India’s coronavirus caseload surges again

India’s total number of confirmed coronavirus cases is at 173,763 with 4,971 deaths. Above, residents wear masks travel in a ferry in Kochi, Kerala stat on May 29, 2020. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 30 May 2020
Follow

India’s coronavirus caseload surges again

  • Another record single-day jump of 7,964 coronavirus cases
  • India has surpassed China both in terms of confirmed cases and deaths from the disease

NEW DELHI: India on Saturday registered another record single-day jump of 7,964 coronavirus cases and 265 deaths, a day before the 2-month-old lockdown is set to end.
The Health Ministry put the total number of confirmed cases at 173,763 with 4,971 deaths. The infections include 82,369 people who have recovered.
More than 70 percent of the cases are concentrated in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, New Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan states.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in an open letter marking the first year of his government’s second term, said India was on the path to victory in its battle against the virus. He said India will set “an example in economic revival” and asked the nation to show a “firm resolve.”
Modi also acknowledged the “tremendous suffering” of millions of migrant workers who had lost their jobs during the lockdown and have been forced to make grueling and dangerous trips back to their hometowns.
The federal government is expected to issue a new set of guidelines this weekend, possibly extending the lockdown in worst-hit areas.
India started easing lockdown restrictions earlier this month, allowing reopening of shops and manufacturing and resumption of some train links and domestic flights.
Subways, schools and colleges, hotels and restaurants remain shuttered nationwide.
India has surpassed China both in terms of confirmed cases and deaths from the disease.


Activist Peter Tatchell arrested over ‘globalize the intifada’ placard

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Activist Peter Tatchell arrested over ‘globalize the intifada’ placard

  • Arrest in London during Saturday protest an ‘attack on free speech,’ his foundation says
  • Intifada ‘does not mean violence and is not antisemitic,’ veteran campaigner claims

LONDON: Prominent activist Peter Tatchell was arrested at a pro-Palestine march in central London, The Independent reported.

According to his foundation, the 74-year-old was arrested for holding a placard that said: “Globalize the intifada: Nonviolent resistance. End Israel’s occupation of Gaza & West Bank.”

The Peter Tatchell Foundation said in a statement that the activist labeled his Saturday arrest as an “attack on free speech.”

It added: “The police claimed the word intifada is unlawful. The word intifada is not a crime in law. The police are engaged in overreach by making it an arrestable offense.

“This is part of a dangerous trend to increasingly restrict and criminalize peaceful protests.”

Tatchell described the word “intifada,” an Arab term, as meaning “uprising, rebellion or resistance against Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

“It does not mean violence and is not antisemitic. It is against the Israeli regime and its war crimes, not against Jewish people.”

According to his foundation, Tatchell was transported to Sutton police station to be detained following his arrest.

In December last year, London’s Metropolitan Police said that pro-Palestine protesters chanting “globalize the intifada” would face arrest, attributing the new rules to a “changing context” in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack in Australia.

“Officers policing the Palestine Coalition protest have arrested a 74-year-old man on suspicion of a public order offense. He was seen carrying a sign including the words ‘globalize the intifada’,” the Metropolitan Police said on X.

According to a witness, Tatchell had been marching near police officers with the placard for about a mile when the group came across a counterprotest.

He was then stopped and “manhandled by 10 officers,” said Jacky Summerfield, who accompanied Tatchell at the protest.

“I was shoved back behind a cordon of officers and unable to speak to him after that,” she said.

“I couldn’t get any closer to hear anything more than that; it was for Section 5 (of the Public Order Act).

“There had been no issue until that. He was walking near the police officers. Nobody had said or done anything.”