Pakistani Taleban pick new No. 2 after drone strike

Updated 03 June 2013
Follow

Pakistani Taleban pick new No. 2 after drone strike

DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan: Pakistani Taleban fighters have chosen a new deputy commander to replace their previous second-in-command who was killed in a US drone strike in the North Waziristan region, sources in the group said yesterday.
The previous deputy commander, Wali-ur-Rehman, was killed in an attack by a missile-firing US drone aircraft in the militant stronghold of North Waziristan, on northwest Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan, on Wednesday, Pakistani security officials and militants said.
A Pakistani Taleban committee met late on Wednesday to chose a new deputy after Wali-ur-Rehman was buried in a low-key ceremony, three Taleban members told Reuters.
The Taleban members said the new number two, Khan Said, 38, had served as Rehman’s deputy. He was involved in planning a 2011 attack on a Pakistani navy base in Karachi in which 18 people were killed and a 2012 jail break in which nearly 400 militant inmates escaped, they said.
“There was absolute consensus over Khan Said,” one Pakistani Taleban member said.
Wednesday’s drone strike, that killed six other people, was the first in Pakistan since a May 11 general election in which strikes by the unmanned US aircraft was a major issue. It was also the first reported US drone strike since President Barack Obama announced last week that the United States was scaling back the drone program.
The Pakistani Taleban are a separate entity to the Afghan Taleban, though allied with them. Known as the Tehreek-e-Taleban Pakistan, they have launched devastating attacks against the Pakistani military and civilians.
Wali-ur-Rehman had been tipped to succeed Hakimullah Mehsud as leader of the Pakistan Taleban and had been viewed as someone less hostile to the Pakistani military than some other top operatives.
While his death is a major blow for the group, it could be also viewed as a setback for incoming Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s efforts to end violence.
He criticized drone strikes during the election campaign, describing them at one point as a “challenge” to Pakistan’s sovereignty. Sharif also offered to hold talks with the group, something that now looked less likely, according to one senior security official.
“Wali-ur-Rehman was a serious and mature man, his death could hurt prospects for an expected peace initiative considered by the new government,” the official told Reuters.
However, many observers said any meaningful settlement with the Taleban was unlikely in any case given Sharif’s condition that the starting point for talks be respect for the country’s democratic order and institutions.

The White House did not confirm the killing, in line with its practice not to discuss drone strikes.
But its spokesman Jay Carney said Wali-ur-Rehman “has participated in cross-border attacks in Afghanistan against US and NATO personnel and horrific attacks against Pakistani civilians and soldiers.”
Drones armed with missiles have carried out numerous strikes in the North Waziristan Pashtun tribal region over the past seven years, sometimes with heavy civilian casualties.
A US drone killed Pakistani Taleban commander Baitullah Mehsud in 2009. There had been several reports that his successor, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed the same way but they turned out to be false.
North Waziristan has long been a stronghold of militants including Afghan Taleban and their Al-Qaeda and Pakistani Taleban allies.


Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

  • Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state was inadmissible
  • “We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world,” Edling said

STOCKHOLM: A group of climate activists said Friday they were filing another lawsuit against the Swedish state for alleged climate inaction, after the Supreme Court threw out their case last year.
The group behind the lawsuit, Aurora, first tried to sue the Swedish state in late 2022.
Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state — brought by an individual, with 300 other people joining it as a class action lawsuit — was inadmissible.
The court at the time noted the “very high requirements for individuals to have the right to bring such a claim” against a state.
“We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world. But this requires that rich countries that emit as much as Sweden stop breaking the law,” Aurora spokesperson Ida Edling said in a statement Friday.
The group, which said the lawsuit had been filed with the Stockholm District Court Friday, said it believes the Swedish state is obligated “to reduce Sweden’s emissions as much and as quickly as necessary in order for the country to be in line with its fair share.”
“This means that emissions from several sectors must reach zero before 2030,” the group said, while noting this was 15 years before Sweden’s currently set targets.
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency as well as the OECD warned last year that Sweden was at risk of not reaching its own goal of net zero emissions by 2045.
While the first lawsuit was unsuccessful, the group noted that international courts had made several landmark decisions since the first suit was filed, spotlighting two in particular.
In an April 2024 decision, Europe’s top rights court, the European Court of Human Rights, ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, the first country ever to be condemned by an international tribunal for not taking sufficient action to curb global warming.
In 2025, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion stating that countries violating their climate obligations were committing an “unlawful” act.