EU states condemn Syrian regime for using chemical weapons against civilians

Manso said the US has destroyed 98 percent of its own stockpiles of chemical weapons and is on track to destroy the remainder in the next year. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 02 December 2022
Follow

EU states condemn Syrian regime for using chemical weapons against civilians

  • Speaking on behalf of fellow EU members, France demanded the Assad regime comply with international treaties and destroy its stockpiles of the weapons
  • Joseph Manso, the US envoy to the OPCW, said his country has destroyed 98 percent of its chemical weapons and is on track to destroy the rest next year

WASHINGTON: EU member states condemned the Syrian government for using chemical weapons against its own citizens during the 11-year civil war in the country, and demanded that the regime of President Bashar Assad complies with international conventions on such weapons of mass destruction.

France delivered a statement on behalf of its fellow EU members during the four-day 27th Session of the Conference of the States Parties of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which concluded at the World Forum the Hague in the Netherlands on Friday.

The CSP oversees the implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, promotes its objectives and reviews compliance with the treaty.

The EU statement called on the Syrian regime to destroy its chemical weapon stockpiles. It also reaffirmed the bloc’s commitment to preventing the use of such weapons anywhere in the world, citing several examples in recent decades.

“We condemn the use of all chemical weapons by state and non-state actors during the last 25 years, including in Iraq, Malaysia, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and, on multiple occasions, in the Syrian Arab Republic,” it said.

The OPCW, of which 193 states are members, oversees the global objective to permanently rid the world of chemical weapons. According to the CSP, tens of thousands of these weapons, amounting to about 99 percent of declared global stockpiles, have already been verifiably destroyed.

OPCW investigations have concluded that the Syrian regime used deadly chemical weapons against its own citizens on several occasions during the civil war, killing and injuring thousands of innocent civilians.

Syrian representatives responded to the statement by France by describing it as “false accusations” and said the EU was using the OPCW as a “tool for political manipulation”.

“It is natural for France to lead this campaign along with some Western countries, particularly those that launched repeated aggressions on Syrian territory in 2017 and 2018 under the pretext of the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons, even before those incidents were investigated,” the Syrian delegation said.

Ambassador Joseph Manso, the US permanent representative to OPCW noted during a press briefing attended by Arab News that Syria, which is a member of the organization, was stripped of its voting rights and other privileges in 2021.

He said that efforts continue to get the Syrian government to comply with its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and to hold accountable those responsible for the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Manso said the US has destroyed 98 percent of its own stockpiles of chemical weapons and is on track to destroy the remainder in the next year.

Applauding the global consensus on the elimination of chemical weapons, he said: “The good news here is that this has been a highly effective treaty that has gone a long way toward eliminating an entire category of weapons of mass destruction, and the vast majority of the world’s states support this.”

Manso criticized Russia for its continuing support for the Assad regime in Syria.

He also said the US government is working with the OPCW to provide the Ukrainian government with training and equipment to help it detect chemical weapon attacks and protect civilians.

“What we’re working to do is to ensure that the Ukrainians have the necessary defensive equipment to promptly detect such an attack, to protect themselves and civilian populations (and) to have trained first responders to respond in the case of such an attack,” he said.

“We want to make sure that Ukraine is prepared in the eventuality that the Russians were to use chemical weapons.”


Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Sudan defense minister dismisses ‘intelligence document’ as fabrication after convoy strike

  • Gen. Hassan Kabroun tells Arab News claims that army hid weapons in aid convoy are “completely false”

RIYADH: Sudan’s defense minister has firmly denied reports attributed to Sudanese intelligence alleging that a convoy targeted in North Kordofan was secretly transporting weapons under the cover of humanitarian aid.

Gen. Hassan Kabroun described the claims as “false” and an attempt to distract from what he called a militia crime.

The controversy erupted after news reports emerged that a document attributed to Sudan’s General Intelligence Service claimed the convoy struck in Al-Rahad on Friday was not a purely humanitarian mission, but was instead carrying “high-quality weapons and ammunition” destined for Sudanese Armed Forces units operating in the state.

The report further alleged that the convoy had been outwardly classified as humanitarian in order to secure safe passage through conflict zones, and that the Rapid Support Forces had destroyed it after gathering intelligence on its route and cargo.

Kabroun categorically rejected the narrative.

“First of all, we would like to stress the fact that this news is false,” he told Arab News. “Even the headline that talks about the security of the regions, such as Al-Dabbah, is not a headline the army would use.”

He described the document as fabricated and politically motivated, saying it was designed to “cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

The minister affirmed that the area targeted by drones is under full control of the Sudanese Armed Forces and does not require any covert military transport.

“Second, we confirm that the region that was targeted by drones is controlled by the army and very safe,” Kabroun said. “It does not require transporting any military equipment using aid convoys as decoys because it is a safe area controlled by the army, which has significant capabilities to transport humanitarian aid.”

According to the minister, the Sudanese military has both the logistical capacity and secure routes necessary to move equipment openly when needed.

“The army is professional and does not need to deliver anything to Kadugli or Dalang on board aid convoys,” he said. “The road between Dalang and Kadugli is open. The Sudanese forces used that road to enter and take control of the region. The road is open and whenever military trucks need to deliver anything, they can do so without resorting to any form of camouflage.”

Kabroun further rejected any suggestion that the military uses humanitarian operations as cover.

“Aid is transported by dedicated relief vehicles to the areas in need of this assistance,” he said. “Aid is not transported by the army. The army and security apparatus do not interfere with relief efforts at all, and do not even accompany the convoys.”

He stressed that the Sudanese Armed Forces maintains a clear institutional separation between military operations and humanitarian work, particularly amid the country’s crisis.

“These are false claims,” he said. “This fake news wanted to cover up the heinous crime they committed.”

Sudan has been gripped by conflict since April 2023, when fighting broke out between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, plunging the country into what the United Nations has described as one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters.

The latest dispute over the convoy comes amid intensified fighting in South Kordofan, a strategically sensitive region linking central Sudan with the contested areas of Darfur and Blue Nile.

The false report suggested that intelligence monitoring had enabled the RSF to strike what it described as a military convoy disguised as humanitarian aid. But Kabroun dismissed that version outright.

“The intelligence agency is well aware of its duties,” he said. “The Sudanese Army has enough weapons and equipment to use in the areas of operations. These claims are completely false.”

He argued that the narrative being circulated seeks to shift blame for attacks on civilian infrastructure and humanitarian movements.

“This shows that they are trying to cover up the atrocities,” he added, referring to the militia.

Kabroun maintained that the army has regained momentum on multiple fronts and remains fully capable of sustaining its operations without resorting to deception.

“The region is secure, the roads are open, and the army does not need camouflage,” he said. “We are operating professionally and transparently.”

“These claims are completely false,” Kabroun said. “The Sudanese Army does not use humanitarian convoys for military purposes.”