Italy court stalls Sicily bridge, triggers PM fury

Italy's government said Thursday it would address concerns over a new bridge to Sicily, after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned a court ruling against the project as an "intolerable intrusion". (X/@ZSchneeweiss)
Short Url
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

Italy court stalls Sicily bridge, triggers PM fury

  • In a ruling late Wednesday, the Court of Auditors, which oversees public spending, refused to approve the decision
  • Meloni condemned Wednesday’s ruling as “yet another encroachment on the jurisdiction of the government and parliament“

ROME: Italy’s government said Thursday it would address concerns over a new bridge to Sicily, after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned a court ruling against the project as an “intolerable intrusion.”
Meloni’s government in August approved the 13.5-billion-euro ($15.6-billion) project to build what would be the world’s longest suspension bridge connecting the island of Sicily to the mainland.
But in a ruling late Wednesday, the Court of Auditors, which oversees public spending, refused to approve the decision.
It said it would give its reasons within 30 days, but last month it had requested clarification about documentation used on the project, and on costs.
Meloni, leader of the far-right Brothers of Italy party, condemned Wednesday’s ruling as “yet another encroachment on the jurisdiction of the government and parliament.”
“The constitutional reform of the justice system and the reform of the Court of Auditors, both under discussion in the Senate and close to approval, represent the most appropriate response to this intolerable intrusion, which will not stop the government’s action,” she said in a statement.
At the same time, Matteo Salvini, head of the far-right League party who as deputy prime minister and transport minister has championed the bridge, said the ruling appeared to be a “political choice.”
Yet on Thursday, after Meloni called an emergency meeting with her ministers, the government adopted a more conciliatory tone.
“We await with extreme calm the Court of Auditors’ findings, to which we are confident we can respond point by point, because we have complied with the requirements,” Salvini told reporters.
In a statement, Meloni’s office confirmed the government would respond to each complaint, adding that “the objective... to proceed with the project remains firm.”
Italian politicians have for decades debated a bridge over the Strait of Messina, a narrow strip of water between the Sicily and the region of Calabria, at the toe of Italy’s boot.
“We have waited a century, and we will wait a century and two months,” Salvini added.

- ‘Respect for magistrates’ -

The approval in August by a government committee, CIPESS, is the furthest the project has ever got.
Advocates say the state-funded project will provide an economic boost for the impoverished south of Italy.
The government also hopes the bridge can be classified as a strategic asset, with its costs counting toward the money Italy has committed to spend on defense as part of the NATO military alliance.
However, critics warn that the project risks turning into a financial black hole.
It has also sparked local protests over the environmental impact, and complaints that the money could be better spent elsewhere.
The Court of Auditors on Thursday said its decision was based on legal aspects of the approval of the bridge, not on the merits of the project.
In a strongly worded decision, it added that any criticism of its decisions “must be conducted in a context of respect for the work of the magistrates.”
In three years in office, Meloni and her ministers have repeatedly taken aim at the judiciary for decisions they assert are political.
Parliament on Thursday approved a reform to separate the training, careers and status of judges and prosecutors, whom right-leaning governments in Italy have long accused of colluding to the detriment of the defense.
The reform must now go to a referendum.


Only 4% women on ballot as Bangladesh prepares for post-Hasina vote

Updated 19 min 5 sec ago
Follow

Only 4% women on ballot as Bangladesh prepares for post-Hasina vote

  • Women PMs have ruled Bangladesh for over half of its independent history
  • For 2026 vote, only 20 out of 51 political parties nominated female candidates

DHAKA: As Bangladesh prepares for the first election since the ouster of its long-serving ex-prime minister Sheikh Hasina, only 4 percent of the registered candidates are women, as more than half of the political parties did not field female candidates.

The vote on Feb. 12 will bring in new leadership after an 18-month rule of the caretaker administration that took control following the student-led uprising that ended 15 years in power of Hasina’s Awami League party.

Nearly 128 million Bangladeshis will head to the polls, but while more than 62 million of them are women, the percentage of female candidates in the race is incomparably lower, despite last year’s consensus reached by political parties to have at least 5 percent women on their lists.

According to the Election Commission, among 1,981 candidates only 81 are women, in a country that in its 54 years of independence had for 32 years been led by women prime ministers — Hasina and her late rival Khaleda Zia.

According to Dr. Rasheda Rawnak Khan from the Department of Anthropology at Dhaka University, women’s political participation was neither reflected by the rule of Hasina nor Zia.

“Bangladesh has had women rulers, not women’s rule,” Khan told Arab News. “The structure of party politics in Bangladesh is deeply patriarchal.”

Only 20 out of 51 political parties nominated female candidates for the 2026 vote. Percentage-wise, the Bangladesh Socialist Party was leading with nine women, or 34 percent of its candidates.

The election’s main contender, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, whose former leader Zia in 1991 became the second woman prime minister of a predominantly Muslim nation — after Pakistan’s Benazir Bhutto — was the party that last year put forward the 5 percent quota for women.

For the upcoming vote, however, it ended up nominating only 10 women, or 3.5 percent of its 288 candidates.

The second-largest party, Jamaat-e-Islami, has not nominated a single woman.

The 4 percent participation is lower than in the previous election in 2024, when it was slightly above 5 percent, but there was no decreasing trend. In 2019, the rate was 5.9 percent, and 4 percent in 2014.

“We have not seen any independent women’s political movement or institutional activities earlier, from where women could now participate in the election independently,” Khan said.

“Real political participation is different and difficult as well in this patriarchal society, where we need to establish internal party democracy, protection from political violence, ensure direct election, and cultural shifts around female leadership.”

While the 2024 student-led uprising featured a prominent presence of women activists, Election Commission data shows that this has not translated into their political participation, with very few women contesting the upcoming polls.

“In the student movement, women were recruited because they were useful, presentable for rallies and protests both on campus and in the field of political legitimacy. Women were kept at the forefront for exhibiting some sort of ‘inclusive’ images to the media and the people,” Khan said.

“To become a candidate in the general election, one needs to have a powerful mentor, money, muscle power, control over party people, activists, and locals. Within the male-dominated networks, it’s very difficult for women to get all these things.”