Italy court stalls Sicily bridge, triggers PM fury

Italy's government said Thursday it would address concerns over a new bridge to Sicily, after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned a court ruling against the project as an "intolerable intrusion". (X/@ZSchneeweiss)
Short Url
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

Italy court stalls Sicily bridge, triggers PM fury

  • In a ruling late Wednesday, the Court of Auditors, which oversees public spending, refused to approve the decision
  • Meloni condemned Wednesday’s ruling as “yet another encroachment on the jurisdiction of the government and parliament“

ROME: Italy’s government said Thursday it would address concerns over a new bridge to Sicily, after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned a court ruling against the project as an “intolerable intrusion.”
Meloni’s government in August approved the 13.5-billion-euro ($15.6-billion) project to build what would be the world’s longest suspension bridge connecting the island of Sicily to the mainland.
But in a ruling late Wednesday, the Court of Auditors, which oversees public spending, refused to approve the decision.
It said it would give its reasons within 30 days, but last month it had requested clarification about documentation used on the project, and on costs.
Meloni, leader of the far-right Brothers of Italy party, condemned Wednesday’s ruling as “yet another encroachment on the jurisdiction of the government and parliament.”
“The constitutional reform of the justice system and the reform of the Court of Auditors, both under discussion in the Senate and close to approval, represent the most appropriate response to this intolerable intrusion, which will not stop the government’s action,” she said in a statement.
At the same time, Matteo Salvini, head of the far-right League party who as deputy prime minister and transport minister has championed the bridge, said the ruling appeared to be a “political choice.”
Yet on Thursday, after Meloni called an emergency meeting with her ministers, the government adopted a more conciliatory tone.
“We await with extreme calm the Court of Auditors’ findings, to which we are confident we can respond point by point, because we have complied with the requirements,” Salvini told reporters.
In a statement, Meloni’s office confirmed the government would respond to each complaint, adding that “the objective... to proceed with the project remains firm.”
Italian politicians have for decades debated a bridge over the Strait of Messina, a narrow strip of water between the Sicily and the region of Calabria, at the toe of Italy’s boot.
“We have waited a century, and we will wait a century and two months,” Salvini added.

- ‘Respect for magistrates’ -

The approval in August by a government committee, CIPESS, is the furthest the project has ever got.
Advocates say the state-funded project will provide an economic boost for the impoverished south of Italy.
The government also hopes the bridge can be classified as a strategic asset, with its costs counting toward the money Italy has committed to spend on defense as part of the NATO military alliance.
However, critics warn that the project risks turning into a financial black hole.
It has also sparked local protests over the environmental impact, and complaints that the money could be better spent elsewhere.
The Court of Auditors on Thursday said its decision was based on legal aspects of the approval of the bridge, not on the merits of the project.
In a strongly worded decision, it added that any criticism of its decisions “must be conducted in a context of respect for the work of the magistrates.”
In three years in office, Meloni and her ministers have repeatedly taken aim at the judiciary for decisions they assert are political.
Parliament on Thursday approved a reform to separate the training, careers and status of judges and prosecutors, whom right-leaning governments in Italy have long accused of colluding to the detriment of the defense.
The reform must now go to a referendum.


Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

Updated 13 February 2026
Follow

Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

  • “The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told The Atlantic

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv ‌had sought to back US peace proposals to end the war with Russia as President Donald Trump seeks to resolve the conflict before ​November mid-term elections.
Zelensky, in an interview published by The Atlantic on Thursday, said Kyiv was willing to hold both a presidential election and a referendum on a deal, but would not settle for an accord that was detrimental to Ukraine’s interests.
“The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told the ‌US-based publication. “That’s why we started supporting their ​proposals in ‌any ⁠format ​that speeds ⁠things along.”
He said Ukraine was “not afraid of anything. Are we ready for elections? We’re ready. Are we ready for a referendum? We’re ready.”
Zelensky has sought to build good relations with Washington since an Oval Office meeting in February 2025 descended into a shouting match with Trump and US Vice President JD ⁠Vance.
But he said he had rejected a ‌proposal, reported this week by the ‌Financial Times, to announce the votes ​on February 24, the fourth ‌anniversary of Russia’s invasion. A ceasefire and proposed US security ‌guarantees against a future invasion had not yet been settled, he said.
“No one is clinging to power,” The Atlantic quoted him as saying. “I am ready for elections. But for that we need security, guarantees ‌of security, a ceasefire.”
And he added: “I don’t think we should put a bad deal ⁠up for a ⁠referendum.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Zelensky is not a legitimate negotiating partner because he has not faced election since coming to power in 2019.
Zelensky has said in recent weeks that a document on security guarantees for Ukraine is all but ready to be signed.
But, in his remarks, he acknowledged that details remained unresolved, including whether the US would be willing to shoot down incoming missiles over Ukraine if Russia were to violate the peace.
“This hasn’t been fixed ​yet,” Zelensky said. “We have raised ​it, and we will continue to raise these questions...We need all of this to be written out.”