Bhutan is happy to be one of smallest nations at Olympic Games

Updated 06 August 2012
Follow

Bhutan is happy to be one of smallest nations at Olympic Games

LONDON: Ask archer Sherab Zam from the remote Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan about the highlight of her Olympic experience and she has no doubts — meeting the queen.
Sherab was in the dining room of the athletes’ village in Olympic Park when Queen Elizabeth popped by, unannounced.
Her one team mate, shooter Kunzang Choden, was not there to share the moment as she was competing for Bhutan, one of 11 countries from 204 nations at the 2012 Olympics with just two athletes in their teams.
“I could not believe my eyes. The queen! I could never have dreamt this could happen to me,” Sherab, 28, told Reuters. “She was so cute, waving at us. My family will be amazed.”
Sherab will have to wait until she gets home to share the experience with her mother who brought her up single-handed. Her mother lives on farm in Kashithang in rural Bhutan without Internet access and erratic telecommunications.
Until then Sherab and her team mate are relishing being at London.
They entered on wild cards that are given to encourage developing countries at the Olympics and uphold the Olympic spirit that participation is more important than winning.
Bhutan has one of the smallest teams at London. The other 10 with only two athletes are East Timor, Sao Tome and Principe, Equatorial Guinea, Mauritania, Gambia, Dominica, Sierra Leone, the British Virgin Islands, Somalia, and Nauru.

YES, THE HAPPY COUNTRY
Sherab and Kunzang have got used to explaining several times a day that Bhutan is a mountainous country wedged between India and China with 700,000 people, and, yes, it is the country with a happiness index used to measure its success.
The impoverished, largely Buddhist country is also known for only opening up to foreigners in 1974 and banning television and Internet access until 1999 amid concern that exposure to the Western world would erode its traditional lifestyle and values.
“We are a small country but a happy one, and one of the smallest at the Olympics. Lots of people know nothing about us and have to look us up on a map,” said Sherab with her trademark smile.
A Reuters analysis found that Bhutan — where archery is the national sport — is one of 82 nations that have never won a medal at any Olympics. Many of these countries have a history of war or poverty and have spent little on sport.
Bhutan, a country about the size of Switzerland, has competed eight times at the Olympics, always on wild card entries and always in archery. This was the first time it had a shooter competing.
London did not end the medal drought for Bhutan. Sherab came 61st out of 64 in the women’s individual archery. Kunzang came 56th out of 56 in the women’s 10 meter air rifle.
Both knew they stood little chance against rivals from well-funded nations with state-of-the-art equipment but they were pleased with their performances and for the chance to participate.
“I am not that good at archery but I love it. It was so good to meet world ranking archers who are famous and to watch how they do it. I have learnt a lot from them,” said Sherab, who has developed a liking for fish and chips since arriving in Britain.
Kunzang, 28, from the Bhutanese capital of Thimphu who is coached by her husband, agreed.
“I really enjoyed it. Now we can see how hard we need to work to be really good,” she said.
Sherab, who took up archery seven years ago, said she hoped that her participation at London would encourage other Bhutanese to aim high, particularly the youth with rising unemployment and discontent in Bhutan.
“When I grew up I never dreamt I would come to London, let alone compete in an Olympics,” said Sherab. “This just shows that anything is possible. The Olympics is great for that.”

 


Salford ‘way more prepared’ for Man City rematch says manager

Updated 13 February 2026
Follow

Salford ‘way more prepared’ for Man City rematch says manager

  • Karl Robinson is adamant Salford will be a better side when they return to the scene of last season’s 8-0 defeat by Manchester City
LONDON: Karl Robinson is adamant Salford will be a better side when they return to the scene of last season’s 8-0 defeat by Manchester City.
The fourth-tier club side were thrashed by Pep Guardiola’s men in an FA Cup third-round tie at the Etihad Stadium.
They will now make the same short journey in England’s northwest in the fourth round on Saturday and the Salford manager is confident of a very different game.
“Last year was really emotional,” said Robinson. “It wasn’t too long ago our owners were leaning on iron bars watching non-league football.
“To then walk out at the Etihad in front of 60,000 with their football club was incredible. That’s the journey of all journeys.
“This year we have other things to worry about. We have a different mindset. We’ve learned from last year. We’ll be way more prepared.”
Playing City in the FA Cup was an indication of Salford’s rise through the ranks of English football from non-league level, with their ascent propelled by their takeover by a group of former Manchester United stars from the celebrated ‘Class of 92’.
Salford are now in their seventh successive campaign in League Two, with the ownership changing last year as a new consortium fronted by Gary Neville and David Beckham bought out their former Old Trafford teammates.
Forging their own identity in the shadow of some of England’s leading clubs is an issue for Salford, who will revert to their traditional orange kit after the ‘Class of 92’ brought in a red and white strip.
“Salford is a proper football club and that’s our message going into this game,” said Robinson.
“Last year we wore the red kit but we’ll wear our away kit this year, just to signify it’s a new era. We do sit separate to City and United. We have our own identity.
“We’re a completely different football club now.”
For all Robinson’s renewed optimism, City thrashed League One Exeter 10-1 in the last round of the FA Cup.
But he insisted: “There’s always hope, there’s always a possibility. You don’t know 100 percent. You might know the odds are 99.9 percent against, but there’s still that chance.
“Everyone goes to bed the night before with that thought of ‘what if?’, and that’s exciting.”