UK government faces legal action over failure to help evacuate Gaza families

According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, the death toll has risen beyond 67,000. Israel has been accused by the UN of violating the October ceasefire and committing acts of genocide. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 11 November 2025
Follow

UK government faces legal action over failure to help evacuate Gaza families

  • Two fathers in the UK have instructed the law firm Leigh Day to act on their behalf

LONDON: The British government is facing legal action over its alleged failure to assist in the evacuation of families trapped in Gaza, despite pledging months ago to do so, The Guardian reported on Tuesday.

Two fathers in the UK have instructed the law firm Leigh Day to act on their behalf, arguing that the government’s inaction is unlawful and breaches their families’ human rights.

“I wished that I didn’t have to do this, that it didn’t have to reach this level that I’d have to involve courts,” said one father in the UK, who asked to remain anonymous. “I wish anyone would intervene and take my children out of the life that they are living.”

The man, who was granted humanitarian protection in the UK before the war broke out in 2023, said he was informed by the British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in August that he would soon be reunited with his family after they received a positive family reunion decision the previous month.

In Gaza City, the man’s wife, three children and adopted nephew are now living in a tent in Al-Zawida. His wife walks for an hour to make phone calls to him, and he says his children have been shot at by Israeli forces while trying to collect aid. Their flour and rice have also been taken by gangs, he added.

“It was really shocking to see that this didn’t actually end up happening,” said the 39-year-old, who is from Gaza City and spoke through a translator.

He compared the government’s handling of the case to “being released from prison, only to be told you have to return.”

He added: “The war is not over, there’s still aggression from Israel, there’s no food or water, people are not OK.”

According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, the death toll has risen beyond 67,000. Israel has been accused by the UN of violating the October ceasefire and committing acts of genocide.

In August, the British government announced plans to evacuate ill and injured children from Gaza. However, medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres has urged the authorities to scale up those efforts after only a small number of children were brought to the UK.

Two months later, the government said Palestinian students with scholarships at UK universities would be allowed to bring family members from Gaza on a case-by-case basis.

“My children are students as well,” the father said. “Why shouldn’t (they) be brought here?”

Although the family has an approved reunion decision, they remain unable to travel because of biometric requirements. With no visa application center in Gaza, lawyers say the UK government has refused to secure assurances from Jordanian authorities to allow the family to cross the border for biometric checks there.

The FCDO, which was contacted for comment, is understood to have responded to a pre-action letter in October stating that the family could not be assisted at present, and that the differential treatment between them, students and medical evacuees was not unlawful.

Sarah Crowe, a solicitor at Leigh Day, said the government had “turned its back” on promises to help ensure their clients’ safe passage.

“Meanwhile, other groups have been safely evacuated under similar circumstances. Our clients argue that this differential treatment is not only unjustifiable and unfair, it is unlawful,” said Crowe.

Another father in the UK, who also requested anonymity, has launched separate legal action to reunite with his six children in Gaza.

Earlier this year, the government agreed to assist the family after a pre-action letter, but they now say that commitment has not been upheld.

Speaking through a translator, he said relatives in Gaza are living in a tent after their home was bombed, and that they are entirely dependent on charities for food.

His daughter has developed blood clots in her legs, while his son struggles to breathe after inhaling phosphorus gas, he said. In the UK, his two daughters often ask when their siblings will arrive.

He described himself as exhausted and emotionally broken.

“My children were supposed to be here in May,” said the father, who fled Gaza in 2018 after being imprisoned and tortured by Hamas. “I was supposed to have already been with them for five or six months now.”

A government spokesperson said: “It would be inappropriate to comment while legal proceedings are ongoing.”

Earlier this year, figures showed how Home Office bureaucracy has made it nearly impossible for people trapped in war zones such as Gaza and Sudan to reunite with relatives in the UK. For months, campaigners and parliamentarians have called for a bespoke humanitarian scheme similar to the one created for Ukrainians following Russia’s invasion.


Hong Kong firm begins arbitration proceedings over ruling against its Panama Canal port contract

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Hong Kong firm begins arbitration proceedings over ruling against its Panama Canal port contract

  • The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio views the operation of the ports as a national security issue
HONG KONG: Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison Holdings said Wednesday its subsidiary started arbitration proceedings against Panama after that country’s Supreme Court ruled a concession for the subsidiary to operate Panama Canal ports was unconstitutional.
Hutchison said it strongly disagreed with last week’s ruling, and China warned Panama would pay “a heavy price” if it persisted. Panama’s president has moved to assure the public that the ports would operate without interruption after the ruling, which advanced a US aim to block any influence by China over the canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, began arbitration proceedings Tuesday under the rules of the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, the company said in a statement.
The rules are overseen by the chamber’s International Court of Arbitration, an independent body, and it’s unclear what the impact of the proceedings would be. The Panamanian president’s office and commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Tuesday local time.
The ruling draws ire from China
The court ruling has drawn backlash from China, and the tensions may complicate Hutchison’s plan to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc.
The planned sale has already been caught up in tensions between Beijing and Washington. US President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly authorities.
On Tuesday night, Beijing’s office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the Panama court ruling as legally groundless and ridiculous, saying the ruling reflected that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to hegemonic powers. It did not specify the countries but pointed to politicians from some countries who had said they were “encouraged” by the ruling, in an apparent veiled reference to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
In a statement shared on social media platform WeChat, the office said that China will never bow to hegemonism and has sufficient means and tools, as well as capability, to uphold justice in the international economic and trade order.
“Panama’s authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course,” it said. “If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!”
A company caught in US-China tensions
The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. The awkward position Hutchison found itself in highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing’s expectations of national loyalty, especially during U.S-China tension. CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing.
The company said last July that it was considering seeking a Chinese investor to join as a significant member of the consortium under its sale plan, a move that some interpreted as way to please Beijing, but CK Hutchison hasn’t said more since.
The consortium also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, which is chaired by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li’s.
Last May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor.
Panama’s government has maintained it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it. But Rubio made clear that the US viewed the operation of the ports as a national security issue.