New Iran-based Al-Qaeda head ‘a potential asset to Tehran’

Saif Al-Adel (L), one of the most senior members of Al-Qaeda, has been tipped to take over from Ayman Zawahiri (R), who has not been seen in years and is rumored to be dead. (FBI/Wikimedia Commons)
Short Url
Updated 26 February 2021
Follow

New Iran-based Al-Qaeda head ‘a potential asset to Tehran’

  • Saif Al-Adel is a former Egyptian general with a long history of involvement in the world’s most infamous terror attacks
  • Likely leader limited by his Iranian confinement, but the group still poses a threat in the Middle East, Europe and, increasingly, Africa

LONDON: A former general in the Egyptian military could be the new leader of Al-Qaeda, but his confinement in Iran and potential value as a pawn in US-Iran negotiations mean that his vast military and terrorist experience may not herald a resurgence of the group to 9/11-era levels, according to an expert.

Saif Al-Adel, one of the most senior members of Al-Qaeda, has been tipped to take over from Ayman Zawahiri, who has not been seen in years and is rumored to be dead. 

Al-Adel has been an active terrorist for over 30 years, and the US has placed a $7.5 million bounty on his head for his role in the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed 224.

He is also said to have been involved in the 1993 “Black Hawk Down” battle in the Somalian capital Mogadishu, as well as having been instrumental in building the network behind the 9/11 attacks in New York. 

Philip Riding, lead analyst for Middle East and Africa at intelligence firm Sibylline, told Arab News that, while Al-Adel’s reputation as a skilled leader and military strategist remains cause for concern, his confinement in Iran is likely to hamper his leadership capacities. 

“Whatever Al-Adel’s considerable military experience — as a former Egyptian general — his isolation in Iran and ability to communicate with the remnants of his organization scattered across the world are much more pertinent,” he said.

“Saif Al-Adel is one of a number of high-ranking AQ leaders based in Iran. Al-Adel was previously under house arrest there, but in recent years has clearly been allowed greater freedoms, including the ability to travel abroad.”

He continued: “He is potentially valuable for the Iranians and they will be unwilling to see him depart permanently — men like Al-Adel and the freedom they are afforded are useful bargaining chips for Iran in its negotiations with the Biden administration.

“Moreover, despite potentially becoming pawns in the US-Iran confrontation, Al-Adel and the AQ leaders in Iran have few alternative bases of operation.”

He added: “These constraints will limit Al-Adel’s ability to implement any coherent strategy.”

However, Riding warned that Al-Qaeda, despite its leader’s confinement, still poses a security threat.

He said that the group “will likely try to continue to radicalize individuals or small groups in Europe, but there is little reason to think that they will be more successful now than in the past five to 10 years.” 

European security forces have become more adept at thwarting the kinds of attacks Al-Qaeda seeks to conduct, Riding said, but other places may not be so effective. 

Al-Qaeda “may prefer to focus its effort where its local affiliates have enjoyed most success in recent years.”

Riding pointed to the Sahel region, specifically Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, which has suffered at the hands of Al-Qaeda affiliate Jama’at Nasr Al-Islam wa-l’Muslimin (JNIM) for years, as a potential area of expansion for Al-Adel’s Al-Qaeda. 

Already, he said, JNIM “has freedom of operation over a large area of the Sahel and regularly conducts attacks.” 

Riding warned: “If Al-Adel was intelligent and influential enough, and willing to do so, he could potentially push JNIM back toward launching attacks on Western targets in the Sahel.”


Trump says ‘hopefully’ no need for military action against Iran

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Trump says ‘hopefully’ no need for military action against Iran

  • US president said he is speaking with Iran and left open the possibility of avoiding a military operation
  • An Iranian military spokesman warned Tehran’s response to any US action would not be limited
PARIS: US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he hoped to avoid military action against Iran, which has threatened to strike American bases and aircraft carriers in response to any attack.
Trump said he is speaking with Iran and left open the possibility of avoiding a military operation after earlier warning time was “running out” for Tehran as the United States sends a large naval fleet to the region.
When asked if he would have talks with Iran, Trump told reporters: “I have had and I am planning on it.”
“We have a group headed out to a place called Iran, and hopefully we won’t have to use it,” the US president added, while speaking to media at the premiere of a documentary about his wife Melania.
As Brussels and Washington dialed up their rhetoric and Iran issued stark threats this week, UN chief Antonio Guterres has called for nuclear negotiations to “avoid a crisis that could have devastating consequences in the region.”
An Iranian military spokesman warned Tehran’s response to any US action would not be limited — as it was in June last year when American planes and missiles briefly joined Israel’s short air war against Iran — but would be a decisive response “delivered instantly.”
Brig. Gen. Mohammad Akraminia told state television US aircraft carriers have “serious vulnerabilities” and that numerous American bases in the Gulf region are “within the range of our medium-range missiles.”
“If such a miscalculation is made by the Americans, it will certainly not unfold the way Trump imagines — carrying out a quick operation and then, two hours later, tweeting that the operation is over,” he said.
An official in the Gulf, where states host US military sites, said that fears of a US strike on Iran are “very clear.”
“It would bring the region into chaos, it would hurt the economy not just in the region but in the US and cause oil and gas prices to skyrocket,” the official added.
‘Protests crushed in blood’
Qatar’s leader Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian held a call to discuss “efforts being made to de-escalate tensions and establish stability,” the Qatar News Agency (QNA) reported.
The European Union, meanwhile, piled on the pressure by designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a “terrorist organization” over a deadly crackdown on recent mass protests.
“’Terrorist’ is indeed how you call a regime that crushes its own people’s protests in blood,” said EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, welcoming the “overdue” decision.
Though largely symbolic, the EU decision has already drawn a warning from Tehran.
Iran’s military slammed “the illogical, irresponsible and spite-driven action of the European Union,” alleging the bloc was acting out of “obedience” to Tehran’s arch-foes the United States and Israel.
Iranian officials have blamed the recent protest wave on the two countries, claiming their agents spurred “riots” and a “terrorist operation” that hijacked peaceful rallies sparked over economic grievances.
Rights groups have said thousands of people were killed during the protests by security forces, including the IRGC — the ideological arm of Tehran’s military.
In Tehran on Thursday, citizens expressed grim resignation.
“I think the war is inevitable and a change must happen. It can be for worse, or better. I am not sure,” said a 29-year-old waitress, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
“I am not in favor of war. I just want something to happen that would result in something better.”
Another 29-year-old woman, an unemployed resident of an upscale neighborhood in northern Tehran, said: “I believe that life has highs and lows and we are now at the lowest point.”
Trump had threatened military action if protesters were killed in the anti-government demonstrations that erupted in late December and peaked on January 8 and 9.
But his more recent statements have turned to Iran’s nuclear program, which the West believes is aimed at making an atomic bomb.
On Wednesday, he said “time is running out” for Tehran to make a deal, warning the US naval strike group that arrived in Middle East waters on Monday was “ready, willing and able” to hit Iran.
Conflicting tolls
The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said it has confirmed 6,479 people were killed in the protests, as Internet restrictions imposed on January 8 continue to slow verification.
But rights groups warn the toll is likely far higher, with estimates in the tens of thousands.
Iranian authorities acknowledge that thousands were killed during the protests, giving a toll of more than 3,000 deaths, but say the majority were members of the security forces or bystanders killed by “rioters.”
Billboards and banners have gone up in the capital Tehran to bolster the authorities’ messages. One massive poster appears to show an American aircraft carrier being destroyed.