Microsoft restricts access to its AI facial recognition technology 

Microsoft is limiting the use of its custom neural voice technology, used to create AI voices based on recordings of real people, known as deepfakes. (Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 23 June 2022
Follow

Microsoft restricts access to its AI facial recognition technology 

  • Company announces overhaul of its artificial intelligence ethics policy, restricts the use of its facial recognition tools

 LONDON: Microsoft revealed on Tuesday that companies using its facial recognition technology are no longer permitted to do so for things such as identifying emotions, gender or age. 

As part of its new “responsible AI standard,” Microsoft’s overhaul of its artificial intelligence ethics policy is intended to keep “people and their goals at the center of system design decisions.”

“We collaborated with internal and external researchers to understand the limitations and potential benefits of this technology and navigate the tradeoffs,” said Sarah Bird, a product manager at Microsoft.

“In the case of emotion classification specifically, these efforts raised important questions about privacy, the lack of consensus on a definition of ‘emotions,’ and the inability to generalize the linkage between facial expression and emotional state across use cases.”

What this means is that Microsoft will limit access to some features of its facial recognition services — known as Azure Face — and remove others entirely. 

Users or companies wishing to use this service will have to apply to use Azure Face for facial identification and tell Microsoft exactly how and where they will be deploying its systems. 

They will also need to prove that they are matching Microsoft’s AI ethics standards and that the features benefit the end-user and society.

Microsoft says that even companies that are granted access will no longer be able to use some of the more controversial features of Azure Face, including tools aimed at detecting gender, age, smile, hair, as well as other emotional states and attributes.  

Additionally, Microsoft is limiting the use of its custom neural voice technology, used to create AI voices based on recordings of real people, known as deepfakes. 

While the company is retiring those features, Microsoft will still use some of the tools in certain products such as “Seeing AI” app, which uses machine vision to verbally describe the world for users with vision problems.


Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

Updated 12 March 2026
Follow

Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

  • Information Minister Paul Morcos instructs outlets to comply with government decision
  • Journalists, social media urged to avoid content that could provoke hate speech, incitement

BEIRUT: Lebanon has begun implementing a Cabinet decision taken earlier this month to ban Hezbollah’s security and military activities by scaling back coverage of the group on official media platforms.

The measure, which was described in political circles as a significant and bold step, came after decades during which news about the party and the speeches of its leaders were published verbatim and broadcast live through official media outlets, like the state-run National News Agency, TV station Tele Liban and Radio Lebanon.

“No one is imposing censorship,” an official source told Arab News.

“Rather, there is a commitment to the decisions of the state. It is no longer possible for a speech that attacks the Lebanese government and the state to be published through its official media outlets.”

Information Minister Paul Morcos issued a circular instructing directors of official media outlets to comply with the government’s decision to ban the broadcast of speeches or statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem and statements issued by the group’s armed wing, particularly when they contain criticism of the state.

Morcos also ordered that Hezbollah statements be handled in the same manner as those issued by other political parties, meaning they should not be published verbatim. He further instructed media outlets to avoid using the term “Islamic resistance,” except when it appears directly within Hezbollah statements.

The first manifestations of the decision were Tele Liban’s abstention from live broadcasting a speech by Qassem and a statement made on Tuesday by lawmaker Mohammed Raad, who heads the Hezbollah parliamentary bloc.

The group’s supporters described the move as an attempt “to restrict the resistance, Hezbollah and its leadership in the official media.”

Some argued on social media that preventing the use of terms like “resistance” or “holy warriors (Mujahedin)” and replacing them with expressions such as “Hezbollah” and “fighters” was “aimed at brainwashing and stripping the party of its resistance identity.”

During a Cabinet session on Thursday, Morcos raised the issue of content circulating on social media that incites murder and sectarian strife. This comes against the backdrop of the war that Hezbollah waged from Lebanon against Israel on March 2, without state approval, which led to a sharp division in Lebanese public opinion.

Morcos, who is also Cabinet spokesperson, said after the session that what was being published “exceeds the bounds of freedom of opinion, the press and expression.”

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam considered it to fall under the penal code, specifically regarding crimes that harm national unity, he said, and that “we are against strife in all its forms.”

Morcos also urged journalists, influencers and social media users to remain aware of the sensitivity of the current situation and to avoid content that could provoke strife, hate speech or incitement.

He acknowledged, however, that, according to a legal study, he has no authority over social media, even on media-related matters.

“The Ministry of Information does not exercise a guardianship role and lacks judicial police powers,” he said.

“These authorities rest with the public prosecution offices, which are overseen by the minister of justice and fall within the domain of criminal law and criminal prosecution.”

The ban was agreed during a Cabinet session on March 2, after Hezbollah launched six rockets from Lebanese territory toward northern Israel, the first such attack since the November 2024 ceasefire, prompting retaliatory strikes.

The Cabinet reaffirmed that “the decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state and its constitutional institutions,” and called on Hezbollah to hand over its weapons to the state while limiting its role to political activity within the legal and constitutional framework.