Malaysia’s Najib to face verdict in mega 1MDB graft trial

Short Url
Updated 26 December 2025
Follow

Malaysia’s Najib to face verdict in mega 1MDB graft trial

  • If found guilty, the man once seen as political royalty faces years more behind bars, already serving a six-year jail term after a conviction in a separate case relating to the 1MDB fund

PUTRAJAYA: Former prime minister Najib Razak faces judgment on Friday for his alleged involvement in Malaysia’s 1MDB mega-graft scandal, with a guilty verdict likely to add years to a sentence already being served.
The 72-year-old stands accused of four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money laundering linked to the plunder of hundreds of millions of dollars from the Southeast Asian nation’s 1MDB sovereign wealth fund, sparking probes in several countries.
If found guilty, the man once seen as political royalty faces years more behind bars, already serving a six-year jail term after a conviction in a separate case relating to the 1MDB fund.
Friday’s hearing opened around 9:00 am (0100 GMT) before the Kuala Lumpur High Court, sitting in the country’s administrative capital of Putrajaya.
Presiding judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah started reading a lengthy verdict, before breaking for Friday afternoon prayers three hours later, with the hearing to resume at 3:00 pm.
It was not known whether sentencing would immediately follow a guilty verdict, but if acquitted, Najib will return to Kajang Prison outside Kuala Lumpur to continue serving his prior sentence.

- ‘Unmeritorious’ -

During the morning’s reading, Judge Sequerah slapped down several of the defense’s arguments, including that Najib was duped by his close associate, the shadowy businessman Low Taek Jho, better known as Jho Low.
“The evidence clearly points to the fact that this was no coincidence but was evident of a relationship in which Jho Low operated as a proxy or agent of the accused (Najib) with regard to the running of the affairs of 1MDB,” Sequerah said.
The defense’s argument that Najib was “misled and duped by management and by Jho Low is unmeritorious,” the judge said.
Low, who is currently on the run, is seen as the mastermind behind the scheme to plunder the country’s investment vehicle and spend the proceeds on everything from high-end real estate to pricey art, including a Monet and a Van Gogh.
Sequerah also dismissed arguments that money flowing into Najib’s accounts was “donations” from Middle East funders, calling it a “tale that surpassed even those from the Arabian Nights.”
The verdict will continue Friday afternoon in the marathon trial, seen as the main case in the 1MDB affair and which involves some 2.28 billion ringgit ($563 million).
Prosecutors say Najib abused his position as prime minister, finance minister and 1MDB advisory board chairman to move large amounts of money from the fund to his personal accounts more than a decade ago.
The prosecution presented bank records, testimony from over 50 witnesses and documentary evidence.
Najib “paints himself as a victim of rogue subordinates, when in truth, he was the single most powerful decision-maker,” deputy public prosecutor Ahmad Akram Gharib told the court during closing arguments.
“The accused wielded absolute financial, executive and political control,” he said.

- ‘No fair trial’ -

Najib’s lawyers have previously said the politician was unaware that 1MDB’s management was working hand in glove with Low to suck out large amounts of money from the fund, ostensibly established to foster economic growth in Malaysia.
Najib’s lawyer, Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, last week told journalists his client “never got a fair trial.”
He again blamed Low for the scandal, which sparked probes internationally, from neighboring Singapore to Europe and the United States, and rocked Malaysia’s image abroad.
Najib has issued an apology for the 1MDB scandal happening during his tenure, but maintains he knew nothing about illegal transfers from the now-defunct state fund.
His legal battle was dealt a blow on Monday after he lost a bid to serve the remainder of his current jail term at home.
Each count of abuse of power is punishable by up to 20 years in jail and a fine of up to five times the amount of the bribe.


Starmer’s chief of staff quits over former US ambassador's Epstein ties

Updated 11 sec ago
Follow

Starmer’s chief of staff quits over former US ambassador's Epstein ties

  • Morgan McSweeney said he took responsibility for advising UK's PM to appoint Peter Mandelson as Washington envoy
  • Epstein files suggest that Mandelson sent market-sensitive information to the convicted sex offender when he was part of UK government
LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's chief of staff resigned Sunday over the furor surrounding the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK ambassador to the US despite his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Morgan McSweeney said he took responsibility for advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson, 72, to Britain’s most important diplomatic post in 2024.
“The decision to appoint Peter Mandelson was wrong. He has damaged our party, our country and trust in politics itself,” McSweeney said in a statement. “When asked, I advised the Prime Minister to make that appointment and I take full responsibility for that advice.”
Starmer is facing a political storm and questions about his judgment after newly published documents, part of a huge trove of Epstein files made public in the United States, suggested that Mandelson sent market-sensitive information to the convicted sex offender when he was the UK government’s business secretary during the 2008 financial crisis.
Starmer’s government has promised to release its own emails and other documentation related to Mandelson’s appointment, which it says will show that Mandelson misled officials.
The prime minister apologized this week for “having believed Mandelson’s lies.”
He acknowledged that when Mandelson was chosen for the top diplomat job in 2024, the vetting process had revealed that Mandelson’s friendship with Epstein continued after the latter’s 2008 conviction. But Starmer maintained that “none of us knew the depth of the darkness” of that relationship at the time.
A number of lawmakers said Starmer is ultimately responsible for the scandal.
“Keir Starmer has to take responsibility for his own terrible decisions,” said Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition Conservative Party.
Mandelson, a former Cabinet minister, ambassador and elder statesman of the governing Labour Party, has not been arrested or charged.
Metropolitan Police officers searched Mandelson’s London home and another property linked to him on Friday. Police said the investigation is complex and will require “a significant amount of further evidence gathering and analysis.”
The UK police investigation centers on potential misconduct in public office, and Mandelson is not accused of any sexual offenses.
Starmer had fired Mandelson in September from his ambassadorial job over earlier revelations about his Epstein ties. But critics say the emails recently published by the US Justice Department have brought serious concerns about Starmer’s judgment to the fore. They argue that he should have known better than to appoint Mandelson in the first place.
The new revelations include documents suggesting Mandelson shared sensitive government information with Epstein after the 2008 global financial crisis. They also include records of payments totaling $75,000 in 2003 and 2004 from Epstein to accounts linked to Mandelson or his husband Reinaldo Avila da Silva.
Aside from his association with Epstein, Mandelson previously had to resign twice from senior government posts because of scandals over money or ethics.
Starmer had faced growing pressure over the past week to fire McSweeney, who is regarded as a key adviser in Downing Street and seen as a close ally of Mandelson.
Starmer on Sunday credited McSweeney as a central figure in running Labour’s recent election campaign and the party’s 2004 landslide victory. His statement did not mention the Mandelson scandal.