Barrick considers splitting into two entities threatening sale of Pakistan’s Reko Diq mine

People visit a section sponsored by Canadian headquartered mining company Barrick Gold Corporation at the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) annual conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on March 7, 2023. (REUTERS/File)
Short Url
Updated 15 November 2025
Follow

Barrick considers splitting into two entities threatening sale of Pakistan’s Reko Diq mine

  • Shares of Barrick Mining rose on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Friday following the report, closing up 3%
  • Investors say Barrick’s shares are undervalued, ask firm to find ways to take advantage of gold price rally

TORONTO: The board of Canada’s Barrick Mining has raised the possibility of splitting the company into two separate entities, one focused on North America and the other on Africa and Asia, four sources familiar with the company’s thinking told Reuters.

A split could also include the outright sale of Barrick’s African assets as well as of the Reko Diq mine in Pakistan, once it has secured financing, according to the sources.

In Mali, Barrick is looking to resolve a dispute with the African nation’s military administration before selling the asset, sources said.

A Barrick spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Interim CEO Mark Hill, asked on Monday about a possible split, said the company does not comment on speculation.

Talks are ongoing and nothing has yet been finalized, the sources said. The plans, if they go through, would essentially reverse Barrick’s merger with Randgold in 2019, and shed assets brought in by former CEO Mark Bristow.

The company’s focus on North America, including Fourmile, a major undeveloped gold mine in Nevada, would ensure that Barrick does not get undervalued in case of a potential takeover offer, one of the sources said.

Fourmile mine test production is not due to start until 2029.

Hill said earlier this week that the company would shift its focus to North America, prompting a ratings upgrade on its shares by analysts at Jefferies and elsewhere.

Shares of Barrick rose on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Friday following the Reuters report, closing up 3 percent. Investors have said Barrick’s shares are undervalued and have asked the company to find ways to take better advantage of a historic rally in gold prices.

Although Barrick shares have jumped 130 percent this year, in the last five years the company’s returns have been lower than its peers, gaining 52 percent while Agnico Eagle has jumped 142%.

Investors had previously proposed that the company divide into one division with stable assets such as Nevada and Fourmile, and another with riskier assets in Africa, Papua New Guinea, and Reko Diq, one of the people said.

As one of the few gold mining companies with assets spanning multiple continents, Barrick’s biggest risk has been mines in politically volatile regions, investors say. Earlier this year, Barrick lost control of its most profitable mine, the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in Mali, leading to a $1 billion write-off. A dispute over the country’s new mining tax code led to the seizure of 3 metric tons of gold and a provisional administrator taking charge of the mine. Four Barrick employees are still incarcerated by the Malian administration.

“There has been a view that there is a lot of value in Nevada,” said one Barrick investor.

If the Nevada mine were a publicly listed company on its own, it would be one of the world’s largest-capitalized gold mining companies, the investor added, asking not to be identified as they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The company has resisted splitting in the past because without Nevada, this investor said, there is not much of value in its other mines. Barrick runs the Nevada gold mine in partnership with Newmont Corp.

In addition to Nevada and Mali, the company’s other working facilities include copper mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, gold in Tanzania, the Dominican Republic, and Papua New Guinea.


‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

‘Fully stand with Bangladesh’: Pakistan PM backs decision to boycott India match

  • Pakistan’s government have not allowed the national cricket team to play its World Cup match against India on Feb. 15
  • Pakistan has accused India of influencing ICC decisions, criticized global cricket body for replacing Bangladesh in World Cup

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday backed his government’s decision to bar the national men’s cricket team from playing against India in the upcoming T20 World Cup tournament, reaffirming support for Bangladesh. 

Pakistan’s government announced on social media platform X last week that it has allowed its national team to travel to Sri Lanka for the World Cup. However, it said the Green Shirts will not take the field against India on their scheduled match on Feb. 15. 

Pakistan’s participation in the tournament was thrown into doubt after Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi criticized the International Cricket Council (ICC) for replacing Bangladesh with Scotland. The decision was taken after Bangladesh said it would not let its team travel to India out of security concerns. 

During a meeting of the federal cabinet, Sharif highlighted that Pakistan has said that politics should be kept away from sports. 

“We have taken this stand after careful consideration and in this regard, we should stand fully with Bangladesh,” Sharif said in televised remarks. 

“And I believe this is a very reasonable decision.”

Pakistan has blamed India for influencing the ICC’s decisions. The global cricket governing body is currently led by Jay Shah, the head of the Board of Control for Cricket in India. Shah is the son of Indian Home Minister Amit Shah. 

Pakistan’s boycott announcement has triggered media frenzy worldwide, with several Indian cricket experts and analysts criticizing Islamabad for the decision. An India-Pakistan cricket contest is by far the most lucrative and eagerly watched match of any ICC tournament. 

The ICC has ensured that the two rivals and Asian cricket giants are always in the same group of any ICC event since 2012 to capitalize on the high-stakes game. 

The two teams have played each other at neutral venues over the past several years, as bilateral cricket remains suspended between them since 2013 due to political tensions. 

Those tensions have persisted since the two nuclear-armed nations engaged in the worst fighting between them since 1999 in May 2025, after India blamed Pakistan for an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed tourists. 

Pakistan denied India’s allegations that it was involved in the attack, calling for a credible probe into the incident.