Afghan trade resilient in 2025 as Iran, Central Asia routes offset Pakistan closures

Vehicles loaded with the belongings of Afghan nationals head back to Afghanistan, after Pakistan started to deport documented Afghan refugees, near Torkham border crossing between Pakistan and Afghanistan, September 1, 2025. (Reuters/ File)
Short Url
Updated 06 January 2026
Follow

Afghan trade resilient in 2025 as Iran, Central Asia routes offset Pakistan closures

  • Tensions with Islamabad this year disrupted established transit corridors that connected Afghanistan to seaports for decades
  • Afghan traders ‌moved cargo ‌through Iran’s Chabahar port , expanded ​overland ‌shipments via Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan

KABUL:  Afghanistan’s trade remained resilient in 2025 despite repeated closures of key border crossings with Pakistan, commerce ministry data ​showed, as exporters and importers increasingly relied on alternative routes through Iran and Central Asia.

The stability came even as tensions with Islamabad disrupted established transit corridors that have been landlocked Afghanistan’s main gateway to seaports for decades.

Traders instead ‌moved cargo ‌through Iran’s Chabahar port ‌and expanded ⁠their ​overland ‌shipments via Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, cushioning the impact of delays and political uncertainty.

Total trade — the value of exports and imports combined — rose from the previous year to nearly $13.9 billion in 2025, according to the ⁠commerce ministry. Exports stood at roughly $1.8 billion, broadly ‌steady year on year, ‍while imports increased to ‍just over $12.1 billion.

India, Pakistan and several ‍Central Asian states remained among Afghanistan’s largest export destinations with shipments dominated by dried fruit, coal, carpets, saffron and agricultural produce.

Imports continued to ​be led by fuel, machinery, food staples and industrial inputs, mainly from ⁠Iran, the United Arab Emirates, China and regional neighbors. Afghanistan is accelerating efforts to reduce its reliance on Pakistan in the wake of border closures linked to security disputes.

 While Pakistan remains its fastest route to the sea, Afghan officials say diversifying its trade corridors has enabled commerce to continue even while relations with its eastern neighbor ‌remain strained.


Pakistan rules out joining Abraham Accords, opposes use of force against Iran

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan rules out joining Abraham Accords, opposes use of force against Iran

  • Foreign Office says Pakistan’s participation in Gaza Board of Peace unrelated to Israel normalization
  • Spokesman says Pakistan “firmly opposed to interference in internal affairs” of Iran, imposition of sanctions

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Thursday said it will not join the Abraham Accords, the US-brokered normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states, rejecting any suggestion that its recent joining of the Gaza Board of Peace signaled a change in its longstanding position on Israel.

The Abraham Accords are a series of US-brokered agreements signed in 2020 that established diplomatic, economic and security ties between Israel and several Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco. By contrast, the Gaza Board of Peace is a diplomatic initiative focused on supporting a ceasefire, humanitarian assistance and post-war reconstruction in Gaza, and does not involve recognition of Israel or security commitments.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif joined the Gaza Board of Peace earlier this month alongside other world leaders, prompting speculation that Islamabad’s involvement could be linked to broader regional normalization efforts. Pakistan does not recognize Israel and has consistently said it will not normalize ties without a just resolution of the Palestinian issue.

“It is a misconception that joining the Board of Peace is in any way connected to any Abraham Accords or any side draft to this issue. Pakistan’s positions remain unchanged and we will not become a party to the Abraham accord,” Foreign Office spokesman Tahir Andrabi told reporters at a weekly briefing. 

He said Pakistan had joined the Gaza Board of Peace “in good faith” and had not committed to any military role, adding that Islamabad had not decided to join the international stabilization force (ISF) for Gaza and that membership of the board did not imply contributing troops.

“Our basic objectives of joining the Board of Peace are three: one is to consolidate and sustain ceasefire, second is to support reconstruction, and third is to advance … a lasting peace based on the Palestinian right to self-determination,” he said.

The spokesman added that Pakistan was part of a broader collective effort, noting that seven other Muslim countries had also joined the initiative.

“Pakistan, joining the Board of Peace should be seen in the continuum of the initiative by eight Muslim countries to promote peace in Gaza, leading toward a lasting solution to the Palestinian question,” he said. 

“All eight countries have joined the Board of Peace with a single collective voice. The Board of Peace offers a viable glimmer of hope for Gaza and for wider Palestinian questions.”

Responding to another question, Andrabi said the peace board initiative did not replace the United Nations.

“We hope that the framework established by the Board of Peace will lead to concrete steps toward permanent ceasefire, expanded humanitarian assistance, and the reconstruction of Plaza, and in advanced Palestinian’s people’s right to self-determination,” he said, adding that Pakistan hoped the process would culminate in “an independent, sovereign, contiguous state of Palestine, based on the pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif, as its capital.”

“Pakistan looks forward to continuing to play a constructive role as part of the Board of Peace in achieving these goals. And ending the suffering of our Palestinian brothers and sisters,” he said.

USE OF FORCE AGAINST IRAN

Asked about reports of possible US military action against Iran and rising regional tensions, Andrabi said Pakistan opposed the use of force and supported diplomacy.

“Pakistan remains firmly opposed to interference in internal affairs of our brotherly country, Iran. We have opposed the use of force. We have opposed the imposition of sanctions and this position continues,” he said.

The comments come as the Middle East faces heightened tensions over Iran’s internal unrest and fraught relations with the United States. 

In recent weeks, widespread demonstrations have swept across major Iranian cities, driven by economic hardship, high inflation and discontent with the government’s handling of domestic issues. Human rights groups say hundreds of people have been killed and thousands arrested in repeated crackdowns on protests, some of the largest in the country since the 1979 revolution, as authorities impose Internet blackouts and other restrictions to suppress dissent.

At the same time, US-Iran tensions have escalated significantly. Washington has deployed a substantial naval presence, including an aircraft carrier strike group, to the region while issuing stern warnings to Tehran over its nuclear ambitions and other activities. 

President Donald Trump and senior US officials have signaled that military force remains an option if Iran does not comply with demands to negotiate, raising fears of wider conflict. Iran has rejected negotiations under pressure and vowed to defend itself if attacked, and regional and global leaders have called for restraint amid the growing risk of confrontation.

Against this backdrop of domestic upheaval and potential international escalation, Andrabi said Islamabad had reiterated its opposition to the use of force and stressed the importance of peace and diplomacy.

He said Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar had twice spoken by phone with his Iranian counterpart in recent days and had also engaged with US officials during the World Economic Forum in Davos last week.

“So, our advocacy for peace, diplomacy continues and this remains our stated position,” the FO spokesman said. “This region cannot afford war, turmoil, and because this, in essence, stops the economic development, peace, and prosperity. So, we hope that peace and diplomacy will prevail.”