UK urged to bring home family stranded with COVID-19 in Syrian camp

Refugees in al-Hol camp, Syria, 13 March, 2017. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 May 2021
Follow

UK urged to bring home family stranded with COVID-19 in Syrian camp

  • Family, including toddler, face ‘real risk of life-threatening illness and possibly death’
  • They are among dozens stranded in former Daesh territory

LONDON: The UK government is being asked to repatriate a family stuck in a detention camp on the Syria-Iraq border who have contracted COVID-19.

UK charity Reprieve said the family, including a toddler with breathing difficulties and another member with asthma, were experiencing serious symptoms and had no access to proper healthcare in the camp.

The family, who the charity says were trafficked into territory formerly held by Daesh, faces a “real risk of life-threatening illness, and possibly death.”

Maya Foa, executive director of Reprieve, told The Guardian: “This is a family which is very likely to include victims of trafficking and they have been in this camp for a few years now. They all have roots in the UK. They are British and I have spent time with them in the camp.”

She added: “As well as the imperative to bring them back to receive treatment, surely the British government should also now be looking to investigate trafficking, and they would be happy to speak to the authorities.”

The plea comes as a group of UK politicians try to pressure the government to help British citizens return home from the region.

Around 800 have traveled to Daesh territory since the group emerged. Reprieve says 25 adults, mainly women, and 35 children are still there.

Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative peer, said: “I would absolutely make the case on compassionate grounds for why British nationals should not be left in the middle of a pandemic stateless in the middle of a desert.”

She added: “We cannot hold ourselves up as a bastion for our policy against trafficking, modern-day slavery and sexual violence in conflict … and then simply close our eyes when it comes to our own citizens being subjected to the very actions that we are campaigning against.”

Conservative MP Andrew Mitchell said: “There is a danger that if these people are left stranded in an ungoverned space, they could be prey to terrorists and weaponized against us, which is why it’s so important to agree with the arguments which the Americans have made about bringing them back to their country of origin.”

A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “Our priority is to ensure the safety and security of the UK. Those who remain in Syria include dangerous individuals who chose to stay to fight or otherwise support a group that committed atrocious crimes including butchering and beheading innocent civilians.

“Where we become aware of British unaccompanied or orphaned children, or if British children are able to seek consular assistance, we will work to facilitate their return, subject to national security concerns.”


Ireland’s defense gaps exposed as EU presidency nears

Cathal Berry, former Irish army special forces member, on The Curragh plain. (AFP)
Updated 58 min 36 sec ago
Follow

Ireland’s defense gaps exposed as EU presidency nears

  • Militarily neutral Ireland is not a NATO member, yet its waters — seven times its landmass — account for around 16 percent of the EU’s total

THE CURRAGH: Sheep amble around steel fences skirting Ireland’s largest military base on a grassy plain west of Dublin, a bucolic scene masking an underfunded defense force struggling with outdated equipment.

Ireland’s threadbare military and its long-standing policy of neutrality are under heightened scrutiny as the country prepares to assume the rotating EU presidency from July.

“Ireland is the only EU country with no primary radar system, nor have we sonar or anti-drone detection equipment — let alone the ability to disable drones,” said former Irish special forces member Cathal Berry.

“We can’t even monitor the airspace over our capital city and main airport,” he said as he surveyed Ireland’s main military base at The Curragh.

Militarily neutral Ireland is not a NATO member, yet its waters — seven times its landmass — account for around 16 percent of the EU’s total.

Nearly three-quarters of transatlantic subsea cables run close to or beneath them.

But the Irish army numbers only a few thousand troops, is focused largely on UN peacekeeping missions and has neither a combat air force nor a sizeable navy.

Ireland’s annual defense spending of roughly €1.2 billion is the lowest in Europe at around 0.2 percent of the GDP, well below the EU average of 1.3.

“Neutrality itself is actually a fine policy. If you want to have it, it must be defended,” said retired Irish army colonel Dorcha Lee.

“That’s the whole point. Undefended neutrality is absolutely definitely not the way to go.”

Berry points to a long-standing “complacency” about defense in Ireland that has fueled a vacuum in debate over neutrality and military spending.

“If you wanted to squeeze the EU without any risk of NATO retaliation, Ireland is where you’d come,” he said, adding that also applied to US interests in Europe.

US tech giants like Google, Apple and Meta have their European headquarters in Ireland, supported by vast data centers that analysts say are vulnerable to cyberattacks.

European Council President Antonio Costa said he was still “confident” Ireland could protect EU summits during its presidency.

Defense Minister Helen McEntee has pledged that new counter-drone technology will be in place by then.

Speaking in front of a row of aging army vehicles at the Curragh military site, she also announced a broader increase in military spending, although the actual details remain unclear.

On Dec. 17, the Irish government said it plans to buy a military radar system from France at a reported cost of between €300 and €500 million (around $350-$585 million).

For Paul Murphy, a left-wing opposition member of parliament, “scaremongering over allegedly Russian drones with concrete evidence still unprovided” is

giving the government cover to steer Ireland away from neutrality toward NATO.

“But it’s more important than ever that we’re genuinely neutral in a world that is increasingly dangerous,” he told AFP.

Ireland has historically prioritized economic and social spending over defense investment, he said.

“Joining an arms race that Ireland cannot compete in would waste money that should be spent on real priorities like climate change,” he added.

Pro-neutrality sentiment still holds sway among the Irish public, with an Irish Times/Ipsos poll earlier this year finding 63 percent of voters remained in favor of it.

And very few voices in Ireland are calling to join NATO.

Left-winger Catherine Connolly, who won Ireland’s presidential election in October by a landslide, is seen as a pacifist.

“I will be a voice for peace, a voice that builds on our policy of neutrality,” she said in her victory speech.