Pakistan rules out joining Abraham Accords, opposes use of force against Iran

Pakistan’s Foreign Office Spokesperson Tahir Andrabi speaks during a weekly press briefing at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Islamabad on January 29, 2026. (Screengrab/MOFA)
Short Url
Updated 29 January 2026
Follow

Pakistan rules out joining Abraham Accords, opposes use of force against Iran

  • Foreign Office says Pakistan’s participation in Gaza Board of Peace unrelated to Israel normalization
  • Spokesman says Pakistan “firmly opposed to interference in internal affairs” of Iran, imposition of sanctions

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Thursday said it will not join the Abraham Accords, the US-brokered normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states, rejecting any suggestion that its recent joining of the Gaza Board of Peace signaled a change in its longstanding position on Israel.

The Abraham Accords are a series of US-brokered agreements signed in 2020 that established diplomatic, economic and security ties between Israel and several Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco. By contrast, the Gaza Board of Peace is a diplomatic initiative focused on supporting a ceasefire, humanitarian assistance and post-war reconstruction in Gaza, and does not involve recognition of Israel or security commitments.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif joined the Gaza Board of Peace earlier this month alongside other world leaders, prompting speculation that Islamabad’s involvement could be linked to broader regional normalization efforts. Pakistan does not recognize Israel and has consistently said it will not normalize ties without a just resolution of the Palestinian issue.

“It is a misconception that joining the Board of Peace is in any way connected to any Abraham Accords or any side draft to this issue. Pakistan’s positions remain unchanged and we will not become a party to the Abraham accord,” Foreign Office spokesman Tahir Andrabi told reporters at a weekly briefing. 

He said Pakistan had joined the Gaza Board of Peace “in good faith” and had not committed to any military role, adding that Islamabad had not decided to join the international stabilization force (ISF) for Gaza and that membership of the board did not imply contributing troops.

“Our basic objectives of joining the Board of Peace are three: one is to consolidate and sustain ceasefire, second is to support reconstruction, and third is to advance … a lasting peace based on the Palestinian right to self-determination,” he said.

The spokesman added that Pakistan was part of a broader collective effort, noting that seven other Muslim countries had also joined the initiative.

“Pakistan, joining the Board of Peace should be seen in the continuum of the initiative by eight Muslim countries to promote peace in Gaza, leading toward a lasting solution to the Palestinian question,” he said. 

“All eight countries have joined the Board of Peace with a single collective voice. The Board of Peace offers a viable glimmer of hope for Gaza and for wider Palestinian questions.”

Responding to another question, Andrabi said the peace board initiative did not replace the United Nations.

“We hope that the framework established by the Board of Peace will lead to concrete steps toward permanent ceasefire, expanded humanitarian assistance, and the reconstruction of Plaza, and in advanced Palestinian’s people’s right to self-determination,” he said, adding that Pakistan hoped the process would culminate in “an independent, sovereign, contiguous state of Palestine, based on the pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif, as its capital.”

“Pakistan looks forward to continuing to play a constructive role as part of the Board of Peace in achieving these goals. And ending the suffering of our Palestinian brothers and sisters,” he said.

USE OF FORCE AGAINST IRAN

Asked about reports of possible US military action against Iran and rising regional tensions, Andrabi said Pakistan opposed the use of force and supported diplomacy.

“Pakistan remains firmly opposed to interference in internal affairs of our brotherly country, Iran. We have opposed the use of force. We have opposed the imposition of sanctions and this position continues,” he said.

The comments come as the Middle East faces heightened tensions over Iran’s internal unrest and fraught relations with the United States. 

In recent weeks, widespread demonstrations have swept across major Iranian cities, driven by economic hardship, high inflation and discontent with the government’s handling of domestic issues. Human rights groups say hundreds of people have been killed and thousands arrested in repeated crackdowns on protests, some of the largest in the country since the 1979 revolution, as authorities impose Internet blackouts and other restrictions to suppress dissent.

At the same time, US-Iran tensions have escalated significantly. Washington has deployed a substantial naval presence, including an aircraft carrier strike group, to the region while issuing stern warnings to Tehran over its nuclear ambitions and other activities. 

President Donald Trump and senior US officials have signaled that military force remains an option if Iran does not comply with demands to negotiate, raising fears of wider conflict. Iran has rejected negotiations under pressure and vowed to defend itself if attacked, and regional and global leaders have called for restraint amid the growing risk of confrontation.

Against this backdrop of domestic upheaval and potential international escalation, Andrabi said Islamabad had reiterated its opposition to the use of force and stressed the importance of peace and diplomacy.

He said Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar had twice spoken by phone with his Iranian counterpart in recent days and had also engaged with US officials during the World Economic Forum in Davos last week.

“So, our advocacy for peace, diplomacy continues and this remains our stated position,” the FO spokesman said. “This region cannot afford war, turmoil, and because this, in essence, stops the economic development, peace, and prosperity. So, we hope that peace and diplomacy will prevail.”


Pakistan highlights Gwadar transshipment role as shipping routes face disruption over regional tensions

Updated 05 March 2026
Follow

Pakistan highlights Gwadar transshipment role as shipping routes face disruption over regional tensions

  • Pakistani ports possess “untapped potential” to attract global shipping lines for transshipment operations, says minister
  • Pakistan eyes leveraging Gwadar as regional transshipment hub as Iran’s closure of Strait of Hormuz disrupts global maritime trade

KARACHI: Pakistan’s Maritime Affairs Minister Junaid Anwar Chaudhry on Thursday highlighted the importance of the port city of Gwadar’s transshipment role as major shipping routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, face disruption due to Iran’s ongoing conflict with the US and Israel in the Gulf. 

The meeting takes place as Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway that lies between it and Oman. It is one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes, with roughly 20 percent of global oil supplies passing through it. Iran has vowed it will attack any ship that enters the strait, causing energy prices to rise sharply on Monday amid disruptions to tanker traffic in the waterway.

Gwadar is a deep-sea port in Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province that lies close to the Strait of Hormuz. Pakistani officials have in the past highlighted Gwadar’s geostrategic position as the shortest trade route to the Gulf and Central Asia, stressing that it has the potential to become a regional transshipment hub.

Chaudhry chaired a high-level meeting of government officials to assess emerging logistical challenges facing Pakistan’s trade, particularly in the energy sector, amid tensions in the Gulf. 

“Special focus was placed on fully leveraging the potential of Gwadar Port as a regional transshipment hub and positioning it as an alternative of regional instability,” Pakistan’s maritime affairs ministry said in a statement. 

The minister said Pakistani ports possessed “significant untapped potential” to attract international shipping lines for transshipment operations, noting that it could also ensure long-term sustainability and growth of the country’s maritime sector.

Participants of the meeting discussed measures to strengthen Pakistan’s position as a viable alternative transit and transshipment destination, as key waterways are affected by the disruption. 

The committee also reviewed proposals to amend relevant rules and regulations to facilitate international transshipment operations through on-dock and off-dock terminals.

The chairmen of the Port Qasim Authority, Karachi Port Trust and Gwadar Port Authority attended the meeting, briefing committee members on the current operational readiness of their ports. They spoke about the available capacity for container transshipment, bulk cargo handling and refueling services at Pakistani ports. 

The port in Gwadar is a central part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), under which Beijing has funneled tens of billions of dollars into massive transport, energy and infrastructure projects in Pakistan.

Pakistan has long eyed the deep-sea port as a key asset that can help boost its trade with Central Asian states, the Gulf region and ensure the country earns valuable foreign exchange.