Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. leads charge against Facebook, Google in Australia probe

News Corp, the Australia’s main newspaper group, led the charge in arguing that Facebook and Google’s dominance of digital advertising significantly undermined the news industry. (AFP)
Updated 03 May 2018
Follow

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. leads charge against Facebook, Google in Australia probe

  • Murdoch and other executives from the company have long led calls for Facebook and Google to “level the playing field” and pay news companies for their content
  • Facebook opposed calls for tighter regulation, saying the rapidly changing digital landscape made the platforms “a challenging subject for regulatory intervention”

SYDNEY: Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation accused Facebook and Google of “anti-competitive practices” in one of dozens of submissions to a probe of the tech giants released Thursday by Australia’s competition watchdog.
A total of 57 media companies, advertisers and journalist groups put forward their cases for changes in the operations of the Internet titans, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) reported.
News Corp, the country’s main newspaper group, its main competitor Fairfax Media and commercial broadcasters led the charge in arguing that Facebook and Google’s dominance of digital advertising significantly undermined the news industry.
“A number of digital platforms possess substantial market power and are engaging in anti-competitive practices that prevent publishers such as News Corp. Australia from competing on the merits,” the company said in a 144-page submission.
“These practices have the potential to profoundly damage the creation, distribution and consumption of news and journalism in Australia.”
Murdoch and other executives from the company, which also owns The Wall Street Journal and the Times of London, have long led calls for Facebook and Google to “level the playing field” and pay news companies for their content.
But The Australian newspaper said the ACCC submission, by alleging market abuses by the two companies, “represents a dramatic escalation of hostilities.”
The group stopped short of demanding regulation of Facebook and Google, saying “current laws may be sufficient to deal with our concerns.”
“However, it may also be the case that some further legislative, regulatory and/or policy intervention or changes are required.”
Fairfax complained that its main mastheads had seen their advertising revenue fall from A$800 million ($600 million) in 1999 to just A$225 million ($169m) in 2017 as Google and Facebook gobbled up digital advertising dollars. As a result, the group has shed hundreds of jobs.
But it also stopped short of demanding new regulations, saying this should be “a last resort,” and argued instead for the digital platforms to work collaboratively on solutions for the news media.
Distancing itself from News Corp, Fairfax also opposed making platforms pay for news content, saying this would be “impractical” and post risks for editorial independence.
Australia’s main television broadcasters — Seven, Nine and Ten — demanded some combination of revenue sharing and tighter regulation of the tech companies’ advertising activities.
“The ACCC must intervene to ensure that the competition for advertising revenue is occurring in a fair and effective manner,” said the Ten Network, recently purchased by US broadcaster CBS.
In its own submission to the ACCC made public last month, Facebook opposed calls for tighter regulation, saying the rapidly changing digital landscape made the platforms “a challenging subject for regulatory intervention.”
“Consumers often have the most to gain from market disruptions caused by technological change and the most to lose from interventions that are designed to protect particular business models from the effects of those changes,” it said.
Google added in its submission that “changes in consumer and marketing behavior have profound implications for traditional news business models. But they do not mean the death of journalism.”
The competition commission is expected to publish a preliminary report in December, and a final report next year.


Israel extends foreign media ban law until end of 2027

Updated 23 December 2025
Follow

Israel extends foreign media ban law until end of 2027

  • Order replaces temporary emergency legislation that allowed authorization of so-called ‘Al Jazeera bill’
  • Extension of temporary order empowers Communications Ministry to restrict foreign channels deemed to cause ‘real harm to state security’

LONDON: Israel’s Knesset approved late Monday an extension of the temporary order empowering the Communications Ministry to shut down foreign media outlets, pushing the measure through until Dec. 31, 2027.

The bill, proposed by Likud lawmaker Ariel Kallner, passed its second and third readings by a 22-10 vote, replacing wartime emergency legislation known as the “Al Jazeera Law.”

Under the extended order, the communications minister — with prime ministerial approval and security cabinet or government ratification — can restrict foreign channels deemed to cause “real harm to state security,” even outside states of emergency.

Measures include suspending broadcasts, closing offices, seizing equipment, blocking websites, and directing the defense minister to block satellite signals, including in the West Bank, without disrupting other channels.

Administrative orders last 90 days, with possible extensions. Unlike the temporary measure, the new law does not require court approval to shut down a media outlet.

The move has drawn sharp criticism from human rights and media groups, who warn it entrenches restrictions on Arab and foreign outlets amid a broader erosion of press freedoms.

“Israel is openly waging a battle against media outlets, both local and foreign, that criticize the government’s narrative; that is typical behavior of authoritarian regimes,” International Federation of Journalists General Secretary Anthony Bellanger said in November after the bill’s first reading.

“We are deeply concerned about the Israeli parliament passing this controversial bill, as it would be a serious blow to free speech and media freedom, and a direct attack on the public’s right to know.”

In a parallel development, the Israeli Cabinet unanimously approved on Monday the shutdown of Army Radio (Galei Tzahal) after 75 years, with operations ceasing on March 1, 2026.

In a statement, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara warned the decision “undermines public broadcasting in Israel and restricts freedom of expression,” lacking a legal basis.