Most Arabs in the dark about Japan’s power structure

Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe delivers a policy speech from the podium at an extraordinary Diet (Parliament) session in Tokyo this month. (AFP)
Updated 29 October 2019
Follow

Most Arabs in the dark about Japan’s power structure

  • A YouGov poll of Arabs' perception of Japan finds confusion about executive authority
  • The prime minister was correctly identified as the final decision-maker by 44 percent

DUBAI: Many Arabs are not aware of Japan’s power structure, according to a YouGov survey of Arabs’ perception of the country, conducted for Arab News.
More than half (56 percent) of the 3,033 respondents from the GCC bloc, the Levant and North Africa, aged 16 or above, said they were unfamiliar with the power structure in Japan, although 44 percent correctly identified the prime minister as the final decision-maker.
“I don’t find this particularly surprising,” said Khobaib Osailan, a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
“There is little reason to expect a large number of Arabs to have an accurate knowledge of Japanese political structures.”
He told Arab News that while many Arabs are avid consumers of Japanese cultural products, from anime and manga to sushi, the majority do not view Japan as a key political player in the Arab world.
“Thus, there is little interest in gaining accurate knowledge of their internal political structure,” he said. “Also, many in the Arab world associate democracy with the West.
“For them, Japan is viewed as a model of economic success and less as a country with a democratically elected prime minister and an emperor with only ceremonial powers.” 

The nature of Japanese politics was another possible explanation, he said.
“While Japan is a democracy where parliamentary elections occur every four years, one party, that is the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), has been dominating government for at least six decades,” Osailan said.
“The lack of a heated and visible electoral competition may have reduced Arabs’ attention to Japanese politics.”
Theodore Karasik, senior adviser at Gulf State Analytics in Washington DC, agreed, stating that the role of the prime minister is similar in some other Arab countries.
“But Japan’s power structure is unique in itself in terms of structure, function, and outreach in terms of international economic affairs,” he told Arab News.
Overall, GCC nationals in the study were less aware of the political power structure in Japan, with as many GCC nationals identifying the emperor as the final decision-maker on laws as those correctly identifying the prime minister.
“It may sound like a stereotype, but GCC nationals may assume that Japan’s emperor has a final say because of story tales, movies and other means of communicating fiction or non-fictional images,” Karasik said.
“Images of a Japan with an emperor gets into the psyche and perhaps this may explain such thinking. Understanding the drivers for why this perception exists means educating people about Japan’s political structure and concepts surrounding Tokyo’s policy development.”
For Osailan, given the absence of accurate knowledge of Japan’s political institutions, many people in the GCC could be projecting their own political institutions onto Japan’s.
“Many people in GCC countries view monarchs as necessarily having considerable executive prerogatives,” he told Arab News.
“In other Arab countries, even monarchies like Jordan and Morocco, citizens are accustomed to having prime ministers as chief executives.”
Awareness of the powers of the prime minister is lowest in the UAE and Saudi Arabia, with only 35 percent of Saudi and UAE residents selecting the prime minister as the person who decides the laws.
According to Karasik, the reason may lie in the different style of governance found in the Arabian Peninsula as opposed to most other parts of the Middle East, while Osailan found such results surprising given that Saudi Arabia and the UAE are Japan’s largest trading partners in the Arab world.
“Why don’t these strong economic ties translate into greater knowledge of Japanese politics?” he asked.
“One possible answer is that, unlike economic ties with the US and some European countries, which are influenced by domestic political considerations, Saudi and Emirati economic ties with Japan are much less exposed to domestic political dynamics.
“However, one may expect a growing interest in Japan’s domestic politics among citizens of the Gulf, given the strong economic ties and, more recently, the Saudi-Japanese cooperation on Vision 2030.”


North Korea accuses South of another drone incursion

Updated 12 sec ago
Follow

North Korea accuses South of another drone incursion

  • The North Korean military tracked a drone “moving northwards” over the South Korean border county of Ganghwa
  • South Korea said it had no record of the flight

SEOUL: North Korea accused the South on Saturday of flying another spy drone over its territory this month, a claim that Seoul denied.
The North Korean military tracked a drone “moving northwards” over the South Korean border county of Ganghwa in early January before shooting it down near the North Korean city of Kaesong, a spokesperson said in a statement carried by the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).
“Surveillance equipment was installed” on the drone and analysis of the wreckage showed it had stored footage of the North’s “important targets” including border areas, the spokesperson said.
Photos of the alleged drone released by KCNA showed the wreckage of a winged craft lying on the ground next to a collection of grey and blue components it said included cameras.
South Korea said it had no record of the flight, and Defense Minister Ahn Gyu-back said the drone in the photos was “not a model operated by our military.”
The office of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said a national security meeting would be held on Saturday to discuss the matter.
Lee had ordered a “swift and rigorous investigation” by a joint military-police investigative team, his office said in a later statement.
On the possibility that civilians operated the drone, Lee said: “if true, it is a serious crime that threatens peace on the Korean Peninsula and national security.”
Located northwest of Seoul, Ganghwa County is one of the closest South Korean territories to North Korea.
KCNA also released aerial images of Kaesong that it said were taken by the drone.
They were “clear evidence” that the aircraft had “intruded into (our) airspace for the purpose of surveillance and reconnaissance,” Pyongyang’s military spokesperson said.
They added that the incursion was similar to one in September when the South flew drones near its border city of Paju.
Seoul would be forced to “pay a dear price for their unpardonable hysteria” if such flights continued, the spokesperson said.
South Korea is already investigating alleged drone flights over the North in late 2024 ordered by then-President Yoon Suk Yeol. Seoul’s military has not confirmed those flights.
Prosecutors have indicted Yoon on charges that he acted illegally in ordering them, hoping to provoke a response from Pyongyang and use it as a pretext for his short-lived bid to impose martial law.

- Cheap, commercial drone -

Flight-path data showed the latest drone was flying in square patterns over Kaesong before it was shot down, KCNA said.
But experts said the cheap, commercially available model was unlikely to have come from Seoul’s armed forces.
“The South Korean military already has drones capable of transmitting high-resolution live feeds,” said Hong Min, an analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification.
“Using an outdated drone that requires physical retrieval of a memory card, simply to film factory rooftops clearly visible on satellite imagery, does not hold up from a military planning perspective.”