China unleashes ‘wolf warriors’ in diplomatic duel with Japan

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi earlier said that an attack on Taiwan threatening Japan’s survival would trigger a military response from Tokyo. (JIJI Press/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 21 November 2025
Follow

China unleashes ‘wolf warriors’ in diplomatic duel with Japan

  • Chinese diplomats use social media to amplify criticism
  • Japan seeks to ease tension, aware of China’s comments

BEIJING/TOKYO: Chinese diplomats airing hawkish views, or “wolf warriors” as they are known, have returned to the global stage, drumming up criticism of Japan’s prime minister in countries that suffered from its military actions during World War Two.
A fortnight after new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan threatening Japan’s survival would trigger a military response from Tokyo, China has not slowed the momentum of the vitriol poured out on her.
“The international community should focus more on understanding Japan’s true intentions and whether Japan can still adhere to the path of peaceful development,” said Mao Ning, a foreign ministry spokesperson.
She was responding to a query about China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy, characterized by a pointed and often acerbic style of engagement on social media, made at a regular briefing on Friday.
In Tokyo, speaking shortly before her departure for a G2O leaders’ summit in South Africa, Takaichi said her position was unchanged and her comment did not represent a change in Japan’s policy toward Taiwan.
More countermeasures
China has repeatedly demanded retraction of the original remarks, failing which it has threatened more countermeasures, after warning citizens against travel to Japan, banning imports of its seafood, and voicing criticism by its diplomats abroad.
The original episode of “wolf warrior” diplomacy, dating from 2020 and taking its name from a popular Chinese movie franchise, marked a departure from the restraint that had long marked Beijing’s engagement with the world.
The first sign of China’s renewed tactics emerged in Japan two weeks ago with a posting on X by its consul general in Osaka, but later deleted.
“The dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” the diplomat said after Takaichi’s comments. Beijing called the post a personal one.
Online discussion has linked the comment to “The Sword March,” a Chinese war song from the 1930s that aroused morale against the Japanese invasion of the country in that period.
Its lyrics began with the words, “swords raised over the devils’ heads to hack them off.”
Highlighting history
After the diplomat’s post, peers in countries formerly occupied by Japan during the war chimed in. Some targeted Takaichi directly, framing her as a figure whose leadership style sparks concern, and urged caution.
“Japan’s rising calls for military expansion are worthy of vigilance from all countries that suffered the ravages of war – and recent remarks from its new leader only add to the concern,” China’s embassy in Manila posted on X.
Four accompanying caricatures showed ghosts in a representation of Japanese militarism looming over Takaichi, and one featured her as a witch.
“Today’s China is no longer the China of the past,” the embassy said. “If Japan dares to follow through on military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, it will constitute an act of aggression – and China will certainly strike back resolutely!”
Beijing claims democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory and has not ruled out using force to take control of the island. Taiwan’s government rejects the claims.
Memories of wartime aggression
Wang Lutong, China’s ambassador to Indonesia posted on X a clip of Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s comments to the press in March, along with a quote, “The truth is, to provoke trouble in the name of Taiwan is to invite trouble for Japan.”
Diplomats also accused Takaichi of reviving wartime aggression.
People in Taiwan “suffered enormously” from Japan’s “crimes and atrocities” after it “forcibly occupied ... and exerted colonial rule” on the island, Mao, the foreign ministry spokesperson said in a post on X on Friday.
These included killings, denial of political rights and plunder of mineral resources, she added.
In response, Taiwan’s foreign ministry said the island’s sovereignty belonged to all its people.
“In recent years, China has frequently dispatched military aircraft and vessels to conduct large-scale military activities in the Taiwan Strait and the East China Sea,” it said.
It added that such activities seriously undermined regional peace and stability, for a continuing rise in tension.
Targeting the West
China’s diplomatic messaging aimed at the West sought to discredit Takaichi in the global arena.
Its permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, called Takaichi’s behavior “egregious” and questioned her credibility to uphold peace and security.
“How can the international community trust Japan’s professed commitment to peaceful development?” Fu asked in a post this week on X that also queried its trustworthiness in areas such as fairness and justice and international peace and security.
In Canberra, the Chinese embassy posted clips of a Japanese scholar calling out Takaichi’s remarks as “extremely problematic and foolish,” and cited an anti-militarization panel as calling her “unfit to serve.”
In the United States, the Washington embassy has regularly reposted the Chinese foreign ministry’s messaging.
Japan, which has attempted to narrow the rift, said it is aware of the numerous posts.
It has not responded to the Chinese criticism, except for repeated complaints about the remarks of the Osaka diplomat, as it looks to tamp down tensions.
“The government is taking appropriate measures,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara told reporters at a regular briefing on Friday, but said he would refrain from comment on individual remarks.


Trump is fighting the Institute of Peace in court. Now, his name is on the building

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Trump is fighting the Institute of Peace in court. Now, his name is on the building

  • State Department said it renamed the organization to the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace to “reflect the greatest dealmaker in our nation’s history.”
  • The takeover of the Peace Institute was also anything but peaceful, with his administration seizing the independent entity and ousting its board before affixing his name to the building

State Department said it renamed the organization to the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace to “reflect the greatest dealmaker in our nation’s history.”

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has renamed the US Institute of Peace after President Donald Trump and has planted the president’s name on its headquarters despite an ongoing fight over control of the institute.
It’s the latest twist in a seesaw court battle over who controls the US Institute of Peace, a nonprofit think tank that focuses on peace initiatives. It was an early target of the Department of Government Efficiency this year.
On Wednesday, the State Department said it renamed the organization to the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace to “reflect the greatest dealmaker in our nation’s history.” The new name could be seen on its building, which is near the State Department.
Trump has spent months openly lobbying for a Nobel Peace Prize even though he was passed over for this year’s installment, arguing he had a hand in easing a series of conflicts around the world. But Trump has also ordered strikes on suspected drug vessels off the coast of Venezuela and threatened that attacks on land could be coming.
The takeover of the Peace Institute was also anything but peaceful, with his administration seizing the independent entity and ousting its board before affixing his name to the building.

A sign reads "Donald J. Trump" on the building of the United States Institute of Peace after the name of US president was added to the sign for the Institute in Washington, D.C., on December 4, 2025. (REUTERS)

Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said: “The United States Institute of Peace was once a bloated, useless entity that blew $50 million per year while delivering no peace. Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named after a President who ended eight wars in less than a year, will stand as a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability.”
She added, “Congratulations, world!”
George Foote, a lawyer for the institute’s former leadership and staff, said the renaming “adds insult to injury.”
“A federal judge has already ruled that the government’s armed takeover was illegal. That judgment is stayed while the government appeals, which is the only reason the government continues to control the building,” Foote said.
Since March, the headquarters has switched hands multiple times in court actions related to the DOGE takeover. A final decision on its fate is pending in federal appeals court.
USIP has maintained it is an independent creation of Congress and outside the president’s executive authority. The administration argues it is an executive branch organization.
After Trump fired the institute’s board in the the spring, the staff was fired as well and the building was turned over to the General Services Administration.
A federal district court overturned the action in May, putting the headquarters back into the hands of USIP leadership. But that action was reversed weeks later by a federal appeals court.
Employees have been fired twice, and the building is no longer in GSA’s possession. The State Department and the institute have an agreement that allows the State Department to occupy and use the building.
The building is expected to be the backdrop for the signing of a peace agreement Thursday between Congo’s President Felix Tshisekedi and Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame. High-ranking officials from the African Union, Angola, Burundi, Kenya, Togo, Qatar, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates are also expected to attend the signing, according to Yolande Makolo, a senior adviser to Kagame.
The USIP website remained unchanged Wednesday night, but its lead item was headlined, “President Donald J. Trump to Sign Historic Peace Agreement at USIP Headquarters,” followed by a write-up of the deal between Congo and Rwanda that Trump was overseeing at the institute on Thursday.
The Institute of Peace was created by Congress in the 1980s. President Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law in 1985. Described as an independent, nonprofit think tank funded by Congress, its mission has been to work to promote peace and prevent and end conflicts while working outside normal channels such as the State Department. It was operating in 26 conflict zones, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Mali and Burkina Faso, when DOGE shut the operation down.
As had been broadly speculated, Trump was awarded a new peace prize from FIFA on Friday, on the sidelines of the World Cup draw.  FIFA president Gianni Infantino had made it clear that he thought Trump should have won the Nobel for his efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza.

“This is your prize, this is your peace prize,” Infantino said. He has repeatedly spoken about soccer as a unifier for the world, but the prize is a departure from the federation’s traditional focus on sport.