ISLAMABAD: The attorney general of Pakistan told the Islamabad High Court on Monday the government was ready to review new Internet rules approved last year and which critics have argued would give the government wide powers of censorship.
IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah was hearing a petition filed by the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and others against social media rules introduced by the government in November.
The attorney general informed the IHC that the government supported a review of the regulations and would invite all petitioners and relevant stakeholders for consultations.
Justice Minallah said the matter of enforcing social media rules involved Article-19 (Freedom of Speech) and Article-19A (Right to Information) of the constitution, which were “related to fundamental rights.”
“Court feels the government did not consult the stakeholders before promulgating the rules,” the judge was quoted by Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper as saying.
The attorney general assured the court that the petitioners would be consulted and the government was not looking to put a “complete restriction” on social media and did not believe closing any platforms was a “solution.”
He asked the court to give the government some time to review the rules in consultation with the Pakistan Telecom Authority (PTA) and other concerned stakeholders.
The chief justice advised the petitioners to express their concerns regarding the regulations in the meeting the attorney general would convene and to submit their contentions before him in writing.
“Let’s start this with a positive note,” he said.
The new rules were approved initially by Prime Minister Imran Khan’s cabinet last February but rolled out in November.
They give the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority “removal and blocking” powers of digital content that “harms, intimidates or excites disaffection” toward the government or poses a threat to the “integrity, security and defense of Pakistan”.
A service provider or social media company could face a fine up to 500 million rupees ($3.14 million) for non-compliance, which would in turn trigger a mechanism preventing the uploading and live streaming, particularly related to “terrorism, hate speech, pornography, incitement to violence and detrimental to national security”.
A platform has to act within 24 hours or, in case of an emergency, six hours to remove content. The rules also empower the telecom authority to block an entire online system.
In November, industry body, the Asia Internet Coalition, wrote a letter to PM Khan and said the new social media rules would prevent Pakistani citizens from accessing a free and open Internet and shut the country’s digital economy off from the rest of the world.
The Asia Internet Coalition was (AIC) set up in 2011 by Google, Facebook, Yahoo and eBay to lobby for free and open access to the Internet and to promote e-commerce. It has since expanded its membership.
In the letter to PM Khan, dated December 5 and seen by Arab News, web giants said: “We seek your assistance to ensure that your government makes critical changes to the Rules through a credible consultation process.”
“We would request for a credible consultation process where AIC members can provide substantive suggestions. AIC is not against regulation of social media, but we believe that the Rules must address crucial issues such as internationally recognized rights to individual expression and privacy.”
The AIC added: “The Rules, as currently notified and gazetted, would make it extremely difficult for AIC Members to make their platforms and services available to Pakistani users and businesses.”
The AIC said that during bilateral meetings with AIC and its member companies, the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority had committed to share a draft copy of the rules, but the rules were then updated by the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication on its website without due process.
“Industry stakeholders have therefore lost trust in the consultation process, because it is neither credible nor transparent,” the AIC letter said.
Pakistan government agrees to review new internet rules decried by critics
https://arab.news/pwxrz
Pakistan government agrees to review new internet rules decried by critics
- Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists has filed petition in the Islamabad High Court against social media rules introduced last November
- Attorney general tells court government supports a review of the regulations in consultation with relevant stakeholders and petitioners
Return of millions of Afghans from Pakistan and Iran pushes Afghanistan to the brink, UN warns
- Afghan authorities provide care packages for those returning that include food aid, cash, a telephone SIM card and transportation
- But the returns have strained resources in a country struggling with a weak economy, severe drought and two devastating earthquakes
GENEVA: The return of millions of Afghans from neighboring Pakistan and Iran is pushing Afghanistan to the brink, the U.N. refugee agency said on Friday, describing an unprecedented scale of returns.
A total of 5.4 million people have returned to Afghanistan since October 2023, mostly from the two neighboring countries, UNHCR’s Afghanistan representative Arafat Jamal said, speaking to a U.N. briefing in Geneva via video link from Kabul, the Afghan capital.
“This is massive, and the speed and scale of these returns has pushed Afghanistan nearly to the brink,” Jamal said.
Pakistan launched a sweeping crackdown in Oct. 2023 to expel migrants without documents, urging those in the country to leave of their own accord to avoid arrest and forcible deportation and forcibly expelling others. Iran also began a crackdown on migrants at around the same time.
Since then, millions have streamed across the border into Afghanistan, including people who were born in Pakistan decades ago and had built lives and created businesses there.
Last year alone, 2.9 million people returned to Afghanistan, Jamal said, noting it was “the largest number of returns that we have witnessed to any single country.”
Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers have criticized the mass expulsions.
Afghanistan was already struggling with a dire humanitarian situation and a poor human rights record, particularly relating to women and girls, and the massive influx of people amounting to 12% of the population has put the country under severe strain, Jamal said.
Already in just the month and a half since the start of this year, about 150,000 people had returned to Afghanistan, he added.
Afghan authorities provide care packages for those returning that include some food aid, cash, a telephone SIM card and transportation to parts of the country where they might have family. But the returns have strained resources in a country that was already struggling to cope with a weak economy and the effects of a severe drought and two devastating earthquakes.
In November, the U.N. development program said nine out of 10 families in areas of Afghanistan with high rates of return were resorting to what are known as negative coping mechanisms — either skipping meals, falling into debt or selling their belongings to survive.
“We are deeply concerned about the sustainability of these returns,” Jamal said, noting that while 5% of those who return say they will leave Afghanistan again, more than 10% say they know of someone who has already left.
“These decisions, I would underscore, to undertake dangerous journeys, are not driven by a lack of a desire to remain in the country, on the contrary, but the reality that many are unable to rebuild their viable and dignified lives,” he said.
