US forces in Afghanistan dismiss Taliban claims of peace deal violations

A photo taken on June 6, 2019, showing US soldiers looking over hill sides in the Nerkh district of Wardak province, Afghanistan.( AFP/ File photo)
Short Url
Updated 05 April 2020
Follow

US forces in Afghanistan dismiss Taliban claims of peace deal violations

  • Taliban have carried out hundreds of attacks across Afghanistan in recent weeks
  • Insurgents claim American, Afghan forces conducted airstrikes despite pledging not to

KABUL: US forces in Afghanistan dismissed Taliban allegations that the US had violated the terms of the Doha agreement, and said they would continue to defend their partners in compliance with the deal. 
The Afghan Taliban on Sunday accused the United States of violating parts of a historic peace deal, warning that further infringements could damage trust between the two sides.
But a spokesman for the US military, Col. Sonny Leggett, rejected the Taliban’s allegations on Sunday as “baseless.”
“USFOR-A has upheld, and continues to uphold, the military terms of the US-TB agreement; any assertion otherwise is baseless. USFOR-A has been clear- we will defend our ANDSF partners if attacked, in compliance with the agreement,” he said in a Twitter post.
As part of the deal struck between the two sides in Qatar in February, Washington agreed to facilitate the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners held by President Ashraf Ghani’s government in early March. Though the Taliban agreed to a one-week reduction in violence leading up to the signing of the peace deal, violence began surging after a delay in the prisoner release. 

US forces have been carrying out airstrikes against the insurgents since days after the agreement was inked in Doha and late last month, the New York Times reported the Taliban had carried out more than 300 attacks across Afghanistan in a single week, with major assaults in three northern provinces. 
But the Taliban statement said on Sunday the group had remained committed to the agreement and had “fully observed” it.
“There have been flagrant violations from the Americans and their local and foreign colleagues against us,” the statement said.
One of the peace agreement’s top conditions was for Washington to withdraw all its troops from Afghanistan within 14 months of signing the deal.
In return, the Taliban had pledged they would not use areas under their control to stage attacks against the world’s or US interests.
The Taliban statement further said American and Afghan forces had conducted airstrikes against civilian sites, while the Taliban have avoided staging attacks in cities and organizing significant strikes against government forces.
“Since we have witnessed repeated ignorance in this regard, we seriously demand the American side to observe the contents of the agreement and also inform their other colleagues to do so, too,” the insurgents’ statement said.
It added that the Taliban had shared their concerns with the US through a communication channel set up by both sides for the purpose before issuing a warning.
“If these violations go on, an atmosphere of mistrust will be created which not only will damage the deal but will also force the Mujahideen for reciprocal reaction and would increase the extent of the fighting,” the statement said.
The historic peace deal was signed after nearly a year and half of intensive talks between the Taliban and Washington, without including Ghani’s government. 
The Afghan civilian government refused to comment on the Taliban’s statement, and said that since Washington had struck the deal with the insurgents, it was the American administration that needed to respond-- not Kabul.
It was not immediately possible to get a comment from the US embassy on the matter.
Shafiq Haqpal, an analyst, believes that the Taliban’s statement has been long in the making.
“The Taliban seemed upset privately in recent weeks because America failed to fulfil its pledges based on the deal. The statement now clearly shows the Taliban’s public dissatisfaction, and that will have its impact in the future if not settled,” Haqpal said.


Cuba says a 5th person died after people on a Florida-flagged speedboat opened fire on soldiers

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Cuba says a 5th person died after people on a Florida-flagged speedboat opened fire on soldiers

  • Authorities in Cuba said that on Feb. 26 Cuban soldiers confronted a speedboat carrying 10 people as the vessel approached the island and opened fire on the troops
  • The shooting threatened to increase tensions between US President Donald Trump and Cuban authorities

HAVANA: Cuba said a fifth person has died as a consequence of a fatal shootout last month involving a Florida-flagged speedboat that allegedly opened fire on soldiers in waters off the island nation’s north coast.
The island’s interior ministry said late Thursday in a statement that Roberto Álvarez Ávila died on March 4 as a result of his injuries. It added that the remaining injured detainees “continue to receive specialized medical care according to their health status.”
Authorities in Cuba said that on Feb. 26 Cuban soldiers confronted a speedboat carrying 10 people as the vessel approached the island and opened fire on the troops. They said the passengers were armed Cubans living in the US who were trying to infiltrate the island and “unleash terrorism”. Cuba said its soldiers killed four people and wounded six others.
“The statements made by the detainees themselves, together with a series of investigative procedures, reinforce the evidence against them,” the Cuban interior ministry said in its statement, adding that “new elements are being obtained that establish the involvement of other individuals based in the US”
Earlier this week, Cuba said it had filed terrorism charges against six suspects that were on the speedboat. The government unveiled items said to have been found on the boat, including a dozen high-powered weapons, more than 12,800 pieces of ammunition and 11 pistols.
Cuban authorities have provided few details about the shooting, but said the boat was roughly 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) northeast of Cayo Falcones, off the country’s north coast. They also provided the boat’s registration number, but The Associated Press was unable to readily verify the details because boat registrations are not public in the state of Florida.
The shooting threatened to increase tensions between US President Donald Trump and Cuban authorities. The island’s economy was until recently largely kept economically afloat by Venezuela’s oil, which is now in doubt after a US military operation deposed then-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.