Top UN court to hear Rohingya genocide case against Myanmar

Rohingya refugee children surround a street vendor at the Kutupalong refugee camp in Ukhia on January 11, 2026. (Photo by MH Mustafa / AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 January 2026
Follow

Top UN court to hear Rohingya genocide case against Myanmar

THE HAGUE: Did Myanmar commit genocide against its Rohingya Muslim minority? That’s what judges at the International Court of Justice will weigh during three weeks of hearings starting Monday.
The Gambia brought the case accusing Myanmar of breaching the 1948 Genocide Convention during a crackdown in 2017.
Legal experts are watching closely as it could give clues for how the court will handle similar accusations against Israel over its military campaign in Gaza, a case brought to the ICJ by South Africa.
Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya Muslims fled violence by the Myanmar army and Buddhist militias, escaping to neighboring Bangladesh and bringing harrowing accounts of mass rape, arson and murder.
Today, 1.17 million Rohingya live crammed into dilapidated camps spread over 8,000 acres in Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh.
From there, mother-of-two Janifa Begum told AFP: “I want to see whether the suffering we endured is reflected during the hearing.”
“We want justice and peace,” said the 37-year-old.

’Senseless killings’

The Gambia, a Muslim-majority country in West Africa, brought the case in 2019 to the ICJ, which rules in disputes between states.
Under the Genocide Convention, any country can file a case at the ICJ against any other it believes is in breach of the treaty.
In December 2019, lawyers for the African nation presented evidence of what they said were “senseless killings... acts of barbarity that continue to shock our collective conscience.”
In a landmark moment at the Peace Palace courthouse in The Hague, Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi appeared herself to defend her country.
She dismissed Banjul’s argument as a “misleading and incomplete factual picture” of what she said was an “internal armed conflict.”
The former democracy icon warned that the genocide case at the ICJ risked reigniting the crisis, which she said was a response to attacks by Rohingya militants.
Myanmar has always maintained the crackdown by its armed forces, known as the Tatmadaw, was justified to root out Rohingya insurgents after a series of attacks left a dozen security personnel dead.

‘Physical destruction’

The ICJ initially sided with The Gambia, which had asked judges for “provisional measures” to halt the violence while the case was being considered.
The court in 2020 said Myanmar must take “all measures within its power” to halt any acts prohibited in the 1948 UN Genocide Convention.
These acts included “killing members of the group” and “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
The United States officially declared that the violence amounted to genocide in 2022, three years after a UN team said Myanmar harbored “genocidal intent” toward the Rohingya.
The hearings, which wrap up on January 30, represent the heart of the case.
The court had already thrown out a 2022 Myanmar challenge to its jurisdiction, so judges believe they have the power to rule on the genocide issue.
A final decision could take months or even years and while the ICJ has no means of enforcing its decisions, a ruling in favor of The Gambia would heap more political pressure on Myanmar.
Suu Kyi will not be revisiting the Peace Palace. She has been detained since a 2021 coup, on charges rights groups say were politically motivated.
The ICJ is not the only court looking into possible genocide against the Rohingya.
The International Criminal Court, also based in The Hague, is investigating military chief Min Aung Hlaing for suspected crimes against humanity.
Another case is being heard in Argentina under the principle of universal jurisdiction, the idea that some crimes are so heinous they can be heard in any court.


Carnival tribute to Brazil’s Lula in Rio sparks political backlash

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Carnival tribute to Brazil’s Lula in Rio sparks political backlash

  • Opposition claims tribute to Lula is illegal early campaigning
  • Lula’s aides take ‌precautions to avoid election law violations
RIO DE JANEIRO: When Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva learned that a samba school in Rio de Janeiro would base its carnival parade this year on his journey from factory worker to president, he broke into tears and ​then smiled for pictures holding the school’s flag.
But, as Rio’s world-famous carnival parade approached, the tribute became a political headache.
Opposition parties and politicians have filed a flurry of lawsuits alleging that Lula is benefiting from what they describe as an illegal form of early campaigning ahead of this year’s presidential election. The president hopes to be elected for his fourth nonconsecutive term in October.
Courts have already rejected all but one of the lawsuits, including one that asked judges to stop the parade from taking place. But more could be filed if critics believe politicians used the event, scheduled to happen on Sunday night, to ask for votes, which would be illegal.
Still, Lula is planning to watch samba school Academicos de Niteroi sing and dance to his and his mother’s life stories on Sunday in Rio, his aides told ‌Reuters, but he won’t ‌be speaking at any moment. The president’s wife Rosangela “Janja” da Silva’s plans to take part ​in ‌the ⁠parade are ​under ⁠review, people familiar with the government’s thinking told Reuters.
“It’s not campaigning,” said Tiago Martins, a carnival parade designer at Academicos de Niteroi. “It’s a plot that tells the life story of a warrior of a man, who despite all obstacles got to the presidency.”
Critics disagree, pointing, for example, to mentions of the number 13 in the song’s lyrics, the same one that Lula and his Workers Party use on the ballot box.
“This is the kind of thing you see in a Soviet republic, in North Korea, an ode to the great leader,” said lawmaker Marcel Van Hattem, a leader of the opposition Novo Party, which filed one of the lawsuits against Lula.

PARTY WITH RESTRAINT, MINISTERS ARE TOLD
The parade designed by Academicos de ⁠Niteroi describes the president’s childhood in the country’s impoverished Northeastern region and his mother’s journey to Sao ‌Paulo with her children in search of a better life.
“I saw myself in my ‌children’s eyes, frightened and empty. With my heart in pieces, I set out in ​search of love and of my dreams,” the lyrics say.
Artists at ‌Academicos de Niteroi sought the president’s authorization to use his life’s story last year, before going forward with their plan. After they ‌received it, Lula welcomed Martins and other members of the samba school for a dinner at his Alvorada presidential residence in September.
As they sang the song they had written for the parade, Lula became emotional and cried, people who were in the meeting told Reuters. He later described it as a tribute to his mother, Dona Lindu, rather than to himself.
Lula’s aides acknowledged the political sensitivity of the moment to Reuters. After the lawsuits multiplied, the president’s team ‌consulted legal advisers to clarify what restrictions apply during the pre-campaign period.
Ministers attending the parade were instructed to remain seated in the audience, refrain from participating in the parade itself, avoid public ⁠funds for travel, and not make ⁠any election-related gestures, statements, or live posts on social media. Lula will not speak publicly at the parade.

OPPOSITION SAYS THE TRIBUTE CROSSES LEGAL LINES
Opposition figures argue the precautions show the government knows the tribute crosses legal lines.
They complain that Academicos de Niteroi received hundreds of thousands of dollars of public funds to do the parade.
But government lawyers stressed that all of Rio’s samba schools taking part in official parades received the same amount of resources and that funds are not tied to artistic choices.
All cases have been thrown out because judges either agreed with the government’s arguments or pointed to procedural issues. One case is still pending before the federal accounting court, though a preliminary ruling also rejected blocking funds to the parade.
While Lula has attended Rio’s carnival parade before as president, it is not common for presidents to do so.
One former president, Itamar Franco, famously got into trouble in the 1990s after being photographed next to a woman wearing no underwear at the parade.
For Martins, the carnival parade designer, the political clash has overshadowed what, for him, is a deeply personal artistic achievement.
“The ​samba says it: there are children of the poor ​becoming doctors, and me, a child of the poor, becoming a carnival designer,” he said. “We wanted to tell the story of a man who did a lot for the poor and for Brazil.”