Nearly 5m Catholics join Sinulog, Philippines’ largest religious festival

Filipinos participate in the Sinulog festival in Cebu City, Jan. 18, 2026. (Cebu City Public Information Office)
Short Url
Updated 18 January 2026
Follow

Nearly 5m Catholics join Sinulog, Philippines’ largest religious festival

  • Festival blends Catholic elements with local rituals preceding Spanish colonization
  • It centers around Santo Nino, one of the most venerated images in the Philippines

MANILA: Nearly 5 million people filled the streets of Cebu City with music and dance on Sunday, as they participated in Sinulog, the largest religious festival in the Philippines, commemorating the introduction of Christianity.

Observed on the third Sunday of January, Sinulog marks the 1521 event when Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan gifted a statue of the Santo Nino, the child Jesus, to Rajah Humabon, the native king of Cebu, who became the first local ruler to convert to Christianity.

The original statue is housed in the Basilica Minore del Santo Nino, the country’s oldest Roman Catholic church. It was founded in 1565, shortly after the arrival of the Spaniards and the beginning of Spanish colonization of the Philippines, which also resulted in Catholicism becoming its dominant religion.

Santo Nino has become one of the most venerated images and is present in many churches across the country. Every year, Catholics from across the country visit Cebu City to express their devotion.

On Sunday, 4.7 million of them gathered for the Sinulog parade, according to data from Cebu City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office.




Filipinos participate in the Sinulog festival in Cebu City, Jan. 18, 2026. (Cebu City Public Information Office)

Kristine Magnifica, a recent bar passer, arrived from Iloilo, some 200km from Cebu, to show gratitude for her success.

“Joining the Sinulog is my way of thanking him,” she said. “It’s not purely leisurely because joining these activities entails a lot of patience. And it’s really, really tiring considering that the sun is up and the walk is far.”

Sunday’s festival was the culmination of days of processions and special masses.

“It’s actually an accumulation of activities. You can probably say that the Cebuanos have been very, very busy for the past 10 days attending masses, processions, and activities that were actually conducted by the Basilica del Santo Nino,” Magnifica said.

“Today is the grand festival parade where participants from different municipalities and islands and regions in the country come to Cebu.”

The word “sinulog” comes from the Cebuano word “sulog,” meaning “movement of water,” and refers to the distinctive forward-backward dance steps that mimic the flow of a river.

The dance, which is performed during the festival, dates to pre-colonial times and highlights the region’s maritime culture. Its role in Catholic devotion is a fusion of Filipino culture and Christianity.

“Recent studies show that it’s very similar to the Tausug war dance … It was performed by our ancestors before the coming of the Spaniards,” said Dr. Xiao Chua, public historian and lecturer at De La Salle University.

“They were using it already for rituals, to ask for rain, and they began offering the Sinulog dance to Santo Nino … From a war dance, it became a prayer dance in Cebu.”

The public festival in Cebu City, however, is a relatively recent development. According to Chua, it was due to renewed devotion to Santo Nino around the 400th anniversary of the Christianization of the Philippines in 1965.

The Sinulog festival became a tourist attraction in the early 1980s, when it started to be organized by the local government.

For Chua, the public display of devotion is very much in line with Filipino culture and values such as paki-kipag kapwa-tao — respect, empathy, and concern for others — and bayanihan — community spirit, which are reflected in all large religious events.

“It’s part of the Filipino phenomenon,” he said. “(In) all of those festivals, you’re going to see that people want to worship together.”


House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

WASHINGTON: The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership.
The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and drew instant recrimination from Trump himself. The resolution seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose the tariffs, though actually undoing the policy would require support from the president, which is highly unlikely. It next goes to the Senate.
Trump believes in the power of tariffs to force US trade partners to the negotiating table. But lawmakers are facing unrest back home from businesses caught in the trade wars and constituents navigating pocketbook issues and high prices.
“Today’s vote is simple, very simple: Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American family or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person — Donald J. Trump?” said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who authored the resolution.
Within minutes, as the gavel struck, Trump fired off a stern warning to those in the Republican Party who would dare to cross him.
“Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!” the president posted on social media.
The high-stakes moment provides a snapshot of the House’s unease with the president’s direction, especially ahead of the midterm elections as economic issues resonate among voters. The Senate has already voted to reject Trump’s tariffs on Canada and other countries in a show of displeasure. But both chambers would have to approve the tariff rollbacks, and send the resolution to Trump for the president’s signature — or veto.
Six House Republicans voted for the resolution, and one Democrat voted against it.
From Canada, Ontario, Premier Doug Ford on social media called the vote “an important victory with more work ahead.” He thanked lawmakers from both parties “who stood up in support of free trade and economic growth between our two great countries. Let’s end the tariffs and together build a more prosperous and secure future.”
Trump recently threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on goods imported from Canada over that country’s proposed China trade deal, intensifying a feud with the longtime US ally and Prime Minister Mark Carney.
GOP defections forced the vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to prevent this showdown.
Johnson insisted lawmakers wait for a pending Supreme Court ruling in a lawsuit about the tariffs. He engineered a complicated rules change to prevent floor action. But Johnson’s strategy collapsed late Tuesday, as Republicans peeled off during a procedural vote to ensure the Democratic measure was able to advance.
“The president’s trade policies have been of great benefit,” Johnson, R-Louisiana, had said. “And I think the sentiment is that we allow a little more runway for this to be worked out between the executive branch and the judicial branch.”
Late Tuesday evening, Johnson could be seen speaking to holdout Republican lawmakers as the GOP leadership team struggled to shore up support during a lengthy procedural vote, but the numbers lined up against him.
“We’re disappointed,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Wednesday morning. “The president will make sure they don’t repeal his tariffs.”
Terminating Trump’s emergency
The resolution put forward by Meeks would terminate the national emergency that Trump declared a year ago as one of his executive orders.
The administration claimed illicit drug flow from Canada constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat that allows the president to slap tariffs on imported goods outside the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, said the flow of fentanyl into the US is a dire national emergency and the policy must be left in place.
“Let’s be clear again about what this resolution is and what it’s not. It’s not a debate about tariffs. You can talk about those, but that’s not really what it is,” Mast said. “This is Democrats trying to ignore that there is a fentanyl crisis.”
Experts say fentanyl produced by cartels in Mexico is largely smuggled into the US from land crossings in California and Arizona. Fentanyl is also made in Canada and smuggled into the US, but to a much lesser extent.
Torn between Trump and tariffs
Ahead of voting, some rank-and-file Republican lawmakers expressed unease over the choices ahead as Democrats — and a few renegade Republicans — impressed on their colleagues the need to flex their power as the legislative branch rather than ceding so much power to the president to take authority over trade and tariff policy.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, said he was unpersuaded by Johnson’s call to wait until the Supreme Court makes its decision about the legality of Trump’s tariffs. He voted for passage.
“Why doesn’t the Congress stand on its own two feet and say that we’re an independent branch?” Bacon said. “We should defend our authorities. I hope the Supreme Court does, but if we don’t do it, shame on us.”
Bacon, who is retiring rather than facing reelection, also argued that tariffs are bad economic policy.
Other Republicans had to swiftly make up their minds after Johnson’s gambit — which would have paused the calendar days to prevent the measure from coming forward — was turned back.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to have to support our president,” said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he doesn’t want to tie the president’s hands on trade and would support the tariffs on Canada “at this time.”