Wave of Iranian asylum seekers puts UK on alert

A baby is taken to the vessel of the Spanish Proactiva Open Arms, after being rescued in the Central Mediterranean Sea, 72 km from Al-Khums, Libya. (AP)
Updated 03 January 2019
Follow

Wave of Iranian asylum seekers puts UK on alert

LONDON, PARIS: A British navy ship was preparing on Thursday to patrol the Channel in response to a wave of mostly Iranian asylum seekers risking the crossing from France in dinghies.

An Iranian and a British national have been arrested on suspicion of facilitating illegal migration across the Channel, the world’s busiest shipping lane.

Attempts to get to Britain aboard small craft have surged in the last three months, with numbers spiking over the Christmas holidays.

The offshore patrol vessel HMS Mersey — currently in the Channel port of Portsmouth — was “available and ready” to be deployed, a Ministry of Defense source told the domestic Press Association news agency.

A Defense Ministry spokesman told AFP: “Our armed forces stand ready to provide additional capacity and expertise to assist the Home Office with the response to migrant crossings.

“Royal Navy ships continue to conduct patrols to protect the integrity of UK territorial waters.”

Some 539 people crossed the Strait of Dover — the Channel’s narrowest part at 33 km wide — in 2018. Eighty percent made the journey in the last three months, said Home Secretary Sajid Javid, the interior minister.

Almost all those who have made it to Britain have requested asylum, Javid said Wednesday, but he questioned whether someone who had left the safety of France could be a “genuine asylum seeker.”

He immediately faced a barrage of criticism from opposition MPs.

Javid said any migrants picked up in British waters would be taken to a UK port.

Meanwhile a 33-year-old Iranian national and a 24-year-old British man were arrested in Manchester, northwest England, on Wednesday “on suspicion of arranging the illegal movement of migrants across the English Channel into the UK,” a National Crime Agency spokeswoman said.

The investigation is ongoing.

Britain is redeploying two Border Force cutters from the Mediterranean in response to the situation.

The Sunday Times newspaper, reporting from a migrant camp on the French coast, said a growing number of well-educated Iranians were attempting the Channel crossing. It cited Ali, 34, a car salesman from Tehran, as saying his journey from the Iranian capital to Britain would end up costing £15,000 ($18,900), with payments in stages to a Kurd-dominated people-smuggling gang.

Migrant report

The number of migrants who died or went missing attempting to cross the Mediterranean fell by more than a quarter in 2018 over the previous year, to 2,262, the UN refugee agency said Thursday.

The number of migrants who arrived in Europe after surviving the sea crossing also dropped by roughly the same proportion last year to 113,482 after 172,301 in 2017, according to the UNHCR’s full-year figures.

A total of 3,139 were reported dead or missing in 2017.

“The Mediterranean has been for years the most deadly sea crossing in the world for refugees and migrants,” UNHCR spokeswoman Celine Schmitt told AFP in Paris.

The data also confirmed that Spain had become the main gateway into Europe for migrants and refugees who travel from north Africa, with 55,756 people registered as arriving there by sea in 2018.

Italy, under its hard-line anti-immigration government, cut the number of arrivals dramatically last year to 23,371 — around a fifth of the number who arrived in 2017 when 119,369 crossed from Libya.

All of the figures are far down from their peak in 2015 when an estimated 1 million people crossed the Mediterranean to Europe, mostly from Turkey into Greece.

The effects of that influx continue to reverberate around the continent, sparking debate about immigration policies and fueling far-right parties in countries that have welcomed large numbers of refugees, such as Italy, Germany and Sweden.

Rescue boats carrying migrants also sparked repeated flareups among European countries in 2018 after Italy’s populist government closed its ports to charity-run ships which pick up stranded migrants.

The EU has been working with north African countries, particularly conflict-wracked Libya, by offering aid money and help with border patrols in a bid to stem the flow of people.

The EU has also financed border protection and development projects in other impoverished African states that are a source of migrants or serve as transit routes.

The largest group of migrants who arrived in Europe in 2018 came from the west African state of Guinea (13,068) followed by Morocco (12,745) and Mali (10,327).

Syrians were the fourth biggest group (9,839), followed by Afghans (7,621) and Iraqis (7,333).


German court rules spy service may not label AfD ‘extremist’ for now

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

German court rules spy service may not label AfD ‘extremist’ for now

  • The court found that there were indeed efforts to undermine Germany’s free democratic order from within the AfD
  • Alice Weidel, the party’s co-leader, hailed the ruling as “a major victory not only for the AfD but also for democracy”

BERLIN: A German court ruled on Thursday that the domestic intelligence agency cannot label the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a “confirmed right-wing extremist” group, at least for now.
The AfD had challenged the designation, which would empower the spy agency to use broader surveillance powers to monitor it and would embolden political opponents seeking a ban of the anti-immigration party.
The Cologne administrative court’s decision puts the designation on hold pending the final outcome of a legal battle between the AfD and Germany’s intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).
The court found that there were indeed efforts to undermine Germany’s free democratic order from within the AfD, highlighting its demands to ban Muslim minarets, public calls to prayer and headscarves in public institutions.
But it ruled that the party as a whole was not “shaped by these efforts” such that “an anti-constitutional tendency can be established” to characterise the party in its entirety as extremist.
Alice Weidel, the party’s co-leader, hailed the ruling as “a major victory not only for the AfD but also for democracy and the rule of law” in a post on X.
The decision had also “thrown a spanner in the works” for the “fanatics” seeking to outlaw the AfD, she added.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, a conservative, noted that the court decision still found reason to suspect the AfD of working “against the free democratic order” and “pursuing anti-constitutional aims.”
The party will continue to be monitored as a “suspected” extremist group, he added.

- Politically isolated -

The AfD was founded in 2013 primarily as a euroskeptic party, but has since become more hard-line nationalist, putting an anti-immigrant stance at the heart of its appeals to voters.
The party surged to become the largest opposition force in last year’s nationwide election, winning nearly 21 percent of the vote.
The AfD is particularly strong in the formerly communist East Germany, holding commanding leads in the polls ahead of several key state-level elections there later this year.
But it remains frozen out of power across the country, as all other political parties have maintained a “firewall” against it and refused to consider cooperating.
Many in mainstream German politics see the AfD’s far-right positions and rhetoric as taboo, a view informed in part by Germany’s dark Nazi history.
The intelligence agency moved to officially classify the national AfD party as a “confirmed extremist” organization on May 2 of last year, a step up from its previous designation as a “suspected” case.
The party filed a lawsuit against the move and the BfV agreed to suspend the classification until a court ruling on the matter is issued.
Several regional AfD party organizations have already been designated as “confirmed extremist” groups.

- Calls to ban -

Thursday’s decision by the Cologne court, which can still be appealed, keeps it on hold until a verdict is reached in the AfD’s broader challenge to the classification.
Some of the AfD’s political foes have advocated banning the party — a process for which there are high legal hurdles in Germany.
It would require, for example, evidence that a party is actively trying to abolish the democratic order and has the means to do so.
Dobrindt and a number of other conservatives have criticized such a move, arguing instead that the AfD must be defeated at the ballot box.
On Thursday, Dobrindt said the court decision only underscored how high the legal hurdles for action against a political party is.
“I have repeatedly said if we want the AfD to go away it should be by governing competently and not by banning them,” Dobrindt said.