French prosecutors stick to demand for five-year ban for Le Pen

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen arrives for a hearing during which civil parties will be heard and prosecutors will present their sentencing request in her appeal trial at the Paris courthouse in Paris, France, Feb. 3, 2026. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

French prosecutors stick to demand for five-year ban for Le Pen

  • The first trial found Le Pen, along with 24 former European lawmakers, assistants and accountants as well as the party itself, guilty of operating a “system” from 2004 to 2016 using European parliament funds to employ RN staff in France

PARIS: French prosecutors demanded on Tuesday that an appeal court maintain a five-year ban on far-right leader Marine Le Pen from holding public office for a European parliament fraud, stepping up threats to her presidential ambitions.
If the court upholds last year’s bombshell ruling by a lower tribunal, Le Pen would be banned from running in France’s 2027 presidential election, widely seen as her best chance at the top job.
The prosecution also sought a four-year prison term with three years suspended and a 100,000-euro ($118,000) fine for the figurehead leader of the National Rally (RN) party, which has been riding high in the opinion polls.
Le Pen had hoped her appeal against her ban over a fake jobs scam at the European parliament — an accusation the 57-year-old has denied — would clear the way for her to run in the election after Emmanuel Macron stands down.
But during closing arguments lasting nearly six hours, attorney general Stephane Madoz-Blanchet told the court that “Marine Le Pen was the instigator, following in her father’s footsteps, of a system that enabled the party to embezzle 1.4 million euros.”
The first trial found Le Pen, along with 24 former European lawmakers, assistants and accountants as well as the party itself, guilty of operating a “system” from 2004 to 2016 using European parliament funds to employ RN staff in France.
Le Pen, the RN and 11 others are appealing the March 2025 ruling, which also sentenced her to four years in jail, with two suspended.

- Presidential race at stake -

Le Pen made it to the second round in the 2017 and 2022 presidential polls, losing to Macron both times. But he cannot run again next year after two consecutive terms in office.
During the appeal trial, she has denied that the RN had any “system” to embezzle European parliament funds and has said her party acted in “complete good faith.”
The appeal ends in February, with a verdict expected within months.
If she then appeals to the supreme court, its judges will rule before the 2027 presidential elections, they have said.
Le Pen has said she will decide whether to run after the ruling in the appeal trial, and has indicated that her lieutenant — 30-year-old RN president Jordan Bardella — could be the party’s candidate instead.
A poll in November predicted that, should he run, Bardella would win the second round of the 2027 elections, no matter who stands against him.
During Tuesday’s hearing, prosecutor Thierry Ramonatxo pushed back at claims that the judiciary had in any way aimed to “block a party leader’s ascent to the highest executive office” in the initial ruling.
“To suggest that the judiciary could oppose the will of the sovereign people is inaccurate,” he said.
“A judge is the guardian of the law and merely applies it.”
A French court last year handed an eight-month suspended jail sentence to a 76-year-old man over a death threat against the judge who convicted Le Pen.
 

 


EU reconsidering funds for Serbia as justice laws ‘eroding trust’

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

EU reconsidering funds for Serbia as justice laws ‘eroding trust’

BELGRADE: The ‌European Union could withhold funds from a 1.6 billion euro allocation of loans and grants to Serbia, after Belgrade passed laws that ​are “eroding trust” in its commitment to the rule of law, the bloc’s enlargement commissioner said.
Reforms to centralize the judiciary that came into force this week brought criticism from judges and prosecutors who see them as bolstering President Aleksandar Vucic’s hold on power, weakening the fight against organized crime and undermining Serbia’s bid to join the EU.
“These ‌amendments are ‌eroding trust. It is becoming ​harder for ‌those ⁠in ​Brussels who ⁠are willing to advance with Serbia to make their case,” EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos said in emailed comments to Reuters late on Thursday.
Kos said the commission was reviewing funding for Serbia under the EU Growth Plan for the Western Balkans, aimed at aligning the region to ⁠EU rules and ultimately bringing countries such as ‌Serbia into the bloc. ‌Serbia was allocated 1.6 billion euros of ​loans and grants under ‌the program.
“These (funds) contain preconditions linked to the rule ‌of law,” she said.
Serbia began official talks to join the EU in 2014 but widespread corruption and weak institutions have slowed progress.
The judicial reforms include limiting the mandate of chief public prosecutors and ‌granting court presidents — responsible for court administration — greater powers over judges. Critics fear the reforms ⁠will erode ⁠judges’ independence and jeopardize high-level corruption cases overseen by the Public Prosecutor’s Office for Organized Crime.
The government did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. The justice ministry has said that the new laws will make the judiciary more efficient by streamlining the decision-making process.
Since the backlash, Serbia has requested the opinion of the Venice Commission, a panel of constitutional law experts of the Council of Europe, a human rights ​body.
“Once that opinion is ​issued, we expect these laws to be revised accordingly and in an inclusive manner,” Kos said.