Climate change pushes investors to take their temperature

Reallocation of capital from high polluting sectors to green alternatives has taken on greater importance as investors become climate conscious . (Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 21 January 2020

Climate change pushes investors to take their temperature

LONDON: Move over revenue growth and dividend payouts: It’s time to take your portfolio’s temperature.

Policymakers are pushing investors to do more to ensure their choices help to meet the 2015 Paris Agreement to combat climate change by limiting planetary warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, and preferably to 1.5C.

A vanguard of insurers and pension funds, many in Davos this week for the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, say part of the answer is a new “temperature score” that gives a snapshot of how investments contribute to climate change.

A single score, they say, can help navigate the reallocation of capital from polluting sectors of the global economy likely to take a financial hit to green profitable companies.

So far, the temperature metric has been adopted by only a handful of financial institutions, but the buzz generated shows how investors’ concerns about climate risk are finally going mainstream.

“There’s still a massive amount of work to be done on this but it’s very encouraging that we as an industry are being forced to answer this temperature score question,” said Mark Lewis, head of sustainability research at BNP Paribas Asset Management. “If you thought you could ignore climate change before, you just can’t anymore.”

France is leading the way with 18 firms, including insurer AXA and reinsurer Scor, disclosing temperature scores of all or part of their portfolios in 2018. UK regulators have flagged they could require banks and insurers to report temperature scores from 2021 in annual portfolio stress tests.

Asset manager Standard Life Aberdeen, German reinsurer Munich Re, Swiss rival Swiss Re and Zurich Insurance told Reuters they were considering the same.

Temperature scores are one of several investor-led initiatives to emerge as policymakers crank up pressure on the financial industry.

The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, a European body of mainly pension funds and asset managers with €30 trillion ($33 trillion) of combined assets under management, launched an initiative in May to work out how members could back the Paris goals.

That was followed by the launch of the “Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance” at a UN climate summit in September. The group, 16 insurers and pension funds with combined assets of almost $4 trillion, has pledged to align investments with the Paris targets.

The world’s biggest asset manager, BlackRock, last week announced an overhaul of the way it approaches climate risk. CEO Larry Fink told the companies it holds stakes in that sustainable investing was the “strongest foundation” for client portfolios. Generation Investment Management, a fund co-founded by former US Vice President Al Gore with $25 billion of assets invested according to environmental and sustainability criteria, says temperature scores are an important development.

“This is an incremental indicator dial to help the stakeholder community engage in the urgency of the transition,” David Blood, co-founder and senior partner, told Reuters.

Despite enthusiasm for temperature scores, a dearth of standardised data, methodologies and disclosure make it hard to calculate meaningful numbers.

Andrew Howard, head of sustainable research at UK asset manager Schroders, said his company was actively looking at adopting temperature scores but warned it would be robust. “There are a bunch of challenges here that you’ve got to work,” he said.

Investors have already been struggling with a comparatively simpler metric: The amount of greenhouse gases a company produces. Increasingly firms are estimating their “carbon intensity” based on the ratio of emissions to revenue.

A portfolio temperature score, though, requires more complex calculations, including how companies contribute to global emissions and their planned reductions over time.

Those numbers are then crunched with assumptions about the relationship between emissions and temperatures. The calculation gets more complicated when factoring in uncertainty about how the world might conceivably achieve net zero emissions by 2050 — the target scientists say is needed to cap global temperature rises at 1.5C.

“The biggest question mark is what exactly that pathway is going to look like,” said Mara Childress at the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), a global initiative launched by Bank of England Governor Mark Carney.

The TCFD said it was considering its position on the possible utility of temperature scores.

The challenge becomes harder when investors look beyond stocks and corporate bonds to real estate and infrastructure, where there is less transparency over emissions, or to sovereign debt, where investors have less scope to engage with borrowers.

Nevertheless, advisory firms say that as data improves, the differences between companies poised to benefit from the transition to a low carbon world, and those that will suffer, will become clearer.

“A warming potential metric really helps you to understand which constituents of a portfolio ... are really the climate culprits,” said David Lunsford, co-founder of Carbon Delta, part of data analytics and index company MSCI.

“You could be exposed to a lot of risk if you pick companies not aligned with a sustainable future.”

Scientists have issued climate warnings for decades but investors have only begun to pay real attention in the last few years.

The TCFD, which is backed by the G20, is encouraging companies and banks to reveal more about the climate risks they face, as a precursor to making disclosures mandatory.

Regulators are issuing increasingly strident warnings over the dangers extreme weather poses to economies and the risk that oil and gas infrastructure could be left stranded by a rapid transition to clean energy.

Scientists warn that rises of several degrees could push global food systems to collapse, create many millions of refugees and wipe out coastal cities.

Related


Nissan’s new CEO willing to be fired if no turnaround at Japanese giant

Updated 18 February 2020

Nissan’s new CEO willing to be fired if no turnaround at Japanese giant

  • Makoto Uchida, who took over the top job in December, put his job on the line at the automaker’s shareholders’ meeting
  • Uchida pleaded with shareholders to be patient while he comes up with a plan by May to recover from crumbling profits

YOKOHAMA: Nissan’s new chief executive said on Tuesday he would accept being fired if he fails to turn around Japan’s second biggest automaker which is grappling with plunging sales in the aftermath of the scandal surrounding ex-chairman Carlos Ghosn.
Makoto Uchida, who took over the top job in December, put his job on the line at the automaker’s shareholders’ meeting, where he faced demands ranging from cutting executive pay to offering a bounty to bring Ghosn back to Japan after he fled to Lebanon.
Nissan’s worsening performance has heaped pressure on Uchida, formerly Nissan’s China chief who became its third CEO since September, to come up with aggressive steps to revive the company.
On Tuesday, Uchida, who was repeatedly heckled by shareholders, said he was ready to face dismissal if he failed to improve profitability at the company, which is on course to post its worst annual operating profit in 11 years.
“We will make sure that we steer the company in an effective way so that it is visible in the eyes of viewers. I will commit to this: if the circumstances remain uncertain you can fire me immediately,” he said.
Uchida, 53, did not give a timeframe for improving Nissan’s performance.
The new boss must prove to the board he can accelerate cost-cutting and rebuild profits at the 86-year-old Japanese giant, and that he has the right strategy to repair its partnership with France’s Renault, sources have told Reuters.
Uchida pleaded with shareholders to be patient while he comes up with a plan by May to recover from crumbling profits and a corporate shake-up following Ghosn’s arrest in Japan in late 2018 over financial misconduct charges.
“If you can be patient a little bit longer, on a day-to-day basis you will be able to sense we are changing,” he said.
Ahead of the meeting, some shareholders demanded more clarity about Uchida’s plan.
“I just want to know what the plan for recovery is. At the moment, the share price has dropped again, and the value of the company has plummeted,” said a 70-year-old former employee who owns shares in the company.
“If this is the situation, part of me thinks that we would be better off with Ghosn ... If we don’t get a clearer vision of the path the company is taking, it will be a worry.”
Nissan’s shares are trading around their lowest level in more than a decade following its latest earnings.
Last week, Nissan cut its dividend outlook to its lowest since the 2011 financial year, after dwindling car sales drove the company to post its first quarterly net loss in nearly a decade.
Shareholders gathered at the extraordinary meeting in Yokohama to vote in new directors including Uchida and Chief Operating Officer Ashwani Gupta.
Their appointments highlight a changing of the guard at Nissan, as shareholders were also voting on motions for former company stalwarts, CEO Hiroto Saikawa and COO Yashuhiro Yamauchi, to leave their board director positions.