SYDNEY: Australia said on Friday it had offered compensation to Save the Children staff after “regretting” relying on allegations the charity had encouraged asylum-seekers held on the Pacific island of Nauru to harm themselves.
Save the Children welcomed the confidential financial settlement, but said it still had concerns about those living on Nauru, where two refugees set themselves on fire this week.
One of them died, while the second was in a critical condition in hospital in Australia.
“We’ve always believed Nauru is a ticking time bomb and you can’t leave people stranded on a tiny tropical island for three years, remove all hope and expect that they will be OK,” the charity’s policy director Mat Tinkler told AFP.
Australia sends asylum-seekers arriving by boat to Nauru or Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island. They are denied resettlement in Australia even if they are genuine refugees and are returned to their home countries if they wish.
The compensation relates to an incident in October 2014 when 10 Save the Children workers were stopped from working at the detention center on Nauru. Nine were subsequently deported.
At the time, the immigration department cited allegations that Save the Children’s staff had “orchestrated protest activity, coached and encouraged self-harm of detainees” to cast doubt on Australia’s tough immigration policy.
Two independent reviews into the allegations were critical of the government’s decision to have the charity’s staff removed from Nauru.
The department on Friday acknowledged that monetary compensation would not make up for the damage the allegations had made to the British-founded charity’s reputation.
The department said it “regrets the way in which... the allegations relied on by the department... may have led other NGOs and members of the public to question the integrity of SCA (Save the Children Australia) as a provider of government services or, to the extent that it may be relevant, as a child rights organization.”
Australia compensates aid group after Nauru claims
Australia compensates aid group after Nauru claims
Chancellor Merz: Germany does not need same fighter jets as France
- The Future Combat Aircraft System program was launched in 2017
- Scheme intended to replace France’s Rafale jet and the Eurofighter planes used by Germany and Spain by 2040
BERLIN: Germany does not need the same fighter jets as France, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in an interview broadcast Wednesday, signaling that Berlin could abandon a flagship joint defense project.
“The French need, in the next generation of fighter jets, an aircraft capable of carrying nuclear weapons and operating from an aircraft carrier. That’s not what we currently need in the German military,” Merz said on the German podcast Machtwechsel.
The Future Combat Aircraft System (FCAS) program was launched in 2017 to replace France’s Rafale jet and the Eurofighter planes used by Germany and Spain by 2040.
But the scheme, jointly developed by the three countries, stalled last year as France’s Dassault Aviation got into heated disputes with Airbus, which represents German and Spanish interests in the project.
The project has also fallen foul of wider Franco-German disagreements, with Berlin accusing Paris of not making enough effort to boost defense spending.
Merz had previously pledged a decision on FCAS by the end of last year but has postponed making the final call.
France has continued to insist the project is viable.
Merz said on the podcast that France and Germany were now “at odds over the specifications and profiles” of the kind of aircraft they needed.
“The question now is: do we have the strength and the will to build two aircraft for these two different requirement profiles, or only one?” he asked.
If this issue is not resolved, he said Germany would “not be able to continue the project,” adding that there were “other countries in Europe” ready to work with Berlin.
“The French need, in the next generation of fighter jets, an aircraft capable of carrying nuclear weapons and operating from an aircraft carrier. That’s not what we currently need in the German military,” Merz said on the German podcast Machtwechsel.
The Future Combat Aircraft System (FCAS) program was launched in 2017 to replace France’s Rafale jet and the Eurofighter planes used by Germany and Spain by 2040.
But the scheme, jointly developed by the three countries, stalled last year as France’s Dassault Aviation got into heated disputes with Airbus, which represents German and Spanish interests in the project.
The project has also fallen foul of wider Franco-German disagreements, with Berlin accusing Paris of not making enough effort to boost defense spending.
Merz had previously pledged a decision on FCAS by the end of last year but has postponed making the final call.
France has continued to insist the project is viable.
Merz said on the podcast that France and Germany were now “at odds over the specifications and profiles” of the kind of aircraft they needed.
“The question now is: do we have the strength and the will to build two aircraft for these two different requirement profiles, or only one?” he asked.
If this issue is not resolved, he said Germany would “not be able to continue the project,” adding that there were “other countries in Europe” ready to work with Berlin.
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.









