Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy

Afghan refugees, along with their belongings, await deportation to Afghanistan near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Chaman on October 29, 2025. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 31 October 2025
Follow

Islamabad warns fragile truce hinges on Kabul’s action against cross-border militancy

  • Pakistan, Afghanistan engaged in deadly clashes this month after Islamabad conducted airstrikes on what it said were TTP militants inside Afghanistan
  • Kabul, which denies sheltering the group, condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty and responded with cross-border fire along the 2,600 km frontier

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed to extend a ceasefire during talks in Istanbul after the worst border clashes between the neighbors in years, Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Friday, adding that the onus was now on Kabul to take action against militant groups.

The fresh round of negotiations, facilitated by Turkiye and other friendly nations, was aimed at easing border clashes that left dozens of soldiers, civilians and militants dead, before a temporary ceasefire was reached on Oct. 19. A second round of talks that started in Istanbul on Oct. 25 failed to reach breakthrough earlier this week, before Turkiye announced on Thursday evening that the ceasefire would continue. 

The clashes erupted after Pakistan launched airstrikes inside Afghanistan against Pakistani Taliban militants it says are based there and responsible for attacks on its forces. Kabul condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty and denies sheltering the group. The border, which runs more than 2,600 km (1,600 miles), has long been a source of friction with frequent skirmishes and mutual accusations over militant sanctuaries.

Information Minister Tarar described the outcome of the Istanbul talks as a “victory” for Pakistan and said the responsibility now rested with the Afghan Taliban to take concrete action against militant groups, the state-run Pakistan TV Digital reported.

“Pakistan’s stance has been clear, support for terrorism must end. A mechanism for monitoring, verification, and enforcement in case of violations will also be implemented,” he said, thanking Qatar and Turkiye for their mediation.

“All parties have agreed to put in place a monitoring and verification mechanism that will ensure maintenance of peace and impose penalties on the violating party,” Turkiye’s Foreign Ministry said of the October 25–30 talks.

It added that a follow-up meeting would be held in Istanbul on November 6 to decide how the mechanism will be implemented, and that Turkiye and Qatar “stand ready to continue cooperation with both sides for lasting peace and stability.”

Kabul government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid issued a separate statement shortly before midnight in Istanbul confirming the conclusion of the talks and saying both sides had agreed to continue discussions in future meetings.

A senior Pakistani security official, requesting anonymity, said Islamabad viewed the Istanbul understanding as a welcome step but a conditional truce, hinging on verifiable action by Kabul.

“Pakistan welcomes the interim understanding reached in Istanbul under the mediation of Türkiye and Qatar,” the official said. “But this ceasefire is not open-ended or unconditional. The single litmus test for its continuation is that Afghanistan will not allow its territory to be used for attacks against Pakistan and will take clear, verifiable and effective steps against [militants].”

The official added that Pakistan expected credible evidence of action, such as dismantling of hideouts, disruption of logistical networks, and prosecution of militant leadership, to be reported through the monitoring and verification mechanism agreed under the mediators’ auspices.

“If Afghanistan fails to deliver verifiable proof of agreed steps, or if militants continue to launch attacks from Afghan soil, Pakistan will deem the ceasefire violated and reserves all options to safeguard its sovereignty and citizens,” the official warned.

He said Pakistan had entered the new phase “in good faith, but with realism,” given past patterns of cross-border violence.

“This arrangement is a conditional truce — one which hinges on demonstrable responsibility by the Afghan side,” he said. “Failure to meet that responsibility will require Pakistan to revert to other measures.”

The clashes erupted on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes on what it called Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan-affiliated targets in Afghanistan. Kabul said it was a violation of its sovereignty.

Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of allowing the use of its soil by militant groups, particularly the TTP that has stepped up attacks inside Pakistan in recent years. Kabul denies the allegation.

— With inputs from Reuters


Pakistan opposition rallies in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to demand release of Imran Khan

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan opposition rallies in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to demand release of Imran Khan

  • PTI-led gathering calls the former PM a national hero and demands the release of all political prisoners
  • Government says the opposition failed to draw a large crowd and accuses PTI of damaging its own politics

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s opposition led by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party demanded the release of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan at a rally in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province on Sunday, describing him as a national hero who continues to command public support.

The gathering came days after a rare and strongly worded briefing by the military’s media chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, who dismissed Khan as “narcissistic” and “mentally ill” on Friday while responding to the former premier’s allegations that Pakistan’s chief of defense forces was responsible for undermining the constitution and rule of law.

He said that Khan was promoting an anti-state narrative which had become a national security threat.

The participants of the rally called for “civilian supremacy” and said elected representatives should be treated with respect.

“We, the people of Pakistan, regard Imran Khan as a national hero and the country’s genuinely elected prime minister, chosen by the public in the February 8, 2024 vote,” said a resolution presented at the rally in Peshawar. “We categorically reject and strongly condemn the notion that he or his colleagues pose any kind of threat to national security.”

“We demand immediate justice for Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi and all political prisoners, and call for their prompt release,” it added, referring to Khan’s wife who is also in prison. “No restrictions should be placed on Imran Khan’s meetings with his family, lawyers or political associates.”

Addressing the gathering, Sohail Afridi, the chief minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, denied his administration was not serious about security issues amid increased militant activity. However, he maintained the people of his province had endured the worst of Pakistan’s conflict with militancy and urged a rethinking of long-running security policies.

The resolution asked the federal government to restore bilateral trade and diplomatic channels with Afghanistan, saying improved cross-border ties were essential for the economic stability of the region.

The trade between the two neighbors has suffered as Pakistan accuses the Taliban administration in Kabul of sheltering and facilitating armed groups that it says launch cross-border attacks to target its civilians and security forces. Afghan officials deny the claim.

The two countries have also had deadly border clashes in recent months that have killed dozens of people on both sides.

Some participants of the rally emphasized the restoration of democratic freedoms, judicial independence and space for political reconciliation, calling them necessary to stabilize the country after years of political confrontation.

Reacting to the opposition rally, Information Minister Attaullah Tarrar said the PTI and its allies could not gather enough people.

“In trying to build an anti-army narrative, they have ruined their own politics,” he said, adding that the rally’s reaction to the military’s media chief’s statement reflected “how deeply it had stung.”

“There was neither any argument nor any real response,” he added, referring to what was said by the participants of the rally.