organizations can invest in. However, she warned against the digital divide between major financial institutions that have robust cybersecurity measures, and smaller organizations struggling with outdated security solutions.

This divide, she said, necessitates heightened awareness and adaptation to modern security technologies to prevent crises, especially during vulnerable times like weekends.

The panelists stressed international collaboration and intelligence sharing between government agencies, law enforcement and the private sector as the way to tackle cross-border threats and build more resilient societies.

Catherine de Bolle, executive director at Europol, said AI has transformed the policing scene where traditional methods no longer function. She emphasized Europol’s extensive efforts to boost collaboration with the private sector to develop tools to protect the digital ecosystem, enhance crypto tracing and boost financial security.

De Bolle said AI had enhanced the capabilities and outreach of organized crime groups “because it facilitates the business model where you only need a computer and some people who are technically schooled.”

“We predict that in the future, digital crime frauds will be much easier as you gain a lot of money and reach more people without the need of an infrastructure,” she added. Collaboration with the private sector, she said, helps ensure a secure ecosystem that maintains user trust in online platforms.

However, Michael Miebach, CEO of Mastercard, said while AI can help defend against cyberattacks, trust needs to be built first among people to make these technologies fulfill its promises in driving prosperity and growth.

“If we don’t build a trusted layer around these technologies, people will not use it,” he said, pointing out that cyber threats have impacted the geopolitical, societal and corporate aspects of life.

Hatem Dowidar, group CEO of e&, called for more intelligent networks to deploy AI agents that detect and isolate malicious behavior early on to protect digital ecosystems from highly disruptive cyberattacks.

“So you are in some sense more cognizant of malicious hardware being embedded in your system,” he said. However, he warned against the loophole created as more companies implement agentic AI agents that could expose networks. Therefore, he urged the building of zero-trust systems to prevent incursions of new threats coming through these technologies.

He also stressed the need to establish guardrails to monitor AI agents because they are “programmed in plain language and it’s very easy that the programming goes out of context.”

“We never could have relied 100 percent on a human agent to work if there is no supervision and that will hold true for AI,” said Dowidar.

Another challenge the panelists highlighted was the blurred lines between state and non-state actors, with states potentially using organized crime to execute cyber operations.

Europol’s de Bolle said this brings new challenges for traditional policing and necessitates joint efforts across intelligence, defense, and law enforcement sectors.

“State actors are using criminal groups for their own purposes to launch DDoS attacks,” she said, adding that the danger comes from the fact that “states can hide behind and criminals can hide after the state and they don’t have to make the investment because the structure is already there.”

She said such developments make it necessary to think of the future of defense police intelligence services where law enforcement works closely with the private sector to tackle such dangers, while respecting the boundaries of different agencies: “If we do not put the information and intelligence together to tackle this, we will never win the battle.”

Dowidar said information sharing needed to happen on national and international security levels. Nationally, there should be an entity that coordinates between the police, intelligence, network operators and the critical infrastructure companies.

Internationally, there should be security centers that immediately inform other like-minded organizations around the world of any new threat, along with sharing how the problem was solved or whether help is needed from other experts.

Meanwhile, de Bolle said it was the responsibility of the private and public sectors to build societal resilience, boost digital literacy, revamp the education system and develop the critical mindset of the young generation who will use these tools in the future.

Cloudflare’s Zatlyn urged business leaders to understand the basics of new technologies, beyond only relying on technical teams, to keep revenue flowing and minimize risks facing their networks.

She also stressed that CEOs and organizations must consider AI agents as an “extension” of their teams.

“Organizations are concerned that their data will leak with the use of new technologies, but this depends how to train the agents. These are all stoppable issues,” said Zatlyn.