Italy seeks humanitarian corridors for Afghan refugees

In this handout image courtesy of the US Navy, Afghan evacuees disembark a US Air Force C-17 Globemaster III at Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily, Italy on August 22, 2021. (FIle/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 October 2021
Follow

Italy seeks humanitarian corridors for Afghan refugees

  • Lamorgese reaffirmed the need for a “strong European line” to avoid Afghan refugees getting into the hands of human traffickers
  • Late on Thursday, the cabinet decided to increase the government’s refugee reception scheme by 3,000 places

ROME: Italy has pledged to establish humanitarian corridors for Afghan refugees.

Interior Minister Luciana Lamorgese told an EU forum on the protection of Afghan citizens who had fled their country that Rome will promote action that ensures refugees can reach Italy from third countries.

Lamorgese told the event attended by Arab News that the scheme would cover Afghan refugees “in clear need of international protection,” taking them from Pakistan and Iran. She added that the plan could also include resettling a quota of Afghans in Turkey under the direction of the European resettlement program for 2022.

She confirmed that Italy is already working on setting up the corridors, which will work like those already established for Syrian refugees.

Lamorgese also reaffirmed the need for a “strong European line” to avoid Afghan refugees getting into the hands of human traffickers.

“We must develop collaboration with third countries of transit to dismantle the trafficking networks, strengthening the reception capacity of the countries bordering Afghanistan,” said Lamorgese, adding: “At the same time, legal channels of entry for vulnerable people must be provided.”

Italy managed to evacuate over 4,900 Afghan citizens from Kabul during emergency airlifts as the Taliban recaptured the country in August. They all have been relocated in cities and towns all over the country, where they have received assistance and jobs so that they may build a new life with their families.

Late on Thursday, the cabinet decided to increase the government’s refugee reception scheme by 3,000 places.

This decision, a spokesman for the Italian prime minister told Arab News, has been taken so that the scheme “could meet in an adequate way the new and particular requirements related to the emergency in Afghanistan and the reception of refugees from that country.”


Trump targets non-white immigrants in renewed xenophobic rants

Updated 43 min 38 sec ago
Follow

Trump targets non-white immigrants in renewed xenophobic rants

  • During a rally in Pennsylvania on Wednesday,  Trump doubled down on his tirade against Somali migrants
  • "Why is it we only take people from shithole countries,’ right? Trump told his cheering audience

WASHINGTON: Back in 2018, President Donald Trump disputed having used the epithet “shithole” to describe some countries whose citizens emigrated to the United States.
Nowadays, he embraces it and pushes his anti-immigrant and xenophobic tirades even further.
Case in point: during a rally in the northeastern state of Pennsylvania on Wednesday that was supposed to focus on his economic policy, the 79-year-old Republican openly ranted and reused the phrase that had sparked an outcry during his first term.
“We had a meeting and I said, ‘Why is it we only take people from shithole countries,’ right? ‘Why can’t we have some people from Norway, Sweden?’” Trump told his cheering audience.
“But we always take people from Somalia,” he continued. “Places that are a disaster. Filthy, dirty, disgusting, ridden with crime.”
Recently, he called Somali immigrants “trash.”
These comments are “more proof of his racist, anti-immigrant agenda,” Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey responded on X.

The Trump megaphone

Florida Republican lawmaker Randy Fine, on the other hand, defended Trump.
“Not all cultures are equal and not all countries are equal,” he said on CNN, adding “the president speaks in language that Americans understand, he is blunt.”
University of Albany history professor Carl Bon Tempo told AFP this type of anti-immigrant rhetoric has long thrived on the far-right.
“The difference is now it’s coming directly out of the White House,” he said, adding “there’s no bigger megaphone” in American politics.
On the campaign trail in 2023, Trump told a rally in New Hampshire that immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” — a remark that drew comparisons to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.
Now back in power, Trump’s administration has launched a sweeping and brutal deportation campaign and suspended immigration applications from nationals of 19 of the poorest countries on the planet.
Simultaneously, the president ordered white South African farmers to be admitted to the US, claiming their persecution.

No filter left

“Any filter he might have had is gone,” Terri Givens, a professor at the University of British Columbia in Canada and immigration policy expert, told AFP.
For Trump, it doesn’t matter whether an immigrant obeys the law, or owns a business, or has been here for decades, according to Syracuse University political science professor Mark Brockway.
“They are caught in the middle of Trump’s fight against an invented evil enemy,” Brockway told AFP.
By describing some immigrants as “killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies” — as Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem did earlier this month — the White House is designating a target other than itself for American economic ire at a time when the cost of living has gone up and fears are growing over job security and loss of federal benefits.
But, Bon Tempo noted, “when immigration spikes as an issue, it spikes because of economics sometimes, but it also spikes because of these larger sort of foundational questions about what it means to be an American.”
On November 28, after an Afghan national attacked two National Guard soldiers in Washington, Trump took to his Truth Social network to call for “REVERSE MIGRATION.”
This notion, developed by European far-right theorists such as French writer Renaud Camus, refers to the mass expulsion of foreigners deemed incapable of assimilation.
Digging into the “Make America Great Again” belief system, many experts have noted echoes of the “nativist” current of politics from the 1920s in the US, which held that white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant culture was the true American identity.
That stance led to immigration policies favoring Northern and Western Europe.
As White House senior adviser Stephen Miller recently wrote on X: “This is the great lie of mass migration. You are not just importing individuals. You are importing societies...At scale, migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions, and terrors, of their broken homelands.”