More than 80 troops dead as Taliban step up attacks in Afghanistan

Taliban claimed the attack in Sangin district. (AFP/File)
Updated 25 March 2019
Follow

More than 80 troops dead as Taliban step up attacks in Afghanistan

  • More than 80 army and police personnel have died since Saturday
  • Khalilzad has been urging the Taliban to declare a cease-fire

KABUL: Scores of Afghan troops have died in Taliban attacks, officials said Monday, even as peace talks continue to resolve the decades-old conflict.

Violence in the south concentrated on the Sangin and Marjah districts of Helmand province, where more than 80 army and police personnel have died since Saturday, lawmakers from the province told Arab News.

There have been devastating attacks this month in Afghanistan, with the Taliban targeting celebrations and festivals as well as military and law enforcement personnel.

“Unfortunately, the troop losses are huge. Some say over 80 have died,” MP Nimat Ghafari from Helmand told Arab News. “The Taliban want to show their presence and strength by increasing their attacks.”

Senator Hashim Alokozai said 65 troops died on Saturday in Sangin, while another 17 were killed in Marjah.

Omar Zwak, a spokesman for Helmand’s governor, said the Taliban had mostly attacked government troops stationed at outposts. He said the militants could not seize any territory and that they too had suffered “huge” casualties, mostly in drone air strikes.

He could not give an exact death toll, but told Arab News that “dozens of security forces were martyred.”

A defense ministry spokesman in Kabul refused to comment about the Taliban attacks and reported casualties, the highest for months in a single province.

Ghafari said fighting continued on Monday in parts of Sangin, with the government relying on drones to hit Taliban sites as it was tough to dispatch troops on the ground.

Earlier this month Washington’s special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad and the Taliban held peace talks in Qatar, with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani’s government sidelined from the sessions at the militants’ behest. 

Khalilzad has been urging the Taliban to declare a cease-fire, something the insurgents are refusing to do.

With winter gone, the Taliban has also increased its attacks in the northern and northwestern provinces, residents said. Spring is the traditional fighting season for the insurgents.

The focus of the attacks has been the Qaisar district of Faryab province in the country’s northwest. Lawmakers from the province said several thousand families have been forced to leave their homes because of Taliban strikes and the intensification of fighting.

“Families have ended up in mosques, schools or rented houses. They live on scanty aid from the government and people,” MP Fatehullah Qaisari told Arab News.

Analyst Fazl Rahman Orya said the rise of Taliban attacks, and the increase of troop casualties, showed the government lacked the management and military capability for deploying troops and protecting them.

“The Taliban has not announced its spring offensive while the government has launched its offensive, named Khalid, but still the Taliban have the upper hand militarily,” he told Arab News. “Whoever has the upper hand in the war front will be able to speak from a position of strength and can impose its conditions on the other side easily.”

Also on Monday, the UN confirmed that 13 civilians had died in US air strikes in northern Kunduz province.

“The mission expresses serious concern that initial fact-finding indicates that 10 of those killed were children, part of the same extended family whom were displaced by fighting elsewhere in the country,” it said in a statement.


Trump cuts India tariffs as Modi ‘agrees’ to stop buying Russian oil

Updated 32 min 24 sec ago
Follow

Trump cuts India tariffs as Modi ‘agrees’ to stop buying Russian oil

  • US will impose an 18 percent tariff on Indian goods, down from the earlier 50 percent punitive levy
  • Withdrawal from Russian oil may affect India’s relations with BRICS, expert says

NEW DELHI: The US and India have announced reaching a trade agreement after months of friction, with President Donald Trump saying that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had “agreed” to halt purchases of Russian oil.

In August, Trump accused India, which imports most of its crude oil, of funding Moscow’s war in Ukraine and subjected it to a combined tariff rate of about 50 percent on most of the exports.

Following a call with Modi on Monday, Trump took to social media to say that he would cut with immediate effect US levies on Indian goods to 18 percent after Modi “agreed to stop buying Russian Oil, and to buy much more from the United States and, potentially, Venezuela.”

At the same time, India, Trump wrote, would “reduce their Tariffs and Non Tariff Barriers against the United States, to ZERO,” committing to buy “over $500 BILLION DOLLARS of US Energy, Technology, Agricultural, Coal, and many other products.”

Modi confirmed the agreement on social media, saying: “Made in India products will now have a reduced tariff of 18 percent,” without commenting on Russian oil or duty-free imports of American goods.

When the US announced its punitive tariffs last year, India quickly moved forward with free trade negotiations with other countries — signing a deal with Oman and finalizing negotiations with New Zealand and the EU.

While the agreements were expected to partially offset the loss of exports to the US, economists did not expect they would immediately mitigate it, as shifting supply chains takes time.

The newly announced agreement with the US will therefore offer short-term relief for Indian exporters — especially of textiles, gems, jewelry and marine products — who were facing the threat of a market exit.

“In that case, the trade deal with the US is a welcome step. It provides short-term relief, allowing India to continue exporting to the US without being forced to exit the US market and diversify with a huge transition cost,” said Anisree Suresh, geoeconomics researcher at the Takshashila Institution.

“However, one shouldn’t look at it as a comprehensive long-term trade deal like the one India signed with the EU. The unpredictability of the Trump administration remains a major concern, regardless of whether there is a trade deal with the US ... India cannot treat this deal the same as other FTAs, as it is limited in scope and subject to reversal.”

When the US imposed its punitive tariffs on India, about 66 percent of total Indian exports were subject to that rate. Overall, India recorded a negative margin of 19.5 percent, meaning its exports were taxed more heavily than those of its competitors.

“From that point of view, Indian goods will have a larger market over there. However, there’s a problem when we talk about a 0 percent tariff on the US,” said Prof. Arun Kumar, a development economist.

“The US will be able to export a lot more to India, and therefore it will affect our production within the economy. And that will be a setback, so while exports may rise, the internal economy may actually suffer because of this decrease in tariffs on American goods. And especially if it affects agriculture.”

The sudden withdrawal from India’s partnership with Russia may not have a serious economic impact but politically could affect New Delhi’s relations, also with other countries, especially those from BRICS — a grouping that besides India and Russia includes also Brazil and China, and is the most powerful geopolitical forum outside of the Western world.

“You can always substitute Russian oil with some other oil, but I think it’s more of a strategic question, because India and Russia have had long-standing relationships, and if we bend to US pressure and reduce purchases from Russia, then it will affect in future also our relationship with Russia, because we will not be seen as a stable ally,” Kumar said.

“BRICS nations will not trust India very much in the future ... and that’s what Trump wants. He wants to disrupt BRICS. That’s what he has been doing right since the beginning to divide nations and deal with them individually.”