Washington, Kyiv say a peace deal must ‘fully uphold’ Ukraine sovereignty

1 / 2
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, right, and Andriy Yermak, head of Ukraine's Office of the President, talk to the press as their consultations continue at the US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva on Nov. 23, 2025. (Keystone via AP)
2 / 2
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, next to US special envoy Steve Witkoff, faces the Ukrainian delegation during discussions on US plan to end the war in Ukraine at US Mission in Geneva, on Nov. 23, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 November 2025
Follow

Washington, Kyiv say a peace deal must ‘fully uphold’ Ukraine sovereignty

  • Joint statement after initial meeting announced that the “talks were constructive ... underscoring the shared commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace” 
  • Kyiv and EU allies are seeking changes to Trump's 28-point plan requiring the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO

GENEVA: Washington and Kyiv said Sunday that any eventual deal to halt the war with Russia must fully uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty, after “constructive” talks between US, Ukrainian and European officials in Geneva.
After a day of meetings that kicked off based on a US proposal that was criticized as being in Russia’s favor, negotiators have drafted “an updated and refined peace framework,” a US-Ukraine joint statement said.
US President Donald Trump had given Ukraine until November 27 to approve his plan to end the nearly four-year conflict, which began after Russia launched a full-scale invasion.
But Kyiv was seeking changes to the draft that accepted a range of Russia’s hard-line demands, with the 28-point plan requiring the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO.
“The talks were constructive, focused, and respectful, underscoring the shared commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace,” the joint statement said.
“They reaffirmed that any future agreement must fully uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty and deliver a sustainable and just peace,” it said, noting “meaningful progress.”

 

Both sides pledged to keep working on joint proposals “in the coming days.”
But even as the White House said in a separate statement that the talks marked “a “significant step forward,” a Russian drone strike on the major Ukrainian city of Kharkiv killed four people, its mayor said.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio boasted “tremendous” progress after a day of meetings, while the head of Ukraine’s delegation Andriy Yermak also told reporters the sides had made “very good progress.”
Rubio, whose delegation included Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff, told reporters that the work to narrow the areas of disagreement had advanced “in a very substantial way.”
“I can tell you that the items that remain open are not insurmountable,” he said, adding “I honestly believe we’ll get there.”
Rubio stressed that any final agreement would “have to be agreed upon by the presidents, and there are a couple issues that we need to continue to work on” before trying to bring onboard the Kremlin, which welcomed the original proposal.
“Obviously, the Russians get a vote.”




Medical workers carry a body at the site of a building hit during Russian drone strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine, on Nov. 23, 2025. (REUTERS)

‘Zero gratitude’ claim 

His comments came after Trump earlier lashed out at Ukraine.
“UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, also accusing European countries of not doing enough to stop the war, but offering no direct condemnation of Moscow.
Not long after, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on X that his country was “grateful to the United States... and personally to President Trump” for the assistance that has been “saving Ukrainian lives.”
Announcing a deadly Russian drone strike, Kharkiv mayor Igor Terekhov said on Telegram Sunday it was “truly horrible” that despite the negotiations, “Russian troops are attacking civilian objects, civilian infrastructure, residential buildings.”
The Ukrainian delegation had referred to a new version of the US draft plan, which has yet to be published, saying it “already reflects most of Ukraine’s key priorities.”
At the end of the day, Rubio said he thought Trump was “quite pleased at the reports we’ve given him about the amount of progress that’s been made.”
Asked about whether he believed a deal could be reached by Thursday, as demanded by the US president, he said “the deadline is we want to get this done as soon as possible.”
“I think we made a tremendous amount of progress. I feel very optimistic that we’re going to get there in a very reasonable period of time, very soon.”




Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Andriy Yermak, center, at the beginning of talks with the US delegation at the US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 23, 2025. (Keystone via AP)

European ‘centrality’ 

Rubio said that his delegation had met Sunday with “national security advisers from various European countries.”
Ukraine’s delegation also met high-level officials from Britain, France and Germany.
The US plan was drafted without input from Ukraine’s European allies, who were scrambling Sunday to make their voices heard and boost Kyiv’s position.
“Ukraine must have the freedom and sovereign right to choose its own destiny. They have chosen a European destiny,” EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement, stressing that the “centrality” of the European Union’s role must be “fully reflected” in any peace plan.
A number of leaders called Trump Sunday, with Downing Street saying UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the US president had agreed “that we all must work together at this critical moment to bring about a just and lasting peace.”
 


Around the world, refugees are shut out of the US by Trump’s new policies

U.S. Chief Border Patrol Agent, Gregory Bovino talks to a detained migrant on December 5, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (AFP)
Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Around the world, refugees are shut out of the US by Trump’s new policies

  • About 600,000 people were being processed to come to the US as refugees around the world when the program was halted, according to the administration

WASHINGTON: When President Donald Trump suspended the refugee program on day one of his current administration, thousands of people around the world who had been so close to a new life in America found themselves abandoned.
Many had already sold possessions or ended leases in preparation for travel. They had submitted reams of documents supporting their cases, been interviewed by US officials and in many cases already had tickets to fly to America.
As part of Trump’s crackdown on both legal and illegal migration, the Republican president has upended the decades-old refugee program that has served as a beacon for those fleeing war and persecution. In October, he resumed the program but set a historic low of refugee admissions at just 7,500 — mostly white South Africans.
A litany of new restrictions was announced after an Afghan national became the suspect in the shooting of two National Guard members last week. The Trump administration also plans a review of refugees let in during the Democratic Biden administration. Trump’s administration has cited economic and national security concerns for its policy changes.
About 600,000 people were being processed to come to the US as refugees around the world when the program was halted, according to the administration. Dozens of white South Africans have been let in this year. But only about 100 others have been admitted as a result of a lawsuit by advocates seeking to restart the refugee program, said Mevlüde Akay Alp, a lawyer arguing the case.
“It’s important that we don’t abandon those families and that we don’t abandon the thousands of people who were relying on the promise of coming here as refugees,” said Akay Alp, with the International Refugee Assistance Project.
The Associated Press spoke to three families whose lives have been thrown into disarray because of the changing policies.
A family separated by tightened restrictions
The Dawoods had waited years for the opportunity to come to the US After fleeing civil war in Syria, they settled in northern Iraq. They hoped to find a home that could provide better medical care for a daughter who had fallen from the fourth floor of the family’s apartment building.
After they were accepted as refugees to the US, son Ibrahim and his sister Ava relocated to New Haven, Connecticut, in November 2024. His parents and one of his brothers were scheduled to fly in January.
But just two days before they were to board their flight, mother Hayat Fatah fainted at a medical check and her departure was postponed. Mohammed, another sibling, didn’t want to leave his parents behind.
“I said: ‘This is it. The chance is gone.’ But I had to stay with my father and mother,” Mohammed said.
Nearly a year later, he and his parents are still waiting. Without a residency card, Mohammed can’t work or travel outside of their home in the city of Irbil. The family gets by on money sent from relatives abroad.
Mohammed had dreams for his hoped-for new life in America: starting a business or finishing his studies to become a petroleum engineer; getting married and building a family.
“Whether it was now, a year from now, two years later or four years, I will wait and hope that I will go,” he said.
In America, Ibrahim often wakes up early to tutor people online before going to his job as a math teacher at a private school, and then he takes care of his sister when he gets home. He said his mother often cries when they talk because she wishes she were in America to help care for her daughter.
Ibrahim said one solace has been the welcome he’s received in the US Volunteers have stepped in to take him and his sister to frequent doctor appointments and helped them adjust to their new lives.
“I really appreciate the kindness of the people here,” he said.
After a decade in limbo, a Chinese pastor wonders when his turn will come
Chinese Christian Lu Taizhi fled to Thailand more than a decade ago, fearing persecution for his beliefs. He’s lived in legal limbo since, waiting to be resettled in the United States.
Lu said he has long admired the US for what he calls its Christian character — a place where he feels he and his family “can seek freedom.” He said he was disappointed that people like him and his family who applied for refugee status legally face so many difficulties in going to the US
“I oppose illegal immigration. Many are fake refugees, or illegal immigrants, they’ve never faced oppression. I’m opposed to this,” Lu said. “But I hope America can accept people like us, real refugees who faced real oppression. … It’s really disappointing.”
Lu comes from a long lineage of dissent: He was born into a family branded as “hostile elements” by the Chinese Communist Party for its land ownership and ties to a competing political party. A teacher and poet, Lu grew interested in history banned by the Chinese state, penning tributes to the bloody 1989 Tiananmen crackdown on pro-democracy protests in Beijing.
In 2004, Lu was arrested after police found poems and essays he secretly published criticizing Chinese politics and the education system. After his release, Lu became a Christian and began preaching, drawing scrutiny from local authorities. Year after year, officers knocked on his door, warning him not to organize protests or publish commentary criticizing the Party.
With Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s rise to power, controls tightened. When Beijing arrested hundreds of rights lawyers in 2015, Lu took his family and fled, worried police would come for him. After traveling across Southeast Asia, Lu and his family settled in Thailand, where they applied for refugee status with the United Nations.
Eight years later, the UN notified Lu the US had accepted his application. But their first flight, in April 2024, was postponed because Lu’s sons’ passports had expired. A second, scheduled for Jan. 22, 2025, was canceled without explanation, and the most recent one, scheduled for Feb. 26, was canceled shortly after Trump’s inauguration. His application has been put on hold indefinitely, Lu said.
Today, Lu is scraping a meager living as a teacher and pastor in Northern Thailand. He’s separated from his wife and children in Bangkok, Thailand’s capital, but says he has no choice if he wants to earn money and support his family.
“I am very supportive of all of Trump’s policies because I think only President Trump can dismantle the CCP,” Lu said, using an acronym referring to the Chinese Communist Party. “So I don’t have any complaints. I just wait silently.”
‘I don’t want to lose her’
Louis arrived in the United States as a refugee in September 2024. He left his wife and two children in East Africa, hoping they could soon be reunited in the US
But that dream faded a few months later with Trump’s return to the presidency.
Louis, who insisted on being identified only by his first name out of concern that speaking publicly could complicate his case, was told in January that a request he had made to bring his family to the US had been frozen due to changes in refugee policies.
Now, the family members live thousands of miles apart without knowing when they will be reunited. His wife, Apolina, and the children, 2 and 3 years old, are in a refugee camp in Uganda. Louis is in Kentucky.
“I don’t want to lose her, and she does not want to lose me,” said Louis, who resettled in Kentucky with the help of the International Rescue Committee. “The hope that I had went slowly down. I thought that we would never meet again,” he said referring to the moment when he received the notice.
Louis and Apolina’s families applied for refugee status after fleeing war in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Louis’ application, initiated by his parents, was approved, Apolina’s, made separately by her parents, was not. They hoped if Louis applied for family reunification in the US, that would ease the way to bring over Apolina and the two children.
Apolina thought that, as the wife of a refugee, it would take her no more than one year to reunite with her husband, who now works in an appliance factory and has already applied for permanent residency.
The separation hasn’t been easy for her and the children, who live in a tent in the refugee camp. The younger one, who was 7 months old when Louis left, cries every time he sees his father in a video call. The older one keeps asking where Louis is and when he will see him.
Apolina fears that as time drags on, the children will forget their father.
“I feel terrible because I miss my husband very much,” said Apolina in a phone interview from Uganda. “I pray for him that God enables him to be patient until we meet again.”