Individuals could be ‘wrongly’ criminalized after Palestine Action ban, UK Home Office official warns

Supporters of alleged Palestine Action activists accused of breaking into Israeli-based defence firm Elbit Systems’ site in Bristol in August 2024, hold placards and wave Palestinian flags outside Woolwich Crown Court in south east London, where the activists are due to stand trial, Nov. 17, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 November 2025
Follow

Individuals could be ‘wrongly’ criminalized after Palestine Action ban, UK Home Office official warns

  • Co-founder of Palestine Action Huda Ammori is suing former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper this week for her decision to designate the group under anti-terror laws in July
  • Individuals supporting Palestine advocacy, but not Palestine Action, are wrongly labeled as extremists, and supporters of Palestine Action are referred to Prevent despite posing no threat, an official says

LONDON: The ban on Palestine Action has led to people in the UK being wrongly labeled as extremists, and the anti-terrorism Prevent program risks being overwhelmed, a member of the Home Office’s homeland security group has warned.

Prevent duty, established in 2015, mandates certain British authorities, such as education and health, to report concerns about individuals who are vulnerable to radicalization.

The official, who works closely with Prevent, told The Guardian that the proscription of Palestine Action has confused counterterrorism police, officials, schools, and hospitals. They expressed concern that individuals supporting Palestine advocacy, but not Palestine Action, are wrongly labeled as extremists, and that supporters of Palestine Action are referred to Prevent despite posing no threat.

Co-founder of Palestine Action Huda Ammori is suing former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper this week for her decision to designate the group under anti-terror laws in July.

“I’m concerned about a surge in referrals to the Prevent system that might have a link to Palestine advocacy in light of the fact that this very high-profile group is now proscribed, and the confusion there might be on the frontline in schools and healthcare settings and all the other places that are expected to make Prevent referrals.

“I’ve heard senior counterterrorism police people say that they are already seeing on the frontline concerns about this come up and I’m aware of testimonies from Prevent leads at local authorities where they are also concerned about the impact of this on their area and confusion about whether certain cases should be referred to Prevent or not.”

Referrals to the anti-terrorism program rose by 27 percent in the year to March 2025, marking the highest number since records began. The official also expressed concerns that Prevent could be “overwhelmed” by referrals related to Palestine Action.

“We have already seen police officers, let alone frontline Prevent practitioners, mistakenly arrest or interfere with people for supporting Palestine, not supporting Palestine Action.

“There is a risk that what’s now the crime of support for Palestine Action might lead to the Prevent system becoming an unwitting sort of gateway for people to mistakenly be criminalized, especially young people who don’t know the law and they don’t know the consequences of expressing what might sound like — or may actually be — support for a group that, overnight, has become proscribed.”

The official who spoke to The Guardian expressed concern that the ban had undermined the credibility of essential counterterrorism efforts.

“The proscription has damaged trust in the government more widely and Prevent specifically — so potentially eroding Prevent’s effectiveness to tackle the real issues even further,” they said.

A spokesperson for the Home Office said: “We do not comment on anonymous briefings.

“Supporting Palestine is not the same as supporting a proscribed terrorist organization. There are many lawful ways to express support for Palestinian rights and sovereignty without being a member of, or associated with, this harmful group.”

Palestine Action was banned after an alleged attack on two planes at RAF Brize Norton in June, causing £7 million ($9.3 million) in damage, for which five members face vandalism charges. Moreover, 24 individuals face charges over a break-in at the UK site of the Israel-based defense firm Elbit Systems in Bristol that occurred in August.

Supporting Palestine Action is now a criminal offense in the UK, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.


‘Not Winston Churchill’: Trump steps up criticism of UK’s Starmer

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

‘Not Winston Churchill’: Trump steps up criticism of UK’s Starmer

  • Trump criticized Starmer’s decision to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, home to the Diego Garcia air base, ‌saying that they have ‘been very, very uncooperative with with that stupid island’
  • Donald Trump: ‘France has been great. They’ve all been great. The UK has been much different from others’
LONDON/WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump intensified his criticism of Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Tuesday, ​saying his lack of immediate support for US strikes on Iran showed “this is not Winston Churchill we’re dealing with.” Trump has lashed out at Starmer three times this week after he said neither the British military, or its air bases, were involved in the initial US and Israeli strikes on Tehran that killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Starmer told parliament that the government had learnt from its mistakes in backing the US in the 2003 Iraq war, and said any military action must have a “viable, thought-through plan.” He also said he did not believe in “regime change from the skies.” But ‌Starmer has since ‌allowed the US to use UK bases to launch what he ​called ‌limited ⁠and defensive ​strikes ⁠to weaken Tehran’s capabilities, after Iran hit US allies in the region with drones and missiles. On Monday, a British base in Cyprus was hit by a drone that Cypriot officials said was likely launched by Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah, prompting London to send a destroyer and more helicopters with counter-drone technology to the region.
Trump told reporters during a meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he was very disappointed with Britain.
“This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” he said, comparing Starmer with Britain’s revered ⁠wartime leader.
Trump also criticized Starmer’s decision to cede sovereignty of the Chagos ‌Archipelago, home to the US-UK air base of Diego Garcia, ‌saying they have “been very, very uncooperative with that stupid island.”

Starmer has ‌been criticized from all sides at home for his decision, with opponents on the left calling ‌for him to condemn the military action while on the right, opposition leaders Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage attacked Starmer for failing to back Britain’s key security and intelligence ally.
Britain has long prided itself on its relationship with the US, aided by British leaders such as Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair cultivating strong relationships with their counterparts, ‌Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.
Starmer, a center-left former lawyer, surprised his critics when he too struck up a solid relationship ⁠with Trump, but that has ⁠been tested in the last year as the US leader became more combative on a number of fronts. Trump earlier told the Sun newspaper he never thought he would see Britain become a reluctant partner, instead heaping praise on France and Germany.
“This was the most solid relationship of all,” he said. “And now we have very strong relationships with other countries in Europe.”
“France has been great. They’ve all been great. The UK has been much different from others.”
Britain, France and Germany released a joint statement in response to Iranian attacks on Saturday, saying they were in close contact with the US, Israel and partners in the region, and were calling for a resumption of negotiations.
Starmer has defended his response, telling parliament on Monday he had to judge what was in Britain’s national interest. “That is what ​I have done, and I stand by ​it,” he said.
Polling published by YouGov on Tuesday showed people in Britain were opposed to the US strikes on Iran by 49 percent to 28 percent.