Iraq Election’s results tests Iran influence in Baghdad

File photo showing Iraqi Shiite cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr on his way to cast his vote at a polling station during the parliamentary election in Najaf, Iraq, May 12, 2018. (Reuters)
Updated 15 May 2018
Follow

Iraq Election’s results tests Iran influence in Baghdad

Baghdad: Already pressured by the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal, Iran faces a major test in managing Shiite cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr, an opponent who beat Tehran’s longtime allies to achieve a shock victory in Iraq’s parliamentary election.

But If Tehran overplays its hand by squeezing Sadr out of a coalition government dominated by its allies, it risks losing influence by provoking conflict between Iranian-backed Shiites and those loyal to Sadr.

Populist Sadr all but won Iraq’s parliamentary election by tapping into growing public resentment directed at Iran after what some voters say is a corrupt political elite that has failed to help the poor.

Al-Sadr block struck an alliance with the communist party and some civil Iraqi movements who joined forces in the last few years to protest corruption and lack of security in Iraq. Once the results were announced hundreds of Sadr supporters gathered and chanted slogans against corruption of Iraq’s political elite and Iran’s influence in the country.

But Iran is unlikely to relinquish influence in Iraq, its most important ally in the Middle East, and will push for a coalition that will preserve its interests.

For his part, Sadr has made clear he is unwilling to compromise with Iran by forming a coalition with its main allies, Hadi Al-Amiri, leader of the Badr militia groups, and former prime minister Nuri Al-Maliki.
After the election results were announced, he said he would only cooperate with Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi, with the Kurds and the Sunnis.

IRAQI POLITICS
Iran has manipulated Iraqi politics in its favor in the past, notably following the 2003 US-led invasion that overthrew its enemy, Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein.
In the 2010 election, Vice President Ayad Allawi’s group won the largest number of seats, albeit with a narrow margin, but he was prevented from becoming prime minister. He blamed Tehran, for maneuvering Al-Maliki into power.


‘Not your war’: Omani FM on US and Israel undermining ‘active and serious negotiations’

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

‘Not your war’: Omani FM on US and Israel undermining ‘active and serious negotiations’

  • On Friday, Albusaidi appeared on US news show “Face The Nation” and said a peace deal between Iran and the US was “within our reach”

LONDON: Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi, who was leading indirect negotiations between Iran and the US in Geneva this week, tweeted his dismay at the attacks on Tehran this morning by the US and Israel.

“I am dismayed. Active and serious negotiations have yet again been undermined. Neither the interests of the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this,” Albusaidi wrote. “And I pray for the innocents who will suffer. I urge the United States not to get sucked in further. This is not your war.”

On Friday, Albusaidi appeared on US news show “Face The Nation” and said a peace deal between Iran and the US was “within our reach.” He also said, “I don’t think any alternative to diplomacy is going to solve this problem.”

An agreement to irreversibly halt nuclear stockpiling and enrichment was reached, according to Abdusaidi — a feat never before achieved, and one of US President Donald Trump’s most important demands.

“Iran will never, ever have a nuclear material that will create a bomb. This is, I think, a big achievement. This is something that is not in the old deal that was negotiated during President Obama’s time,” the foreign minister said.

“They will not be able to actually accumulate the material that would enable them to create a bomb … So there would be zero accumulation, zero stockpiling and full verification.”

Early on Saturday, the US and Israel launched coordinated military strikes against multiple targets inside Iran, marking a dramatic escalation in Middle East tensions. The operation — described by US officials as “major combat operations” — involved air and missile strikes on key Iranian military and government infrastructure, including areas in and around Tehran.

Trump framed the action as an effort to degrade Iran’s missile and nuclear capabilities and to remove what he described as “an imminent threat” to regional and global security.