Colombia protesters vow new strike after talks hit snag

Students protest for Dilan Cruz who protested against the Colombian government and died yesterday, in Medellin, Colombia on November 26, 2019. (File/AFP)
Updated 27 November 2019
Follow

Colombia protesters vow new strike after talks hit snag

  • Protesters are demonstrating about issues that include inequality, corruption and continued violence in rural areas
  • Activists also oppose rumored pension and labor reforms that the government insists do not exist

BOGOTA, Colombia: President Ivan Duque met for two hours with a protest steering committee Tuesday, but neither side was able to agree on a clear path forward and demonstrators vowed to hold a new national strike instead.

Diogenes Medina, a union organizer on the National Strike Committee, said protesters want a separate dialogue with Duque rather than inclusion in the “national conversation” that the president has begun with various societal sectors.

“We’re willing to keep talking,” Medina said. But, he added, “We’ve told the government we want an independent initiative and are waiting for their response.”

The talks appeared to be the most promising avenue out of nearly a week of daily demonstrations bringing students, workers and other Colombians upset with Duque’s conservative government to the streets. Absent a quick resolution, the organizers said they would intensify their street protests in the days ahead.

“The government has not given a response to the points presented,” student leader José Cárdenas said. “The reasons for the strike continue.”

The strike being called for Wednesday comes nearly a week after 250,000 Colombians marched in one of the nation’s largest protests in recent history. In the days since, there have been smaller demonstrations, leading to the deaths of three people in looting incidents and an 18-year-old student who was fatally injured during a protest.

Protesters are demonstrating about issues that include inequality, corruption and continued violence in rural areas, where more than 100 social leaders have been assassinated since Duque took office last year.

“We’re in a terrible state,” said Blanca Rocha, a housewife who supports the protests. “The country is taking a step backwards every day.”

Vice President Marta Lucía Ramírez described the meeting between Duque and protest leaders as “constructive” and said the government shares many of their concerns, including improving education and work opportunities.

Duque launched what he calls a “national conversation” with diverse sectors of society on Sunday aimed at including citizens in drafting solutions. He prefers a conversation in which not just the National Strike Committee is at the table.

“The president is opening a much broader space,” Ramírez said. “In any event, the president has invited them, when they want to return, to sit at the table.”

Following Tuesday’s meeting with the strike committee, Duque announced a new economic proposal that includes measures like refunds on the nation’s value added tax for the poorest 20% of Colombians. The reforms, which Duque said have been discussed with several parties, also aim to reduce health insurance payments for elderly people with small pensions and give tax breaks to companies that hire young adults.

“This proves that we can work as a team,” Duque said in a speech surrounded by politicians who worked on the bill. “Together we can implement social reforms that make a difference in the life of this country.”

Protest leaders are demanding bolder measures. On Tuesday, the strike committee presented the government with a list of 13 demands that include the dissolution of riot police, which have been accused of using excessive force against protesters. The strike committee is also seeking the suspension of a tax bill that has been presented to congress and wants the government to promise it will not privatize state run companies.

Activists also oppose rumored pension and labor reforms that the government insists do not exist, but which have nonetheless been discussed by think tanks and Cabinet ministers.

Meanwhile, Duque received messages from members of his own party urging him not to cave in to protesters’ demands.

“President Duque, don’t let your political agenda be changed by a group whose goal is to topple you, to destabilize the country and impose communism,” Maria del Rosario Guerra, a prominent senator from Duque’s Democratic Center party, wrote on Twitter.
Alex Reina, a professor of government at ESAP University in Medellin, said the large variety of demands presented by the protest committee was inevitable.

“This government has long failed to engage in dialogue with social movements,” Reina said. “So now the strike committee has come up with a list of petitions with which they are trying to prove that they represent a broad swath of society and that their movement has substance.”
Reina said Duque is in a difficult spot, as social movements that are mobilizing thousands of people pressure him to make big policy changes, while members of his own party demand that he hold to the conservative platform on which he was elected.

“He is stuck in the crossfire,” the professor said. “Nobody is happy with what he’s doing.”


Top UN court to hear Rohingya genocide case against Myanmar

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Top UN court to hear Rohingya genocide case against Myanmar

THE HAGUE: Did Myanmar commit genocide against its Rohingya Muslim minority? That’s what judges at the International Court of Justice will weigh during three weeks of hearings starting Monday.
The Gambia brought the case accusing Myanmar of breaching the 1948 Genocide Convention during a crackdown in 2017.
Legal experts are watching closely as it could give clues for how the court will handle similar accusations against Israel over its military campaign in Gaza, a case brought to the ICJ by South Africa.
Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya Muslims fled violence by the Myanmar army and Buddhist militias, escaping to neighboring Bangladesh and bringing harrowing accounts of mass rape, arson and murder.
Today, 1.17 million Rohingya live crammed into dilapidated camps spread over 8,000 acres in Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh.
From there, mother-of-two Janifa Begum told AFP: “I want to see whether the suffering we endured is reflected during the hearing.”
“We want justice and peace,” said the 37-year-old.

’Senseless killings’

The Gambia, a Muslim-majority country in West Africa, brought the case in 2019 to the ICJ, which rules in disputes between states.
Under the Genocide Convention, any country can file a case at the ICJ against any other it believes is in breach of the treaty.
In December 2019, lawyers for the African nation presented evidence of what they said were “senseless killings... acts of barbarity that continue to shock our collective conscience.”
In a landmark moment at the Peace Palace courthouse in The Hague, Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi appeared herself to defend her country.
She dismissed Banjul’s argument as a “misleading and incomplete factual picture” of what she said was an “internal armed conflict.”
The former democracy icon warned that the genocide case at the ICJ risked reigniting the crisis, which she said was a response to attacks by Rohingya militants.
Myanmar has always maintained the crackdown by its armed forces, known as the Tatmadaw, was justified to root out Rohingya insurgents after a series of attacks left a dozen security personnel dead.

‘Physical destruction’

The ICJ initially sided with The Gambia, which had asked judges for “provisional measures” to halt the violence while the case was being considered.
The court in 2020 said Myanmar must take “all measures within its power” to halt any acts prohibited in the 1948 UN Genocide Convention.
These acts included “killing members of the group” and “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
The United States officially declared that the violence amounted to genocide in 2022, three years after a UN team said Myanmar harbored “genocidal intent” toward the Rohingya.
The hearings, which wrap up on January 30, represent the heart of the case.
The court had already thrown out a 2022 Myanmar challenge to its jurisdiction, so judges believe they have the power to rule on the genocide issue.
A final decision could take months or even years and while the ICJ has no means of enforcing its decisions, a ruling in favor of The Gambia would heap more political pressure on Myanmar.
Suu Kyi will not be revisiting the Peace Palace. She has been detained since a 2021 coup, on charges rights groups say were politically motivated.
The ICJ is not the only court looking into possible genocide against the Rohingya.
The International Criminal Court, also based in The Hague, is investigating military chief Min Aung Hlaing for suspected crimes against humanity.
Another case is being heard in Argentina under the principle of universal jurisdiction, the idea that some crimes are so heinous they can be heard in any court.