Italy-Libya deal puts migrants in danger, say rights group

Migrants wait to be transferred off a boat during their rescue in international waters in the Mediterranean off the Libyan coast. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 February 2020
Follow

Italy-Libya deal puts migrants in danger, say rights group

  • Italy sees the Libyan coast guard as key to stemming a huge influx of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe

CAIRO: Human Rights Watch warned on Wednesday that Italy’s renewed support for the Libyan coast guard is putting migrants in danger who are returned to squalid detention centers in the North African country.

Italy sees the Libyan coast guard as key to stemming a huge influx of migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. The war in Libya, where rival militias are vying for control, has made the challenge of handling the migrant flows worse.

The New York-based watchdog urged Italy to suspend all funding and training for the coast guard until Libya shuts down militant-run detention centers in the country. About 5,000 migrants are languishing in dozens of filthy Libyan centers, where rape, torture and other abuses run rampant.

“Italy can’t paper over its complicity in the suffering of migrants and refugees who fall into the hands of the Libyan Coast Guard,” said Judith Sunderland, associate director of the Europe and Central Asia division at Human Rights Watch.

The UN refugee agency reports that the coast guard has picked up and returned roughly 40,000 migrants to war-ravaged Libya since the agreement was reached three years ago. The total number of migrants intercepted in the past month rose 121 percent from the same period last year.

Italy recently extended its contentious deal supporting the Libyan coast guard, drawing sharp criticism from humanitarian groups.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Italy’s foreign minister revealed that Rome has asked Libya to modify the accord to give humanitarian groups some responsibility for migrants intercepted by the coast guard. The proposal’s details remain vague.

Sunderland described the suggested changes as “tweaking” an already broken arrangement.

“Italian authorities should insist on the closure of detention centers, direct its resources to supporting safe alternatives to detention, increase evacuations from Libya, including directly to Italy, and resume a leadership role in saving lives at sea,” she said.


Israel MPs advance bill on Orthodox control of Western Wall

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Israel MPs advance bill on Orthodox control of Western Wall

  • Bill is the latest twist in the clash between Netanyahu’s coalition govt and the supreme court

JERUSALEM: Israeli lawmakers on Wednesday advanced a bill that would place the Western Wall under the exclusive authority of the Chief Rabbinate, effectively restricting non-Orthodox worship at the site’s mixed-gender prayer section.

Located in the Old City of Jerusalem, occupied by Israel in 1967, the Western Wall is the last remnant of the Second Temple destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD.

It is the holiest site at which Jews are permitted to pray by the rabbinate.

The plaza includes three prayer areas — the largest for men, another for women, and a smaller mixed area which is disapproved of by the official Israeli rabbinate, dominated by the ultra-Orthodox.

A bill introduced by far-right lawmaker Avi Maoz that would give the Chief Rabbinate full authority over all sections passed a preliminary parliamentary reading on Wednesday, with 56 lawmakers voting in favor and 47 against.

The legislation would define any activity contrary to the rabbinate’s directives — including non-Orthodox forms of worship — as a “desecration.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not present for the vote.

At the heart of the dispute lies the prayer area known as Ezrat Yisrael, established to accommodate mixed-gender worship.

Several non-Orthodox Jewish movements — predominant among Jewish communities in the US but a small minority in Israel — worship at the site but complain that it is hard to access and poorly laid out.

Seeking to make a gesture to the American Jewish community, a previous Netanyahu government had voted in 2016 for establishing the mixed-gender area, but backtracked the following year under pressure from its ultra-Orthodox allies.

As such, the mixed space was established but not developed.

The bill advanced on Wednesday is the latest twist in the clash between Netanyahu’s coalition government, one of the most right-wing in Israel’s history, and the Supreme Court, whose powers the government has sought to curtail since it took office in 2022.

Last week the court ordered the government and Jerusalem municipality to act on long-delayed plans to develop and improve the mixed-gender section, including issuing building permits that had been stalled for nearly a decade.

The court did not directly rule on theological matters but emphasized that prior government commitments could no longer remain indefinitely suspended.

In response, Justice Minister Yariv Levin urged lawmakers to support Maoz’s bill in order to block what he described as unacceptable interference by the top court in religious affairs.